Gawdwhitnext??
Member
Sorry if this has been covered, I can only dip in and out, but do we know if she had paperwork relating to babies who were not attacked?Yeah I don’t think she did spell it correctly. Again, I just think that is a totally huge moment if you consider what she has tried to claim about those sheets and her searches. Yes good point @craftypudding about her saying she had a good memory for them!! It doesn’t mean you’d remember how to spell an unusual name would it! I wonder if it was baby M’s parents as I have a feeling mum is maybe of non English heritage (she said she was praying to ‘my god’). That means keeping those handovers served a purpose. It served a purpose for reliving it for her. They weren’t in her garage or attic, they were under her bed. They were marked keep. They were moved house.
First she claimed not to have any, then maybe she had a few handovers, then she had to accept she had hundreds, then she had to claim she didn’t realise and they just accumulated, then she claimed she didn’t know how to dispose of them, then she claimed not to have a shredder yet it was used and one of only a few items in her room, then she said “ideally” it would be in confidential waste (not ideal- legally has to be), then she claimed not to know the policy, then she claimed on the stand that she had a problem with throwing away paper, then after saying they weren’t significant she called them a collection, then she used language like “they came home with me” as if the paperwork chose to, then she claimed that the documents were still held confidentially in her house and her parents house, then she admitted shredding bank statements but that they’re at the forefront of her mind(careful with her own sensitive data but reckless with others), then after saying handovers aren’t special or memorable she had to admit to having her first one kept away in a special box, then she had to concede that Doctor U would have hold of the paper towel that he used at 8:30 and yet she stayed an hour late and somehow managed to acquire it and keep it under her bed for years. Then you have to believe somebody so worried about being redeployed and supposedly following the rules of the investigation and being isolated, looked around that house knowing she had hundreds of illegal patient sensitive data and STILL could not throw it away. Why?
too special and too important to her. Filed. Stored. Kept close. Referred to for her pleasure.
Also were there any stats about the number of deaths or incidents when she was off duty compared to when she was on?
Thanks!