Lucy Letby Case #82

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I see Dorries is in the Mail demonstrating a distinct lack of medical knowledge despite previously working as a nurse. She’s detailed the so-called “new evidence” and it’s a load of rit.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 7
Can't stand how much the Mail simps for her, it's really sickening. Stlil convinced Peter Hitchens is just after a bag, he is obsessed.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 10
Thirwall update

The Inquiry can now give a further update regarding publication of the final report.

The report will be published at the earliest practical date, however that will not be until after the summer recess of Parliament.

We will give further updates regarding publication in due course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11

Finally we can get a season 2 of The Queen's Gambit off Netflix, prison style.
If it’s true that Letby is mates with Sara Sharif’s murderer-why would a supposedly caring person who loved babies & children, as Letby supporters say she is, hang around with someone who tortured & killed a child? It’s not bleeping normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Once this is all over and done with and it’s made official that the creature isn’t going anywhere. The parents should sue every one of these so called experts and journalists that have too much to say, for emotional distress. Especially Gill and that Dorres bleep or whatever her name is
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21
I like how quiet it is recently. There's only so much they can repeat over and over before there's no more column inches left. Anything that comes out now seems to be old news.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
He's keeping his head down after getting his a handed to him by Dame Vera Baird
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
There was this-https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...urse-pulls-letby-accuser-images-from-website/ a few days ago but I can't read the article as you have to sign up. Anyone know what it's about? I dread to think it's causing upset to "Letby fans" but that's naturally where my mind goes these days with this crazy case. I hope it's about the families but I can't imagine they'd be angry at Ravi for doing this type of thing?

ETA-I just realised it's by Sarah Knapton-say no more!
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1
There was this-https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...urse-pulls-letby-accuser-images-from-website/ a few days ago but I can't read the article as you have to sign up. Anyone know what it's about? I dread to think it's causing upset to "Letby fans" but that's naturally where my mind goes these days with this crazy case. I hope it's about the families but I can't imagine they'd be angry at Ravi for doing this type of thing?

ETA-I just realised it's by Sarah Knapton-say no more!
Chester Racecourse had a picture on their website that included Dr Ravi. Rabid Letby supporters spend their entire lives looking for such things and when they find them carry out campaigns of harassment.
 
A doctor who accused Lucy Letby of harming babies has been removed from online advertising for Chester Racecourse.

Dr Ravi Jayaram was pictured on the Visit Cheshire website in promotional material for the racecourse, which shows him enjoying a day at the races holding a racecard and a drink.

The images were replaced after being described as a “shocking misjudgment” on social media. The marketing team behind the photographs said it had “updated” them following a request from the racecourse, which said it wanted to avoid upset.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 4
Dr Jayaram was one of several consultants at the Countess of Chester Hospital who accused Letby of harming babies in 2015 and 2016. His testimony has been questioned, and the reliability of his evidence forms part of Letby’s application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which looks at potential miscarriages of justice.


In the case of one child – Baby K – Dr Jayaram told jurors he had caught Letby standing by the infant’s incubator, not intervening or calling for help, as the baby collapsed. He also accused her of dislodging the baby’s breathing tube.

However, during the Thirlwall Inquiry, which is examining how Letby’s actions could have been prevented, an email came to light that appeared to contradict his account.

The email, written by Dr Jayaram in 2017, stated that Letby had called him to help after she noticed low levels of oxygen in the baby’s blood. It also put the baby’s death down to “extreme prematurity”, appearing to contradict the claim that Letby had dislodged a breathing tube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Marketing Cheshire, which was responsible for the publicity for Visit Cheshire, said the pictures of Dr Jayaram had been taken before any concerns had come to light surrounding his testimony in the Letby case. The company said Dr Jayaram had been known to the photographer because of his links with amateur dramatics.


A Marketing Cheshire spokesman said: “In 2024, we commissioned new photography to support our promotion of Chester and Cheshire’s attractions. The photographer recruited local actors and models for the shoots, including Dr Jayaram. We have updated the images on our website following a request from Chester Racecourse.”

Chester Racecourse said it had asked for the images to be updated to “avoid upset”.
 
Dr Jayaram was the only medical witness able to link Letby directly to the babies’ deaths. He did not mention the Baby K incident until 2017, at a time when police were hesitant to launch an investigation into the nurse.

Sir David Davis, the former Brexit secretary, has written to Cheshire Constabulary asking the force to launch a formal perjury investigation into Dr Jayaram. Sir David said there was a “clear and concerning” discrepancy between the sworn evidence presented in court, and the email’s contents.

Judges hearing Letby’s appeal said “legitimate criticism” could be made of Dr Jayaram’s evidence.
They wrote: “Although he believed that Letby had deliberately dislodged the endotracheal tube, he had said nothing at the time nor for many months thereafter. There was an inconsistency between his evidence and the contemporaneous records.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Letby is serving 15 whole life terms for the murders of seven babies and the attempted murders of seven more. Since she was convicted, dozens of eminent scientists, doctors, nurses, criminologists and statisticians have come forward to question how the evidence was presented to the jury.

Cheshire Constabulary has said it believed Letby had a fair trial. She has lost two attempts to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal.

Mark McDonald, Letby’s barrister, said Dr Jayaram was “central” to the initial police investigation and told The Telegraph the email played an “important part” in his submission to the CCRC.

The Telegraph has contacted Dr Jayaram for comment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1