But you also can’t say that it was. So that’s a moot point.You can’t say the evidence wasn’t tampered with. It was in his car for weeks there’s no proper chain of custody on it. Had it been bagged and submitted immediately you could say that, yes.
The commonwealth absolutely have changed their timeline. I think you said you were new to this trial before? In the first trial they had Trooper Paul testifying that it happened at 12:45, the time has changed a further 3 times since then. That affects everything around the timeline.
47 pieces of tail light were found, 24 of them don’t fit Karen’s tail light and Sgt Barros testified that the tail light was cracked with a small piece missing not entirely broken. Kerry Robert’s also testified that were was a small piece missing. The first tail light pieces were found after Karen’s car was taken.
Higgins said he didn’t call anyone but him and Brian Albert exchanged “butt dials” a few minutes before the Hos long to die in cold search. He said he went there to move cars, he’s on video going into cars and retrieving items. He’s also on video on his phone and there’s another video of him in the sally port on the phone.
Fight gone wrong… why would they have had to ambush him from behind? A punch to the face can knock someone backwards. The medical examiner said the call the hospital got was that he had been at a party and there was an altercation. Dr Renee Stonebridge who examined John’s brain basically said he’d been beaten to a pulp.
Motive; there was prior history between John and Colin Albert. Helena Rafferty also confirmed John had reported drug activity in the area.
Doesn’t even have to have been premeditated, situation flared up and it was a bad accident that got covered up to protect Colin
Higgins was squaring up to John at the bar.
It’s not that far fetched to believe there’s corruption going on in that police department. Not sure if you’re aware of the Sandra Birchmore case which is going on simultaneously.
Sandra was in the police explorers where she met officer Matthew Farwell, he ended up grooming her and having an affair with her for years while his wife was pregnant, passed her to his brother too. Sandra became pregnant and intended on keeping the baby, she was then found dead in her apartment believed to be a suicide but it had been staged by Farwell.
Trooper Guarino was part of that investigation and said he found no communication link between Farwell and Birchmore… the FBI found 32000 messages between them.
So now Trooper Proctor has it right all along? But I thought his testimony wasn’t to be believed? So either everything he says is wrong, or everything he says is correct. It can’t be cherry picked to fit a narrative.
The benefits of hyperfocus ADHD means I can deep dive into something that interests me
Who do you think took pieces of tail light after Karen’s car was taken and managed to plant it on the scene? In front of all the other officers present? It’s already been proven it couldn’t have been Proctor, so who else could have done it?
The cover up story is just too far fetched to make any sort of sense, logistically and circumstantially.
Respectfully, you can have your belief and I’ll have mine, there’s probably no point in conversing over it anymore.