Minniharrisuk #1

[byefeliciax]

I thought she knew some of the risks her children are vulnerable to because for a very short time she was blurring their faces, but in hindsight I think that was just performative and she genuinely is that brainless and naive.

It’s either pure stupidity or that the engagement dropped, and validation from strangers was more important to her than protecting her kids from dirty men on the internet.

You only have to scroll through her followers to see how many dirty men who don’t even interact with her posts are watching her and her kids. Of course they’re watching her! She looks like a 12 year old with massive bits, and she freely shares her children with them. She’s a torpedo’s dream account, they don’t even need to go to the dark web for their fap fodder.

 

[Lizzie Mintdrop]

I dont thonk they do tbh..AIDS is no longer a killer

No, it's not but STIs are on the increase and they becoming resistant to antibiotics

 

[dumdums83]

Do youngsters not worry about STIs nowadays? She's obviously having unprotected sex with a stranger right away, I'm not judging her for the sex, just the unprotected part. I knew a girl who contracted HIV from her first boyfriend, this was back in the 80s. No one knew she had HIV until she was pregnant with her second child in 1990 so by this point her first child and new partner had also contracted HIV. The new partner killed himself when he found out he had it. She died very soon after the new baby was born. Her mother took on the new baby but refused to look after the older child so it ended up in care, very poorly and an orphan by 5yrs old. These are the cautionary tales my generation grew up with, although it was very, very real. Use protection!

I knew a girl that was 22 and in one year she had 4 partners and she let everyone of the dump their load inside of her, each time having to take the morning after pill, having to explain to her sti’s. I gave up with her in the end

 

[Iamintherealworld]

I thought she knew some of the risks her children are vulnerable to because for a very short time she was blurring their faces, but in hindsight I think that was just performative and she genuinely is that brainless and naive.

It’s either pure stupidity or that the engagement dropped, and validation from strangers was more important to her than protecting her kids from dirty men on the internet.

You only have to scroll through her followers to see how many dirty men who don’t even interact with her posts are watching her and her kids. Of course they’re watching her! She looks like a 12 year old with massive bits, and she freely shares her children with them. She’s a torpedo’s dream account, they don’t even need to go to the dark web for their fap fodder.

There was a programme about all this not that long ago. The peodos and pervs use kids faces on the dark web and do god knows what with the images. Now theres that awful App - i forget the name that is is trying to be banned, can show you naked from a clothed photo.

Well, her decisions and choices. One small enounter of sexual abuse in childhood you have a child, then an adult is ducked in the head for life. A Mother shoukd be shielding and protecting her little ones. Emmy no top on is outright wrong in a public setting amongst strangers, body private parts are called privates for a reason. PRIVATES.

Makes me sick to the stomach babies images used for peodo use.

 

[Iamintherealworld]

I thought she knew some of the risks her children are vulnerable to because for a very short time she was blurring their faces, but in hindsight I think that was just performative and she genuinely is that brainless and naive.

It’s either pure stupidity or that the engagement dropped, and validation from strangers was more important to her than protecting her kids from dirty men on the internet.

You only have to scroll through her followers to see how many dirty men who don’t even interact with her posts are watching her and her kids. Of course they’re watching her! She looks like a 12 year old with massive bits, and she freely shares her children with them. She’s a torpedo’s dream account, they don’t even need to go to the dark web for their fap fodder.

When she started showing the kids again do you remember she announced it. Said someone or people scared her - probably read on here, what we were saying, the influencers think we are trolls and nasty. Safeguarding is a thing, it is extremely risky and dangerous putting kids online. It will most definitely be banned one day.

A brand most probably told her its fine.
Minnie will be easily lead a carrot dangling a blokes load

Remember her giving us the cautionary tale of being locked out her own bleeping home with her young babies.!!! Teens had taken over her home and locked her out. Publicly saying this as a warning to others shows she has not much between the ears. SS must be involved, surely?

 

[Iamintherealworld]

I knew a girl that was 22 and in one year she had 4 partners and she let everyone of the dump their load inside of her, each time having to take the morning after pill, having to explain to her sti’s. I gave up with her in the end

Note to self to make it plain clear to my children before they embark on a sexual life to educate on this

I honestly do not understand why some are the way they are because my kids do part of the school curriculum PHSYE (not sure right acronym!) and PAL, been learning since Y5. They know more than i did at their age about sex. And PAL is SO good. Learn about debt, APR repayments, mortgages allsorts of very useful stuff for adult life.

 

[byefeliciax]

SS wouldn’t give a curd. Her kids are fed and clothed and their house looks nice, SS resources are spread too thinly to care about Minnie’s kids when there are kids of junkies falling through the net. That doesn’t mean Minnie is a mature or safe parent though. She gives strangers intimate access to her kids, on and offline.

It’s about time the government, as part of the online safety movement and banning social media for under 16s, move into regulating what is shared online by parents. We know the risks, you only have to Google ‘sharenting’ or ‘oversharenting’ to see article after article about the risks. It’s high time sharing your child’s life, personal information, and intimate family photos is seen as the child abuse that it is. Once upon a time, it was a social norm to put whiskey in a baby’s bottle to help them sleep and everyone said that was ok, but we’ve learned and we’ve grown. It goes to show that just because it’s normalised doesn’t mean it’s harmless. People need to wise up about sharenting.

There’s a lot of hatred towards Tattle, but it’s the only place on the internet where there is sensible discourse and critique of parents who exploit their children for monetary gain in the completely unregulated world of “influencing”.

 

[Iamintherealworld]

SS wouldn’t give a curd. Her kids are fed and clothed and their house looks nice, SS resources are spread too thinly to care about Minnie’s kids when there are kids of junkies falling through the net. That doesn’t mean Minnie is a mature or safe parent though. She gives strangers intimate access to her kids, on and offline.

It’s about time the government, as part of the online safety movement and banning social media for under 16s, move into regulating what is shared online by parents. We know the risks, you only have to Google ‘sharenting’ or ‘oversharenting’ to see article after article about the risks. It’s high time sharing your child’s life, personal information, and intimate family photos is seen as the child abuse that it is. Once upon a time, it was a social norm to put whiskey in a baby’s bottle to help them sleep and everyone said that was ok, but we’ve learned and we’ve grown. It goes to show that just because it’s normalised doesn’t mean it’s harmless. People need to wise up about sharenting.

There’s a lot of hatred towards Tattle, but it’s the only place on the internet where there is sensible discourse and critique of parents who exploit their children for monetary gain in the completely unregulated world of “influencing”.

It's the Mum influencing that brought me here.

 

[byefeliciax]

It's the Mum influencing that brought me here.

Me too. It makes me so angry, but if you try to call it out you get blocked or branded judgemental and jumped on by a suckup army of followers in parasocial relationships with utter narcissists.

It’s refreshing to interact with people who share my views on it all. Thank Tattle

 

[Iamintherealworld]

It’s funny you should raise this. I was being nosey before, not going to put screenshots or name names here, but she has previously tagged Kyle’s family in posts and I went snooping.

His mum’s Facebook is wide open. In (I think) around May time last year, when she’d known the family 3 months, they went out on a boat trip with the kids and then had a family barbecue. Minnie posted about that. Kyle’s mum also posted it, but in his mum’s photos little E was sitting on Kyle’s dad’s lap steering the boat with him. And then the kids were in swimsuits in a paddling pool in their garden, and Kyle’s mum also posted a photo of just E on her public profile, completely topless with her little chest and nipples out. You just don’t know who is doing what with that photo do you!

I’m sorry, they might be the nicest family in the world, but she had no way of knowing that that early on. Look how many public figures (even some who have been considered national treasures) have turned out to be n0nces and grapists! You just can’t know!

I think not only is it wildly inappropriate to have a family you barely know that intimately close to your young children (and encouraging your tiny daughter that it’s ok to sit on a strange man’s lap), but to allow them to share public photos of your half nude child? And then to allow them be so careless with sparklers with her toddlers? It screams safeguarding at me, and that Minnie isn’t mature enough to set or enforce boundaries to protect her kids.

Being a good parent is more than keeping their clothes clean, serving up 3 meals a day, and decorating their bedrooms. It’s being smart enough to keep them safe from harm, and that she is clearly not.

I have looked on Facebook. Seen the bfs mothers garden pics. I would be SO pissed my daughter shown like this, then again she was never half naked in public.

Are his family not UK decent? The demographic difference of his and her family. Wondering if they would know about spongy benefit claiming single Mums if maybe not long been here?. This tit is unique to the UK. They look pretty normal everday folk. Working, nicely kept, go on holidays ect. Why on earth would their son get stuck and saddled with a ready made family and add to the family at such a young age so soon.

 

[Iamintherealworld]

Me too. It makes me so angry, but if you try to call it out you get blocked or branded judgemental and jumped on by a suckup army of followers in parasocial relationships with utter narcissists.

It’s refreshing to interact with people who share my views on it all. Thank Tattle

Oh yes, give an opinion they dont like youre blocked.

Another topic that raises my hackles is posting full on photos of deceased babies.

 

[byefeliciax]

That photo is very clearly the gender reveal cake, the beach, and the scan picture that says she was 19w 3d at the time, taken in August 2025, which means the baby will have already arrived in January.

Spoiler

She’s now trying to say they did the gender reveal at 9 weeks and that she’s actually due this month. I call bull. She had the baby already. She’s lying to make it look like she didn’t rush to have Kyle blow his beans up her the minute they met, she knows very well how that makes her look.

 

[byefeliciax]

Until she posts a bump video with her newly blonded hair, I don’t believe her that she’s still pregnant, because so much of this doesn’t add up.

It won’t win her any favours to have deceived people who support her. She’s gaslighting her followers, and there’s no way she can keep up the lie forever. She’ll slip and say it’s the baby’s birthday one January and people will say huh, I thought they came in March.

 

[Iamintherealworld]

View attachment 3910922

That photo is very clearly the gender reveal cake, the beach, and the scan picture that says she was 19w 3d at the time, taken in August 2025, which means the baby will have already arrived in January.

Spoiler

View attachment 3910929

She’s now trying to say they did the gender reveal at 9 weeks and that she’s actually due this month. I call bull. She had the baby already. She’s lying to make it look like she didn’t rush to have Kyle blow his beans up her the minute they met, she knows very well how that makes her look.

I am certain she looks on here and whatever we think - if correct. Like months ago sussed she was pregnant..reacts and then lies and pretends.

 

[byefeliciax]

I just can’t believe for a second she was spending all those hundreds of pounds on an NIPT test privately to find out the sex of a 9 week fetus, especially when she’s not raking in the money and (sorry if this sounds insensitive) she’d allegedly not long miscarried, and knew she wasn’t in that ‘safe zone’ second trimester.

Also at that time she was a) on benefits, b) struggling to buy a car outright because she’d spent all her money on driving lessons, and so c) had just committed to a ‘66 plate Nissan Juke for nearly £11,000 on finance (so repayments are probably around £250 a month… out of her measly benefits). There’s no way early sex testing was a funding priority, and if it was then she’s dumber than I first thought.

Of course the boyfriend’s family might have paid for it, but I doubt the average family is jumping for joy and excited enough about gender when their 22 year old son has just knocked up a scrounging single mother he’s only known a few weeks.

 

[Iamintherealworld]

I just can’t believe for a second she was spending all those hundreds of pounds on an NIPT test privately to find out the sex of a 9 week fetus, especially when she’s not raking in the money and (sorry if this sounds insensitive) she’d allegedly not long miscarried, and knew she wasn’t in that ‘safe zone’ second trimester.

Also at that time she was a) on benefits, b) struggling to buy a car outright because she’d spent all her money on driving lessons, and so c) had just committed to a ‘66 plate Nissan Juke for nearly £11,000 on finance (so repayments are probably around £250 a month… out of her measly benefits). There’s no way early sex testing was a funding priority, and if it was then she’s dumber than I first thought.

Of course the boyfriend’s family might have paid for it, but I doubt the average family is jumping for joy and excited enough about gender when their 22 year old son has just knocked up a scrounging single mother he’s only known a few weeks.

Ive just seen the post

I came on to say..on bleeping benefits. Private blood tests, extra scans, private..only on benefit street!

Working couples having to postpone or not have a baby. This CUNTry is a JOKE and not a funny one at that.

Pregnancy bleeping tests are not cheap How many did she use. Only someone desperate for a baby carries on like this way

And my opinion. She has already one of each. Wait until the delivery room for a lovely SURPRISE. Gender reveals are not mandatory. They were introduced for comercialism along with baby showers.

As Instagram Rossi would say. Ya bleep, thereeeeerrr I ssssaid it.

 

[Iamintherealworld]

Thought. Miscarriage may not have been Kyle's !

 

[byefeliciax]

I think she has mentioned before that “we” had a miscarriage and that someone was taunting him about it so it probably was his. But whether she was 9 or 19 weeks pregnant in August, to have been pregnant twice by then by a guy she met in February, is just disgusting. Especially when it’s clear as day she planned and wanted it.

I can’t pretend like accidents don’t happen early on in relationships, but when it isn’t an accident it’s actually really worrying about that mother’s mindset. Nobody in their right mind plans a family with someone they’ve known five minutes. Then when you add into the equation she made that choice when they had no experience of living together, she doesn’t have a financial plan to provide for the child, and she expects a bigger council house on top…

 

[Iamintherealworld]

I think she has mentioned before that “we” had a miscarriage and that someone was taunting him about it so it probably was his. But whether she was 9 or 19 weeks pregnant in August, to have been pregnant twice by then by a guy she met in February, is just disgusting. Especially when it’s clear as day she planned and wanted it.

I can’t pretend like accidents don’t happen early on in relationships, but when it isn’t an accident it’s actually really worrying about that mother’s mindset. Nobody in their right mind plans a family with someone they’ve known five minutes. Then when you add into the equation she made that choice when they had no experience of living together, she doesn’t have a financial plan to provide for the child, and she expects a bigger council house on top…

Oh yes. Remember now. However, as time has gone on I don't believe a word she says.

 

[byefeliciax]

It’s hard to believe someone who can’t keep a straight story and sets out to deliberately deceive.

This whole drawn out announcement, starting with the kitten as a red herring, and going into a video that clearly says “half baked” implying 20 weeks, and then a gender reveal and saying she’s due this month, her whole audience is confused as hell in the comments. I don’t think it’s had the impact she intended.