Keep on topic and stop arguing about bags of the real or fake variety
I hope no one believes anything this woman tries to say. She is running a puppy mill operation, end of discussion - don't be fooled by the flashy Instagram facade. It's pretty obvious why Molly Mae's team are refusing to engage any further with this woman, because she's a scam artist desperately trying to protect her business selling fucked up inbred dogs from Russia. Engaging with her further would only cause more trouble.
there are no titles on these threads,the thread title suggestions were actually fantastic, one with over 60 likes, is there a way to still use them or...?? also last thread didn't even hit 1000 posts yet?
Unless Tommy is ditched there's no room for a title!I’m sure there was a title suggestion which had 64 likes...can we make that the title?
Ditch Tommy he’s boring anywayUnless Tommy is ditched there's no room for a title!
is this comment for Yel or Molly can’t say I don’t agree if it’s for the latterDitch Tommy he’s boring anyway
you're right I agree we should discuss him in these threads when appropriate but let's be real it's about molly because he's sooo boring (I would never wish unhappiness upon any couple but I'd love to see molly thriving on her own and singleDitch Tommy he’s boring anyway
Doubt it. She probably wants to distance herself from it as much as possible.I wonder if she will address these Tiffany Puppies stories
Oh my mistake she isn’tIf she wants to distance herself from it, why is she still following the account? Just find it weird. And they’re tagged still in the picture of her tommy and the dog
I am just playing devil’s advocate, but do you not think it is weird that molly Mae posted her YouTube video discussing mr chai’s cause of death on the 3rd of June vs in the screen shot with francesca Britton on the 24th of June, it states that they had not gotten the autopsy Results Back from the vets. if indeed tiffany_puppies is just out to fix her reputation, why Should francesca Britton entertain her with an email response at all?quoting from the previous thread:
I hope no one believes anything this woman tries to say. She is running a puppy mill operation, end of discussion - don't be fooled by the flashy Instagram facade. It's pretty obvious why Molly Mae's team are refusing to engage any further with this woman, because she's a scam artist desperately trying to protect her business selling fucked up inbred dogs from Russia. Engaging with her further would only cause more trouble.
tiffany_puppies has also posted screenshots of a "forensic report" from a vet commissioned by herself which I'm highly skeptical of (note this vet never treated Mr Chai; as far as I can see they've only read the autopsy report). I'm sure a lot of people could pay a retired veterinarian thousands and they'd write up a report that reads in your favour. I don't have time to go through it fully, but there's a lot of weird claims made in that report by the vet. For example, they claim it is "highly unlikely" that the dog suffered from complete panleukopenia (no white blood cells), yet in the same breath says they'd need a blood sample to verify this - how is this vet with '39 years experience' making conclusions about the dog's blood when they don't even have access to the blood test results?!
Do not fall for it. And Molly shouldn't respond to it either, it's what this woman wants. Hopefully they've learned their lesson over supporting breeders like this.
I think you're mixing up the autopsy report with the biopsy results. The autopsy report was what Molly discussed in the video, and Tiffany's Puppies have literally said they have received and read the autopsy report. Biopsy results are a different thing separate from the initial autopsy. So no, there's nothing weird about Molly discussing the cause of the dog's death in her video - clearly the vet who did the autopsy was able to make an informed assessment of how the dog died based on the initial autopsy, with the biopsies being taken just as part of normal procedure. The results of those biopsy tests would've come after Molly's video.I am just playing devil’s advocate, but do you not think it is weird that molly Mae posted her YouTube video discussing mr chai’s cause of death on the 3rd of June vs in the screen shot with francesca Britton on the 24th of June, it states that they had not gotten the autopsy Results Back from the vets. if indeed tiffany_puppies is just out to fix her reputation, why Should francesca Britton entertain her with an email response at all?
I think its cool to mix and match! I don't think they do it to be relatable I just think its a thing people do. I dont have designer but I mix expensive pieces with regular affordable pieces all the time. I actually think its better that way?Has anybody here tried her tan range and what are their opinions of it? I normally use bondi sands!
Also I’ve realised that when Molly tags her outfits the majority of her outfits are affordable fast fashion head to toe (which is probably gifted) and then a couple of designer accessories e.g luxury handbags or shoes.
On one hand I think she looks great on the other hand I feel like make your mind up are you being luxe or relatable? So confused with this relatable bougie thing going on with influencers, like ooh just filming my B&M trip in the morning to get an eye mask for my first class flight to my luxury holidays
I think that’s exactly what they’re going for with her brand - they want her to be ‘girl next door’ relatable in high street fashion and popping out for a Starbucks, but with a luxe ‘aspirational’ edge. She’s just like you! But with a bit more money! Maybe if you keep following her you can be more like that - you’re already halfway there!Has anybody here tried her tan range and what are their opinions of it? I normally use bondi sands!
Also I’ve realised that when Molly tags her outfits the majority of her outfits are affordable fast fashion head to toe (which is probably gifted) and then a couple of designer accessories e.g luxury handbags or shoes.
On one hand I think she looks great on the other hand I feel like make your mind up are you being luxe or relatable? So confused with this relatable bougie thing going on with influencers, like ooh just filming my B&M trip in the morning to get an eye mask for my first class flight to my luxury holidays
Think that a part of being an influencer makes them not want to wear the same items of clothing repeatedly too and keep it with the trends whereas with accessories it's easier to rewear them without getting slated for "wearing the same tit again"I think that’s exactly what they’re going for with her brand - they want her to be ‘girl next door’ relatable in high street fashion and popping out for a Starbucks, but with a luxe ‘aspirational’ edge. She’s just like you! But with a bit more money! Maybe if you keep following her you can be more like that - you’re already halfway there!
If she goes too luxe then she loses her relatability and could be accused of being just another rich girl like so many other influencers, yet if she’s constantly in Poundland every day then she loses that glam/aspirational aspect and why would her followers be bothered. I think her team are very shrewdly marketing her image to straddle the two to try get the best of both worlds.
My friend got it for Christmas. Said it’s green whilst it’s developing but looks lovely after washing off.Has anybody here tried her tan range and what are their opinions of it? I normally use bondi sands!
Also I’ve realised that when Molly tags her outfits the majority of her outfits are affordable fast fashion head to toe (which is probably gifted) and then a couple of designer accessories e.g luxury handbags or shoes.
On one hand I think she looks great on the other hand I feel like make your mind up are you being luxe or relatable? So confused with this relatable bougie thing going on with influencers, like ooh just filming my B&M trip in the morning to get an eye mask for my first class flight to my luxury holidays