I browsed the GMC site
- Notice
Baabaablacksheep320
Well-known member
Wow so maybe he taught her all she knows about insulin …
Fuck me, this behaviour does not suggest someone with humility around their conduct.Oh yes I forgot about that and have now been down a rabbit hole and seen the trust appealed it and only in May 2026 was it refused. I expect they were holding off on the final outcome until that had been exhausted as he was then sacked a month later?
NHS Foundation Trust L (Appellant) v Dr MN (Respondent) - UK Supreme Court
Did the employment contract incorporate a term contained in an internal policy document ‘Handling concerns about the conduct, performance and health of medical and dental staff’ known as E27? Did that term require that the role of Case Manager in an investigation under the policy be carried out...www.supremecourt.uk
It’s sounds like Alder Hey were happy to sweep him bringing Letby there under the rug? But then had to investigate the breach of confidentiality re Facebook messages & he brought a successful claim as they didn’t appoint the correct role to investigate him?
I just saw that on Facebook this morning. How sad.Hi everyone! Hope you’re all doing okayI’m still lurking and keeping up where I can; life has just been rather hectic lately. Anyway, I wasn’t sure if people knew (as it’s on social media now), but Dr Oliver Rackham has passed away.
. Such a sad loss xx
I’m assuming I’m right in knowing who this guy was, going from previous chat on here… but I’m questioning if I’m right because I can’t find one single thing online that suggests he has died .. do the people who know that there’s going to be an inquest into his death and the circumstances etc know him IRL? Or am I just missing something and there has been articles/ posts/ obituary etc
obviously they can’t be posted but if there is something online with his real name then maybe I have the wrong person as nothing is coming up
obviously they can’t be posted but if there is something online with his real name then maybe I have the wrong person as nothing is coming up
Can I ask how you found it? I’m Not even sure where to start
A while back now. She was listed as being on the Ockenden review team - until she wasn't.
The part that isn’t “good” is people “figuring it out” and posting clues and coming very close to committing a criminal offence. The court order has been lifted and so there is absolutely no issue with newspapers reporting it. The original purpose of the order was nothing to do with his wife and children, it was (like many other medical witnesses) to encourage them to give evidence without damage to their professional reputations.
[/QUOTE]
I agree but they were only able to post clues because his name was not redacted that one time!
Also I thought it was everything to do with them, his children being in exams is given as the literal reason it was granted, I thought
Quarantarantino
Well-known member
Please see above
musiclover90
Active member
@sleeplessinwebland thank you!
Danica Catrick
Chatty Member
liked the accessible way he presented the statistics in this video, thanks for sharing.
The comments are full of Letby apologists telling him he's wrong, including Richard Gill
yes Joshua Rozenberg has got involved and published the letters from and to the Chief Constable
AllSeeingEye123
VIP Member
Her number 1 fan has wrote another column about her.
sleeplessinwebland
Well-known member
Dr Jayaram was one of several consultants at the Countess of Chester Hospital who accused Letby of harming babies in 2015 and 2016. His testimony has been questioned, and the reliability of his evidence forms part of Letby’s application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which looks at potential miscarriages of justice.
In the case of one child – Baby K – Dr Jayaram told jurors he had caught Letby standing by the infant’s incubator, not intervening or calling for help, as the baby collapsed. He also accused her of dislodging the baby’s breathing tube.
However, during the Thirlwall Inquiry, which is examining how Letby’s actions could have been prevented, an email came to light that appeared to contradict his account.
The email, written by Dr Jayaram in 2017, stated that Letby had called him to help after she noticed low levels of oxygen in the baby’s blood. It also put the baby’s death down to “extreme prematurity”, appearing to contradict the claim that Letby had dislodged a breathing tube.
In the case of one child – Baby K – Dr Jayaram told jurors he had caught Letby standing by the infant’s incubator, not intervening or calling for help, as the baby collapsed. He also accused her of dislodging the baby’s breathing tube.
However, during the Thirlwall Inquiry, which is examining how Letby’s actions could have been prevented, an email came to light that appeared to contradict his account.
The email, written by Dr Jayaram in 2017, stated that Letby had called him to help after she noticed low levels of oxygen in the baby’s blood. It also put the baby’s death down to “extreme prematurity”, appearing to contradict the claim that Letby had dislodged a breathing tube.
Italian healthcare worker suspected of murdering elderly people by injection with air