He really is not prioritizing his channel anymore. You’d think the patreons would care.
What's that legal term when someone takes money for stated purpose A, but then uses the money for unstated purpose B? Fraud?
For instance, let's say over a period of months or years you subscribe to a youtube video channel and give $20 a month to [insert Michael Kay's name here] in exchange for [insert Michael Kay's name here] producing Disney-related programming seven times a week, but after taking your money, [insert Michael Kay's name here] stops producing daily program content while still taking your money. Is that fraud?
Does it matter if the payor has paid [insert Michael Kay's name here] for a full year of programming up front to get a 5% discount? Does [insert Michael Kay's name here]'s offer of a 5% discount serve as an inducement to enter into a fraudulent transaction rendering [insert Michael Kay's name here]'s scheme plainly and intentionally fraudulent?
Let's add in a grifting component where, over time, the suspected fraudster, [insert Michael Kay's name here], gradually reduces his programming content and eventually provides no content, but still takes your money. Does that gradual reduction in programming content allow the suspected grifter, [insert Michael Kay's name here], to defend against a fraud claim because the payor knew about the program reduction over time, but still continued to provide the suspected grifter, [insert Michael Kay's name here], with money each month while knowing that, over time, the payor will receive less and less programming content?
Let's assume that the suspected grifter, [insert Michael Kay's name here], has issued threats to take legal action against anonymous people on a message board devoted to discussing the perceived programming and character failures of [insert Michael Kay's name here]. Does [insert Michael Kay's name here] have any cause of action against [insert T-Rexx's name here] where [insert T-Rexx's name here] merely asked a series of questions about [insert Michael Kay's name here]'s conduct without making any assertions of fact?
Does it matter that the suspected grifter, [insert Michael Kay's name here], is not using his real name while grifting? Can a person using a fake name like [insert Michael Kay's name here] bring a cause of action protect the reputation of a fake identity? Does the suspected grifter's use of a fake name make the grifting scheme more or less fraudulent?
Does [insert Michael Kay's name here] become a public figure for purposes of bringing a cause of action against anonymous people who discuss his crappy video content and mendacious character on a message board devoted to following and promoting [insert Michael Kay's name here]'s programming content, because he publishes programming where he promotes himself as the subject of his programming content, thereby requiring [insert Michael Kay's name here] to prove
NY Times v. Sullivan actual malice to collect reputational damages? Does it matter that the discussion concerns anonymous people's opinions concerning the reputation of a person like [insert Michael Kay's name here] whose programming content presents a fake personna to the public?
Is the ability to formulate questions a valuable tool when pondering the suspected fraudulent actions of [insert Michael Kay's name here]?
Does anyone know why [insert Michael Kay's name here] is taking a break?
https://www.patreon.com/MichaelKay
[insert Michael Kay's name here] is no longer promoting himself as "Florida Living, Cruising, Theme Parks." Is he rebranding again this week?