Don’t be ridiculous , and misogynisticMaybe if she wasn’t doing what the poster says then she would of brought her son up not to be a child killer
Don’t be ridiculous , and misogynisticMaybe if she wasn’t doing what the poster says then she would of brought her son up not to be a child killer
I’ll be what the duck I want love, the woman birthed a child killer, she wasn’t a bleeping saintDon’t be ridiculous , and misogynistic
Absolutely stunned that you can't get his name rightAbsolutely stunned there are people defending a child killers mother on James buglers page… absolutely bleeping stunned…. Who gives a duck about the mother of a boy that tortured a 2 year old to death get a bleeping grip
It’s autocorrect hun.Absolutely stunned that you can't get his name right
Faux outrage, oh pleaseyou must’ve misunderstood, because no one is defending anyone. Simply pulling up the misogynistic and vile language. I’m perfectly capable of telling someone they’re being a misogynist, when needed, I don’t need your faux outrage
I completely understand what you’re saying, but Just because Robert Thompson hasn’t reoffended doesn’t mean he wasn’t the ringleader at the time .I think its quite strange that during the trial it seemed to be portrayed that Robert Thomson was the main culprit and Jon Venables was a poor wee lost soul who'd made friends with the wrong person. I remember the discussions about RT's background being tough but JV's background seemed to have been described as supportive working class.
Fast forward 30yrs and RT seems to have been rehabilitated and living a crime free life. In contrast JV has been in and out of jail for henious crimes. And now it seems that JV was the driving force behind the attack.
To be honest, I doubt we'll ever know the truth.
One thing is certain for me - JV needs to remain locked up permanently.Peodos don't change.
I'm not in favour of the death penalty, apart from child abuse. No hope for people who abuse kids. Better to put them out their misery and keep children safe.
Absolutely. I sometimes wonder if, as described by his legal counsel, he was the 'harder' one, showing less empathy etc, that he was also the one able to move past it all and get on with his own life whereas JV is clearly messed up forever. What a tragic combination they were.I completely understand what you’re saying, but Just because Robert Thompson hasn’t reoffended doesn’t mean he wasn’t the ringleader at the time .
This in a nutshell really. I always thought Thompson was the ringleader and still do. I also think he has very little conscience - remember the comment "if I wanted to kill a kid, I'd kill my own" (his baby brother) or something along those lines, which is incredibly sinister for a ten year old - and is why he's apparently been able to move on with ease, whereas I believe it affected Venables very deeply - remember, he was the only one to say sorry and also continued to have nightmares about James coming back to life if I recall correctly.Absolutely. I sometimes wonder if, as described by his legal counsel, he was the 'harder' one, showing less empathy etc, that he was also the one able to move past it all and get on with his own life whereas JV is clearly messed up forever. What a tragic combination they were.
Is there something on tonight?Watching it now only about 30 mins in so far this always sticks with me