Lucy Letby Case #77

[Tofino]

I think she is going to keep repeating this phrase. She has done a few times already.

Good intentions towards who though, is the big question. Because it certainly wasn’t towards the babies!

---
And even now… no mention of the babies within that balance of thinking.

---

Safeguarding referral only done in March 2018?! Can’t wait to see this document!
---

Hopefully we will hear more about how her parents were allowed to be so involved.

 

[O'lee]

Nick De la Poer is ripping Kelly apart if the live updates are anything to go by

 

[MmmB777]

Nick De la Poer is ripping Kelly apart if the live updates are anything to go by

Can’t wait for the family lawyers turn too they’re usually even more brutal

 

[Tofino]

She is coming across terribly. Which is not a surprise.

Here’s some of her best bits.

Did she really say ‘nobody else was coming to me to say they feared coming to me’

“We were not considering this a safeguarding concern” (even in 2017)

Excuses

 

[tay65]

I've followed the reporting until the lunch break and Kelly is coming across terrible and arrogant in her responses to the questions. There was clearly a culture of fear as mentioned earlier by the safeguarding paediatric consultant, whistleblowing wasn't accepted and taken seriously because it was the medical team whistleblowing and Alison Kelly who was from a nursing background simply wasn't having any of it. As for Letby's parents pushing for the consultants to be referred to the GMC well that beggars belief.

 

[MavisBeacon]

Interesting and timely

PS Alison Kelly deserves to be fired into the sun.

 

[MmmB777]

Nothing except 13 dead babies

 

[Ghostranch]

So Alison Kelly:

- Had the best intentions.
- Felt concerns about the rise in mortality didn't constitute a safeguarding issue.
- Felt she had no facts or evidence to base decisions on yet ignored evidence when it was sent to her.
- Felt she didn't need to mention what was going on to the CQC because it was too complex.
- Felt more concerned about Letby's welfare than what was happening to tiny, defenceless babies.

What an absolute POS.

 

[OoglyBoogly]

She is coming across terribly. Which is not a surprise.

Here’s some of her best bits.

Did she really say ‘nobody else was coming to me to say they feared coming to me’

View attachment 3287584

“We were not considering this a safeguarding concern” (even in 2017)

View attachment 3287586

Excuses

View attachment 3287587

View attachment 3287588

Cheeky cow! Was that not, like, of utmost importance???!!!

 

[MmmB777]

I can’t believe what I’ve just read. Two of three triplets have just suddenly died taking the mortality to staggering levels. She’s told the doctors think they were murdered. She’s trying to downplay the seriousness of that situation? In front of the parents? Honestly. I wish they had gone for a retrial for baby Q because that baby was irreparably injured by Letby in the days after this and her and Karen should be looking at prison for their decision.

 

[Tofino]

Is she serious? She wasn’t sure if it was real or a figure of speech but didn’t do anything about it to find out. I feel like she’s jumped on the drawer of doom bandwagon and now struggling to justify why she did nothing if she knew it was being said.

---

I can’t believe what I’ve just read. Two of three triplets have just suddenly died taking the mortality to staggering levels. She’s told the doctors think they were murdered. She’s trying to downplay the seriousness of that situation? In front of the parents? Honestly. I wish they had gone for a retrial for baby Q because that baby was irreparably injured by Letby in the days after this and her and Karen should be looking at prison for their decision.
View attachment 3287649View attachment 3287650

Why do I feel not surprised but also shocked at the same time!

I think I’m not surprised she did nothing. But shocked she’s admitting it! I don’t know if criminal negligence can apply to individuals or just the hospital as a whole but she deserves a criminal charge here. Why the hell did she think the consultants were saying stuff like that? For a joke?

 

[MmmB777]

I can’t believe what I’ve just read. Two of three triplets have just suddenly died taking the mortality to staggering levels. She’s told the doctors think they were murdered. She’s trying to downplay the seriousness of that situation? In front of the parents? Honestly. I wish they had gone for a retrial for baby Q because that baby was irreparably injured by Letby in the days after this and her and Karen should be looking at prison for their decision.
View attachment 3287649View attachment 3287650

Just rereading this again to check I’ve got this right. She acknowledges she “didn’t do anything” and a few sentences later says she felt she was doing the “right things”. Presumably.. nothing was the right thing to do was it? Where do these people get off? How can she sit there and defend that.

 

[AllieBee]

I can’t believe what I’ve just read. Two of three triplets have just suddenly died taking the mortality to staggering levels. She’s told the doctors think they were murdered. She’s trying to downplay the seriousness of that situation? In front of the parents? Honestly. I wish they had gone for a retrial for baby Q because that baby was irreparably injured by Letby in the days after this and her and Karen should be looking at prison for their decision.
View attachment 3287649View attachment 3287650

Surely the very first thing she should have done would be to stop Letby working there while concerns were investigated. And then concerns were first raised not all the way later after Baby P. She is so shockingly blasé and uncaring. She's not coming over well at all.

 

[OoglyBoogly]

If she wasn't sure about what the drawer of doom was, shouldn't she be asking for clarification? What a stupid dumb excuse.

 

[MmmB777]

Surely the very first thing she should have done would be to stop Letby working there while concerns were investigated. And then concerns were first raised not all the way later after Baby P. She is so shockingly blasé and uncaring. She's not coming over well at all.

“It’s very hard to hear” that she didn’t do what she needed to protect babies apparently. bleeping hell another narcissist. Poor you Alison!!! It’s not about you hun. Is it as hard as having your baby murdered? No. Shut the duck up then.

 

[Tofino]

She actually disgusts me.

 

[Apostate]

The second triplet died on a Friday, 24 June 2016. That Sunday (26 June) Dr Brearey invited Kelly and medical director Ian Harvey to a meeting so that the consultants could put their concerns to them directly. Neither executive went. Asked why, Kelly says she does not have access to her diary as part of this inquiry.

she's got to be kidding right?

 

[ThePowderMonkey]

View attachment 3287362

The best of intentions for bleeping Lucy Letby, not the babies you should have been caring for.

It’s not a sincere apology when there’s a “but”. What a horrible horrible witch.

 

[Tofino]

Surely the very first thing she should have done would be to stop Letby working there while concerns were investigated. And then concerns were first raised not all the way later after Baby P. She is so shockingly blasé and uncaring. She's not coming over well at all.

Suspending even an innocent nurse would actually have been in the nurse’s own interest too, as it protects them as well as the babies. If I was innocent I wouldn’t want to work again until it had been resolved because I wouldn’t want to risk being around as a coincidence.
---
Executive directors shouldn’t be making an assumption. Much as I dislike Eirian Powell and Karen Rees for their behaviours , ultimately the buck stops with Alison and she’s wrong to blame them for her negligence.

 

[MavisBeacon]

Shot:

Chaser: