I hope there’s parking and somewhere to hang her coat.
I do hope he has a nice time with his friends though (but also we shouldn’t see it)
Mrs Hinch #715 Same, same, same...off to B&M again!!
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Mrs Hinch Threads
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I do hope he has a nice time with his friends though (but also we shouldn’t see it)
I've never seen a comment describing him as brain damaged. Please provide evidence as you've made a lot for sweeping statements. Comments about kids are generally removed by mods so your argument is void.
There are worse things than comments, that they will never see, happening to those kids pictures. This is a gossip page. People are judged for the way they look. Comments about kids looks are removed swiftly - so how is it you think Vinnie will see these comments?
Hopefully she'll have a bit of common sense to know the other children might have parents who don't want them online, certainly not on a public business page.
Oh Yh that’s a good idea, woe betide kids running round the farm having fun and making a mess!
They've hired a local hall haven't they? And then it'll be roleplay stuff. To be fair a McDonald's party was fairly standard in the 90s for 5/6yos, but usually around the food than dress up so much.So I wonder if she’s going to take a couple of Ronnieblesshims friends to Mac’s and he’s going to hand out the meals or she’s going to have a massive bbq in her massive garden and invite his whole class and have a bouncy castle and have a great time? We all know how boring she is so probably the former!
She's probably hoping McDonald's will get in touch with a free delivery of food to his party. She can afford it herself though so a decent person would refuse it, or perhaps donate the free food to people more needy.
That particular comment was removed reported and removed swiftly. The same poster then continued with derogatory comments about the children, and a warning was posted by a mod or admin(can't remember which, but it was a recent thread)
Roy Royoiiiiiii, and the other two voted no at the tribal council meeting.
(Cannot for the life of me remember the names of the other Wooly Wankers, sorry)
It’s lovely weather so she could’ve set something up at home even if she had to hire a marquee as I’m sure his classmates would’ve loved to see the animals. Suppose she is too much of a celeb to possibly host an event with other peoples kids. I remember when Mark Wright had a garden party last year he grifted (I’m sure) McDoanlds burgers. I find it so embarrassing when people do this but I suppose that’s how they have lots of money cos they never need to use it!
I hate wicker baskets and fake flowers absolute dust collectors
Agree. Dust magnets
Wow! do you have a screen shot? I haven't seen any comments at all like that on here ever
Not been on for ages but just noticed the whole tattle hoohah. Was reading the comments on the original Lorraine fb post. Loads of influencers jumping on saying ‘tattle announced my kids school’ or ‘tattle showed my address’ and ‘tattle announced my pregnancy’ etc. 1-tattle knew the school because YOU POSTED A PHOTO OF YOUR KIDS WITH THE SCHOOL LOGO ON IT. 2- tattle knew because YOU SHOW EVERY ANGLE OF YOUR HOUSE, FROM ROAD TO ATTIC. 3-it was a guess. There’s always speculation. But if someone came on and said you were pregnant maybe you should LOOK AT YOUR INNER CIRCLE. I don’t agree with going to someone’s page and trolling or sending private messages. But chatting on here is like talking with a mate behind another persons back. Which has been a thing since cavemen. Most of them are probably peed off because we could see the lies and the deceit and the blatant pimping out of their kids and called them out. To others on here
Seen a lot of sly comments on other threads about kids too, people thinking maybe it's not too bad, so people think they're ok with sly remarks, but it's still calling an innocent kid, maybe everyone needs to re check what they've posted in the past or realise that where ever you are, online or in life there's always going to be sick individuals who take things too far.
Sounds like it was dealt with properly. Vinnie as a baby is unlikely to login to tattle to have read it before it was deleted.
So it's been deleted, how is Vinnie going to see it when he grows up?
To be honest I'm glad she's actually taking the kids out of the house and doing something relatively normal for them.
It's so sad so many Wimpy bars have been closed down. Bender in a bun? What a classicI had a wimpy party once I am that old
I see you have found a window to creep back in as the moral police on this thread. I always thought you were a funny one.Because the internet is forever and yes they got removed because I and many others reported them, but they should never have been made in the first place! That you are twisting yourself in knots to try and justify it and turn it back against me because I’ve dared to challenge the “we’re all so nice about the kids” schtick that people like to parrot speaks volumes. I’m well aware it’s a gossip page, that’s another trope people like to trot out to justify what they’ve said.
I honestly give up
The thing is, when you say 'I give up' - don't, just chose your battles adequately. The people who need a good reasoning are those posting their kids images online for the only purpose of engagement and generating sales, not those on the reactive end. I suspect you're in for an endless game if you're policing those mentioning this immoral practice. I do agree however, that children should not be brought into the picture whatsoever but that's down to the marketeer.
Maybe target the big corporations who pressure influencers to utilise their kids in order to be more relatable? They’re the ones profiting the most and silently watching it all unfold. Criticism is unavoidable and I find it quite unbelievable that many are willing to pay that price in order to make money. I would never inflict that onto my children, or my family, and there is a point one has to wonder if it's something they are willing to take on considering all the risks involved. You can't just do it and hope for the best?
When some say people have every right to post their kids or whatever they want online, it is somewhat true, but every right comes with obligations and a price that more often than not has nothing to do with money. I am obviously talking about people with a commercial account, who post their kids online as a mean to an end. Mrs Hinch in this instance has made a conscious choice to carry on posting her kids altho she was allegedly criticised over her first born. She milked the autism topic for years before she officially announced it - she knew it would generate engagement on her acct and she definitely knew it would generate criticism. Would you do that to yourself and your child? Probably not. It is not to justify anyone's words but let's be frank about her own involvement and accountability in it.
The likes of the Hinch business want to have access to products to sell, people to sell it to, yet they want to shut down anyone or anything that has an opinion about the way it is done, and the very tools (herself, her family) that used & abused to sell. I find that concept rather totalitarian. This is not North Korea. People have a say when they are targeted, it goes both ways.
As much as I disapprove of criticising children, I mostly disapprove of people using their children to generate an income mainly because they haven't had the brains to do anything else but exploit their own kids.
I'm not in the slightest concerned about being named if it came to that, I have always expressed my opinion and there is nothing I wouldn't have said to mrs hinch directly. Her company and PR have a lot to answer for, so if anything I wonder how she can untangle herself out of the numerous lies and lack of ads/gifts she has received throughout the years. She undoubtedly has many anon accts in various sites so I do wonder how she would justify those as well.
Some members have made comments or assumed theories I didn’t agree with but none of this would have been possible without the creators posting incredibly private and therefore dangerous details about their private lives.
- Status