Mrs Hinch #715 Same, same, same...off to B&M again!!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It’s lovely weather so she could’ve set something up at home even if she had to hire a marquee as I’m sure his classmates would’ve loved to see the animals. Suppose she is too much of a celeb to possibly host an event with other peoples kids. I remember when Mark Wright had a garden party last year he grifted (I’m sure) McDoanlds burgers. I find it so embarrassing when people do this but I suppose that’s how they have lots of money cos they never need to use it!
She can’t have kids over because of the animals or her house is smaller than the other families!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
It will never get to court. Tbh I have had a little look through some of my old posts and tbh all I found out was I am bleeping funny 😂
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 71
I see you have found a window to creep back in as the moral police on this thread. I always thought you were a funny one.

The thing is, when you say 'I give up' - don't, just chose your battles adequately. The people who need a good reasoning are those posting their kids images online for the only purpose of engagement and generating sales, not those on the reactive end. I suspect you're in for an endless game if you're policing those mentioning this immoral practice. I do agree however, that children should not be brought into the picture whatsoever but that's down to the marketeer.

Maybe target the big corporations who pressure influencers to utilise their kids in order to be more relatable? They’re the ones profiting the most and silently watching it all unfold. Criticism is unavoidable and I find it quite unbelievable that many are willing to pay that price in order to make money. I would never inflict that onto my children, or my family, and there is a point one has to wonder if it's something they are willing to take on considering all the risks involved. You can't just do it and hope for the best?

When some say people have every right to post their kids or whatever they want online, it is somewhat true, but every right comes with obligations and a price that more often than not has nothing to do with money. I am obviously talking about people with a commercial account, who post their kids online as a mean to an end. Mrs Hinch in this instance has made a conscious choice to carry on posting her kids altho she was allegedly criticised over her first born. She milked the autism topic for years before she officially announced it - she knew it would generate engagement on her acct and she definitely knew it would generate criticism. Would you do that to yourself and your child? Probably not. It is not to justify anyone's words but let's be frank about her own involvement and accountability in it.

The likes of the Hinch business want to have access to products to sell, people to sell it to, yet they want to shut down anyone or anything that has an opinion about the way it is done, and the very tools (herself, her family) that used & abused to sell. I find that concept rather totalitarian. This is not North Korea. People have a say when they are targeted, it goes both ways.

As much as I disapprove of criticising children, I mostly disapprove of people using their children to generate an income mainly because they haven't had the brains to do anything else but exploit their own kids.

I'm not in the slightest concerned about being named if it came to that, I have always expressed my opinion and there is nothing I wouldn't have said to mrs hinch directly. Her company and PR have a lot to answer for, so if anything I wonder how she can untangle herself out of the numerous lies and lack of ads/gifts she has received throughout the years. She undoubtedly has many anon accts in various sites so I do wonder how she would justify those as well.
Some members have made comments or assumed theories I didn’t agree with but none of this would have been possible without the creators posting incredibly private and therefore dangerous details about their private lives.
Id have loved to have replied to Alfie knows best, but it comes up that the post "cannot be found" 🤷‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Yes me too, all I'm guilty of is calling her a bleep once or twice, no judge would ever disagree with that 🤣
Same!
I'm shitting bricks in case JimBobNoKnobInchMansAllTheVestJanine might want to take me to court for coining the phrase "he makes my fan slam shut faster than a disturbed clam" 🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39
Yeah imagine being a bloke who non of you could find for YEARS and you don’t know anything about because he doesn’t broadcast his whole life on the internet.
Do you know as much about his child / children if he has any as 4 million people do about yours!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 25
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, all those who think the prosecution Sophie Rose (added in her teens) HinchCliffe a bleep please say aye.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 30
Is she tagging a new friend?
Yes, she pobably hasn’t got the balls to post it without tagging her, I can imagine them comparing their Tattle threads sitting at hinch farm American-diner-booth-table with some crunkys and pop.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 11
Yesterdays news Hunch it’s boring……did it make it to the like of the BBC news at 6?! Nope! Cuz guess what bigger things going on the world 🤦🏻‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Our mate Sebastian is prob on a yacht in the south of France and Soph is exactly where she needs to be, hosing down her camels
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 34
Our mate Sebastian is prob on a yacht in the south of France and Soph is exactly where she needs to be, hosing down her camels
Wonder how it makes them feel, knowing that he has made millions out of them! Now they know what it feels like for their followers, after all the years of lies and fleecing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 28
Adults making comments like ‘this child looks brain damaged’ is not on. It is distasteful and not funny at all. But it’s not *illegal* to be a twit on the internet. On Mumsnet last week a user called an anti-social child a ‘bleep’ TO HIS FACE and they were all discussing the rights and wrongs of that. Are we going to shut down mumsnet? I don’t get what all these influencers are frothing about - do they really think they’re going to ‘unmask’ and ‘expose’ the entire internet? Do they think they’re going to be able to sue people who say mean things about them? It’s not illegal to be rude! How would that work, exactly? Half of them get caught out with accounts on here slagging off their competition mates don’t they?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 22
I've never come across a comment saying the baby looks brain damaged. And if I did, I'd report it. Comments like those makes tattle look bad.
But one or two comments out of hundreds of hinch tattlers doesn't mean this thread is full of bullies. I don't believe any1 bullies her, do I think some posters go to far with their obsession YES. But most of us are here having a LAUGH.

She receives so many compliments when she's her natural self and not lying about a filter. She is not bullied here.

She exploits her kids and LIES everyday about everything. She's made millions through manipulation and lies. It's as simple as that. If she was a decent person, she wouldn't have a thread so big.

She's caused all this herself.

Do I or have I ever wished her harm, absolutely not. Do I wish her family harm, absolutely not. Would I approach her in the street, NO.
Would I go to her home. No.
Do I or have I ever said anything bad about her kids, no. I've commented on her children's bad behaviour, which I stand by.
This goes for a solid 90% of the tattlers on this thread.
A few bad comments from awful people doesn't mean we are all like it.

Alfie1234 has been on this thread for ages. Absolutely no saint. She/he is only now piping up and raving about Hinch so they look good because they are clearly another who's been scared So they're trying to flip the bleeping table on their own comments.

I hope tattle shuts down tbh, the fun has gone.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 28
So Tattle has been called a toxic website. In that case, influencers like Hinch are also toxic ...

They are narcissists who have to be the centre of attention screaming "look at me, look how wonderful I am, look at this latest great hack, buy my product ..."

They encourage excessive consumerism when the truth is they only "love" the products they are paid to promote ... or hope they might be paid for in the future ... remember how much Hinch wore that Dryrobe ...

They create fake images of their lives when the reality is very different. Highly edited videos remove all authenticity.

They create fake "friendships" with their followers with the sole aim of boosting their own egos and bank balances

They exploit the FOMO of their most vulnerable followers who can probably least afford to buy into whatever fad product/idea they are touting.

They are so entitled - they have built their brands on smoke and mirrors and now think they are both untouchable and the world owes them so much.

They actually offer nothing to society - someone like the wonderful Nancy Birtwhistle has a genuinely useful account with great advice - Hinch has told us what to call our cleaning cloths, has had a book of how to write lists printed under her name and the pinnacle of her life, her brand name on the side of a lorry delivering the tat she touts. Wow, empowered woman ... not.

They exploit their kids for financial gain. And this is the one that is the most toxic to me. If they are narcissists, encouraging consumerism etc etc then so be it - let the sheep fall for their fakery but using their kids is just so wrong for reasons we have repeated ad infinitum on here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.