Right I’m beginning to feel maybe I’m no normal - no one else found themselves balls deep in your pals exes cousins sisters neighbours holiday photos from 2002 and wondered if they enjoyed Lanzarote? 
-
not-a-medical-Dr Jessica Taylor monetising the Russell Brand and David Walliams news is disgusting. She forced her vulnerable employees to sign an NDA to stop them whistle blowing. She threatened survivors of sexual abuse to sue them for “every single one of their assets” if they spoke up. She is one of the most dangerous people in the VAWG sector and does so much harm to women and girls.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The Danish nurse in the new drama took loads home too. It’s alleged she did so obsessionally to study them, study what she could pray on and who would look less suspicious. Just to obsess on their conditions. I think the fb searches, show very obsessional behaviour.
so many ‘WTF’ moments here.
9 searches in 9 minutes. Either she was looking for something very specific and quick glance didn’t find it or they all had their profiles locked down (nothing to see here).
If you are being nosy and there are posts public you would linger a lot longer reading through or looking at photos. (I do anyway
)if profiles were not public and she couldn’t see anything then it’s a bit persistent to keep going back to check.
And now we have TWO LWH families she’s been looking up
really worried for those families.How is that the same?Right I’m beginning to feel maybe I’m no normal - no one else found themselves balls deep in your pals exes cousins sisters neighbours holiday photos from 2002 and wondered if they enjoyed Lanzarote?
the first bit of paperwork was Baby B though. Unless she’s got some psychic ability, how did she know she needed to keep all the paperwork for evidence/build her own timeline when she was only on her second ‘suspicious’ collapse. That paperwork wouldn’t have been available retrospectively.
It happens, but 200 times every month for over 6 months?!Right I’m beginning to feel maybe I’m no normal - no one else found themselves balls deep in your pals exes cousins sisters neighbours holiday photos from 2002 and wondered if they enjoyed Lanzarote?
Yep like the groups from the case in quick succession. What is she gaining from that. It’s really not normal!View attachment 2143125
so many ‘WTF’ moments here.
9 searches in 9 minutes. Either she was looking for something very specific and quick glance didn’t find it or they all had their profiles locked down (nothing to see here).
If you are being nosy and there are posts public you would linger a lot longer reading through or looking at photos. (I do anyway
if profiles were not public and she couldn’t see anything then it’s a bit persistent to keep going back to check.
And now we have TWO LWH families she’s been looking up
I think you're right, her behaviour is completely obsessional!
If you do this 277 times a month you are definitely nowhere near normalRight I’m beginning to feel maybe I’m no normal - no one else found themselves balls deep in your pals exes cousins sisters neighbours holiday photos from 2002 and wondered if they enjoyed Lanzarote?
And it’s parents of babies she treated for a short period maybe years ago? Like wtf. Not an ex is it
or your mate you’re working with anyway or a colleague. So psycho!I think my question would be why would she be thinking as early as 2015 that she would need her own ‘evidence’ - if she was innocent she couldn’t possibly have predicted she would be accused of anything a year later.
that would be like any of us having a concious thought that we need to do something now incase next year we get accused or arrested for a crime. It just doesn’t make sense for an innocent person to have that train of thought.
The judge says this is not a memory test hahahaha
Della I've come to rely on your blunt answers and general rude (as in naughty, not mean) answers. It makes me laugh in an otherwise depressing thread.If you do this 277 times a month you are definitely nowhere near normal
---
Just as well really as she'd deinitely fail based on the police interviews!The judge says this is not a memory test hahahaha
---
Unless she was guilty or knew from the start that her actions were incompetent. Screams guilty behaviour doesn't it
Where I worked we had competency folders. Kind of like work books, that you went through. Some competencies were practical/procedure based (ng feeds, tracheostomies etc), others were about supporting parents/staff etc. You could self assess for some things but had to be evaluated for others, perhaps someone witnessing you observing a procedure then, on a separate occasion, witnessing you doing the procedure. I think we were a bit spoiled to have this level of support, but even then, it was sometimes difficult to get the evaluations required.
The joy of getting near to the end of one folder completely deflated by being handed another bulging tome to complete
The joy of getting near to the end of one folder completely deflated by being handed another bulging tome to complete
But she was collecting them in the moment not retrospectively. Not all of them are relevant to this indictment but they fit in the time frame of the indictment. She knew the time frame because she created the time frame.
Ick just had a vision of her studying them and playing eenie meanie money mo
.Jesus, that's such a good point. I hadn't thought about it that she'd have had to have taken it at the time. I think I was imagining she could print and bring them home. So it is completely indefensible, if that paperwork isn't available retrospectively then there is simply no good reason she should have had it. That's absolutely crazy.
So she’s been whispering and been called out for it by the judge now. This is something my expert witness family member has mentioned before 
Why are these searches so so normal now and such a normal action for her and her police interview is worlds apart from these answers??? Before people said she’d be intimidated in police interview.. is this scenario not intimidating then??
- Status