What sub was this posted on and was it recent?
I can understand this if you’re unfamiliar with the industry but it’s a really common thing to leave reviews online to recommend/warn people off certain girls - ukpunters is another big one, amongst others, if you just google ‘entertainer reviews’ lots of forums will come upOn one hand, it reads a little bit like someone who is a fantasist.
A lot of people are realising her account doesn’t add up though. She’s done a lot of “Q&As” addressing, apparently, misconceptions. I think she did a tiktok vid not so long ago insisting she was self made, her accent wasn’t put on, her stuff wasn’t rented. She insisted she was only taking on a “handful” of large clients because she didn’t want to overstretch herself.can’t imagine many people who follow her know she even has a tattle thread (I didn’t until a few weeks ago) so unfortunately this will probably stay unknown to most.. going to be hard to uphold the ‘classy’ ‘old money aesthetic’ when it all comes out
Sellier Knightsbridge is a weird company though. They are careful to insist they aren’t affiliated to the brand of bags they seem to sell, so they aren’t official stockists. Their stuff all seems to be secondhand (nothing wrong with that of course), their branding doesn’t really scream luxury - they just pull loads of weird stunts.I wonder if Sellier Knightsbridge would be so keen to work with her, if they knew? They're the only company she admits to working with. The advent earrings came from there.
I still think their raid was an inside job for publicity.
In respect of Companies House — that’s balance sheet only so it isn’t “incomings and outgoings”. Its assets and liabilities. You could be a business generating £1m in revenue and have only £100 in assets and £0 liabilities. Conversely, you could be a business generating £10k in revenue but have assets of £1m and £500k in liabilities. It’s also only a snapshot in time (the date of the balance sheet).Also… you can 100% see what someone makes via companies house, or at least gauge. Businesses submit accounts which don’t go into granular detail but give a rough idea of profits and overheads.
I used it to do some due diligence on tradespeople I hired for hired renovations and a wedding. My florist for my wedding ripped me off, and I was able to see she was in financial difficulties via companies house, so I’ve used it ever since to get a picture on what’s going on.
she’s talking utter rubbish.
And what can companies house tell us about Voir Social and Isobel?
well for one, the business associated with her personal insta - “Isobel media and consultancy Ltd” is dissolved. its statement of capital was for £1. At the point it was created, she’s used her parents address and not an accountant. So in short… looks as though there wasn’t much money, or an accountant would’ve used their business address and they’d have submitted annual accounts as per their obligations. Even a micro entity has these obligations. And the cash that went through that buisness..was about £200. It owed £200 to be exact.
so she’s dissolved that business in Jan 2024.
at this point she’s created Voir Social Ltd in April 2022 (both as a registered buisness and as an insta account). She uses an accountant to create this business but statement of capital is still £1, not wholly unusual.
companies house have then issued a strike off gazette - presumbably due to lack of filing accounts. But she’s obviously instructed an accountant to negate this.
the company did submit accounts for April 2023 - her incomings were about 20k, but outgoings (debt) was about £10k. So she roughly made about £10k in profit that year. It looks as if this buisness is an accumulation of both her personal insta and any voir social work she apparently gets - the two seem to be intertwined. But these aren’t the records of a thriving buisness with large clients. It looks more like a nice little cash cow but not a thriving business. It definitely doesn’t marry up to the lifestyle she’s showing online.
her accountant seems to be “the showbiz accountant” which is a weird choice… one, it’s based in Liverpool. She has no obvious connections there. It also has no reviews and is tucked away in the Liver building. Very odd.
and why would a marketing agency want a “showbiz” accountant? In a different city?
super interesting. Wish we could pin stuff to the start of threads lol. This should go into a wiki.In respect of Companies House — that’s balance sheet only so it isn’t “incomings and outgoings”. Its assets and liabilities. You could be a business generating £1m in revenue and have only £100 in assets and £0 liabilities. Conversely, you could be a business generating £10k in revenue but have assets of £1m and £500k in liabilities. It’s also only a snapshot in time (the date of the balance sheet).
What Companies House does tell us though is that because she’s filing micro entity accounts (I.e. only needs to file her balance sheet), she meets two of the following criteria: (i) a turnover of £632,000 or less (ii) £316,000 or less on its balance sheet (iii) 10 employees or less.
She says she has a few employees. If we operate on the assumption that all of her items aren’t rented/borrowed (big assumption), then I suspect she needs at least £100k of gross revenue to fund her lifestyle (e.g. £15k watch, £20k bag, thousands on clothes, beauty treatments, couple grand on rent per month, couple grand on eating out, etc.). I say gross revenue because there will be corporation tax, capital gains on the dividend, income tax on anything she’s claiming as income, etc. Effective tax rate probably 50%. Appreciate I’m conflating her income/dividend as a director/shareholder and the business’ revenue itself but it’s representative only. She then needs to pay her staff, marketing, accounting software, etc. All in, if she was genuinely funding her lifestyle herself and paying her staff, I can’t see how she’d be able to turnover anything less than £200k. I don’t think there’s a chance in hell she’s doing that. The fact this is coming from an alternative revenue stream makes so much more sense. The money isn’t coming from her parents — they aren’t rich enough. It’s not self made (apprentice earning £17k). And it’s not from her SM business (as you’ve all pointed out she has no real clients).
She acts like she’s frugal on the car but that’s largely irrelevant with how much she’s (supposedly) spending on other luxury goods. It all makes sense now though.
do you have a grab of the Reddit user who posted the review? Might get more clues there… I have a few guesses but I’m too prudish to sayCan we also address the "took care of a fetish" that the client mentioned in his review. Not a porta potty- too extreme and degrading for our high class entertainer - but maybe a golden shower, or role play?
This is getting even more interesting........![]()
I mean she self published a book with a spelling mistake in the title. I don’t think anyone is seriously buying she’s an ultra successful girlboss. No one sensible anywayi just don't think it's fair to flex on the internet and have people feeling like tit that they can't live the way you do, or for people to be making out like she's an 'inspiration', when it's all a complete lie