It's sad.
But it doesn't matter if JA was "gorgeous", what mattered was his behaviour. And as has been said many times on this thread, he lied, possibly manipulated, took opportunities from other people and gave false hope to those who found comfort in his "stories".
It's not racist to call out David Burke for the murder and abuse of Celeste. Nor should he be let off for his crimes because he's "gorgeous".
It's not racist for Axel whatshisface to be in prison for his crimes.
And before someone jumps on me, I know what JA has done isn't anywhere near as awful but my point is, it's not racist to question questionable behaviour and to expect someone to be accountable for their actions. You can't just excuse behaviour because of someones race (or disability, or any other protected characteristic..).
This person is writing like JA was murdered. Like he had no choice in his death. But he did. And this is what he chose to do. Nobody forced him.
If this is a genuine professor and OBE, it's easy to see how he got away with it for so long.
Couldn’t agree more with your take on this. What has happened is tragic and very sad for his family, particularly his children. Not one of the people commenting or reporting on him would have wanted this dreadful outcome. But he wasn’t murdered and chose to end his life.
My opinion is that it was a final act of control, he was clearly narcissistic and could not admit defeat. Dying by s***ide is his way of blaming other people for his death, in a “you made me do this” sort of way.
I’m really annoyed to see racism being banded about when public figures are discussing his death. He didn’t die because of racism. He died because of the lies he told and the way he handled the situation. Those lies got him all the way to a position as a professor at Cambridge, who were keen to promote his appointment as the “youngest black professor ever”. That’s what made this newsworthy, compared to other people who have fraudulently secured elevated professional/academic positions. But it is also a label he gladly accepted, happy to use race as an issue when it benefitted him and the fame/notoriety that came with it. Don’t forget he was publishing a book.
So if, in that position as the “youngest black professor ever”, it later transpires that the credentials and qualifications and various other claims that got you there turned out to be a load of crap, then you have to expect widespread criticism for the lies you told that led to you accepting that news-worthy appointment. That, in my view, is where the race issue comes in. It’s not simply because he was black, which is how some people are trying to spin this (and I’m sure JA would if he were here today talking about someone else in the same position). Some people have told stories of him using race discrimination to his advantage by claiming that to challenge him was to be racist. It cannot be a get out of jail free card to allow you to lie and cheat your way to such a position with no accountability.
I am surprised the uni that awarded his doctorate did not act on the blatant plagiarism in his PHD. They should have. Cambridge should have done more to not only scrutinise his achievements and ability to fulfil the role, but also to support him when it all came crashing down, after they were so keen to have him as their black professor poster boy.
I don’t think he was bullied to death. I think he realised his career was over, there was no coming back from it and he couldn’t see a way out.