JodieandJail

[Elle Woods]

I thought she did admin for her partners business as her job? I'm sure she said that on a video or in comments previously.

I can't imagine with her previous convictions it would necessarily be easy for her to obtain a job. I can think of a fair few places that wouldn't accept it.

 

[youwhatdahlinn]

I thought she did admin for her partners business as her job? I'm sure she said that on a video or in comments previously.

I can't imagine with her previous convictions it would necessarily be easy for her to obtain a job. I can think of a fair few places that wouldn't accept it.

I think even doing admin would be quite the stretch for her capabilities

I see she's plucked another story out of her a just for content, this time it's her brother's stolen "Rolex" 🥱

 

[Hinchgetsonmynervous]

She just said on her tik tok that this has Been deleted

 

[Elle Woods]

She’s put in her comments that her thread is gone? What’s she on about it’s right here making herself look an even bigger thick twit than we already knew she was

 

[idontgiveamonkeys]

So what exactly is she hopin to achieve by tattle users gettin exposed? If that even happens like getting access to some fake email addresses and IP address (this lie that influencers spread explained here) ?
I’m creased seeing her lurking in the comments of other peoples vids screaming about getting lwyers involved and destroying’" the user who made the thread aye alreet pipe down
You’ve got next level delusions pet
Am pretty sure "doing paperwork" for ya bloke’s dormant company which Companies House says hasn’t done nowt in years ain’t gonna bankroll a legal battle against gdpr law so dream on hen and duck reet off

 

[stardust1]

She’s put in her comments that her thread is gone? What’s she on about it’s right here

it’s because someone in ireland won a court case against tattle and the owner of tattle has been named. Another TikToker has told everyone that there is going to be a full list of names from tattle accounts published.

 

[Rabbit!69]

it’s because someone in ireland won a court case against tattle and the owner of tattle has been named. Another TikToker has told everyone that there is going to be a full list of names from tattle accounts published.

They all clearly need to read the news articles regarding this, one couple successfully sued in 2023 & had the name of the person who owns/started tattle named & that’s all that has happened. The court hearing had nothing more to do with this site other than ensuring the money is paid, they are coming to their own conclusions of what this means which is nothing really.

 

[Hinchgetsonmynervous]

Like this comment if you think her holiday looks tit !

 

[Hinchgetsonmynervous]

This is her bf

 

[idontgiveamonkeys]

This is her bf

He look like the typa bloke that'd have a ham sandwich a bottle of evian and red crisps as his tesco meal deal

 

[Gossipgal.x]

He look like the typa bloke that'd have a ham sandwich a bottle of evian and red crisps as his tesco meal deal

And a banana before his cycle home

 

[Elle Woods]

it’s because someone in ireland won a court case against tattle and the owner of tattle has been named. Another TikToker has told everyone that there is going to be a full list of names from tattle accounts published.

I know that she was putting in her comments and on her video that her thread had been deleted when it hasn’t

 

[youwhatdahlinn]

Can't wait for us to be outed, but at least none of us have ever stolen from the elderly Jodie x

 

[cookies74]

Jodie deffo making an account

 

[youwhatdahlinn]

Jodie deffo making an account

I reckon she's already got one. There's no way she'd be able to search my username like she said she was doing earlier without one

 

[youwhatdahlinn]

Someone posted this on another thread but for the benefit of Jodie who now thinks she's judge bleeping Judy

In the UK our right to free speech is protected by Article 10 of the Human Rights Act. This entitles us to freedom of expression without state interference. This includes unpopular opinions, controversial views or opinions of public entities (this includes people who put their lives online). This does not mean we are protected from consequences of said 'free speech', it does, however, (and crucially) also entitle us to privacy.

Therefore, on gossip sites like Tattle where we are discussing things that people put online (the rule being someone has to have more than 10k followers), press interviews, television appearances, podcasts etc. Everything that is discussed here is either information that Jodie herself has released and has either been shared on her blog, tiktok or from published sources about her crimes.

We would have nothing to discuss if she did not cultivate her own following and keep talking about things publicly. So it goes two ways.

Therefore, because we have not breached or threatened national security, economic security of this country, incited violence or genocide, nor have we committed any hate crimes, our privacy will continue to be protected and freedom of expression will continue because we are doing nothing but the equivalent of chatting on the bus or round the water cooler, just on an online forum

 

[Rabbit!69]

I love it how people don’t think the law applies to tattle regarding gdpr just because they didn’t read the news article properly & are actually celebrating thinking they have won somehow.
I have saw some Irish paralegal talk about the case and state that 99% of what is wrote on here are lies, have you read every thread to get to that opinion.

 

[youwhatdahlinn]

It will burn her not knowing what people are writing on here, she'll be frantically DMing anyone who's commented on her videos that have said they've got an account for a referral code

 

[Gers76]

She probably thinks her thread has gone because you now need to be a member and signed in to see the tik tok threads

 

[rosslee1987]

Someone posted this on another thread but for the benefit of Jodie who now thinks she's judge bleeping Judy

In the UK our right to free speech is protected by Article 10 of the Human Rights Act. This entitles us to freedom of expression without state interference. This includes unpopular opinions, controversial views or opinions of public entities (this includes people who put their lives online). This does not mean we are protected from consequences of said 'free speech', it does, however, (and crucially) also entitle us to privacy.

Therefore, on gossip sites like Tattle where we are discussing things that people put online (the rule being someone has to have more than 10k followers), press interviews, television appearances, podcasts etc. Everything that is discussed here is either information that Jodie herself has released and has either been shared on her blog, tiktok or from published sources about her crimes.

We would have nothing to discuss if she did not cultivate her own following and keep talking about things publicly. So it goes two ways.

Therefore, because we have not breached or threatened national security, economic security of this country, incited violence or genocide, nor have we committed any hate crimes, our privacy will continue to be protected and freedom of expression will continue because we are doing nothing but the equivalent of chatting on the bus or round the water cooler, just on an online forum

Please can you copy and paste this on all the other harmless mats posts who are partying thinking tattle is going to be shut down and all our info will be exposed?