Tomatoes in tins is better because you can donate them to a foodbank after...Or tomatoes IN TINS!
...it's what Diana would have wanted
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
...it's what Diana would have wanted
A comment from rg2 about the latest episode of Palace Confidential.
Bear in mind that Rebecca is usually a BP mouthpiece.
IDK why the Palace is 'frustrated'. They should be used to the Harkle tactics by now.
Bear in mind that Rebecca is usually a BP mouthpiece.
IDK why the Palace is 'frustrated'. They should be used to the Harkle tactics by now.
Whether the person or persons lost their jobs and are now unemployable is irrelevant. The London Clinic and ICO both laughably claim that this "sad incident" has been appropriately dealt with, and there's insufficient evidence to support a prosecution. Of course they don't want a trial.
This report is different, and says they succeeded and tried to sell the information. So it's out there.
The media reports very (and the initial DM report varied on the same page).
The actual ICO statement is here
cy.ico.org.uk
It only refers to 'deliberate misuse' of the information (which could be include attempting to access or succeeding) and an 'offer to disclose'.
It also says that 'the ICO issued a now former healthcare professional from London with a formal caution in relation to an offence under section 170(5) of the Data Protection Act 2018'.
The legislation is here for anyone interested https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/170
The ICO has the same powers as the police and CPS here. A caution means that the person has admitted they have committed the crime and now has a criminal record. It will be disclosed on any checks needed for professional jobs.
It is only used for relatively minor crimes, so it is likely that the person was detected before they were successful. Another thing that makes this likely is that the issue was referred to the ICO by the London Clinic themselves - so they probably detected the attempt electronically.
There may be many reasons for the delay. One obvious one is that it is likely that there were professional misconduct proceedings happening in parallel.
This report is different, and says they succeeded and tried to sell the information. So it's out there.
The media reports very (and the initial DM report varied on the same page).
The actual ICO statement is here
ICO statement - conclusion of criminal investigation
It also says that 'the ICO issued a now former healthcare professional from London with a formal caution in relation to an offence under section 170(5) of the Data Protection Act 2018'.
The legislation is here for anyone interested https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/170
The ICO has the same powers as the police and CPS here. A caution means that the person has admitted they have committed the crime and now has a criminal record. It will be disclosed on any checks needed for professional jobs.
It is only used for relatively minor crimes, so it is likely that the person was detected before they were successful. Another thing that makes this likely is that the issue was referred to the ICO by the London Clinic themselves - so they probably detected the attempt electronically.
There may be many reasons for the delay. One obvious one is that it is likely that there were professional misconduct proceedings happening in parallel.
Reitmans should do an up to date advert showing Twerkle in her polo neck wrinkled trousers then showing how much better she looked styled properly in their jeans
Did he ever stop asking?We've heard the bit about wanting Dad's connections to 'open doors' before, but now he allegedly wants money as well.
How about downsizing and cutting back, Harold? Like most people have to.
Prince Harry Reportedly Considering Asking His Father For Help To Ease Money Struggles At Home Amid Mounting Pressure
Prince Harry is reportedly considering seeking assistance from his father, King Charles, amid alleged financial strain affecting his charities and The Prince Harry Reportedly Considering Asking His Fa...www.yahoo.com
Any news about his ANL case? I hope the judge is waiting until H-Bomb is back in the country before he gives his verdict
And a prize for the person who throws the tin that bonks him /her directly on the head which would fetch a fortune at auction, the proceeds from which could then also be donated to charity ….. a win win situation!Tomatoes in tins is better because you can donate them to a foodbank after...
...it's what Diana would have wanted
TRF can't let them sink completely, it would be terrible press and Markles would milk it. So KC is rather stuck, as long as it's his private money then its up to him. Frankly I'd link cash to a gage clause, and insist on monitoring their other financials with a microscope to ensure there's nothing that can come back to bite TRF, but I can see how difficult this is for KC. The reports years ago saying that TRF were hoping they were a success in the US so they'd stay away have the ring of truth. Failed, miserable, destructive, envious, egomaniacal Markles are going to be a pain to deal with. I doubt PPOW wants them anywhere near the UK even for a short time.
Judge …. “Ah Mr Mischief, while you’re here can you just pop into court to hear my judgement on the ANL case? Bring the others along as well, I would like to see your faces when I give my verdict.”Did he ever stop asking?
Any news about his ANL case? I hope the judge is waiting until H-Bomb is back in the country before he gives his verdict
Many years ago I saw an ad for a charity who’s raison d’etre was to support formerly wealthy people who had fallen on hard times to continue living in the standard they had become accustomed to. I was quite gobsmacked - rather than trying to lift people who have struggled all their lives, this charity’s sympathies were for people who had been rich but no longer were. I often think about that charity when I see Hasno and the Ho demanding money. Some people feel they are somehow entitled to a wealthy lifestyle, even if they can’t sustain it themselves.Well this is another piece to fill column inches. It is obvious to anybody with half a brain that this is the main, and probably only, reason why he wants to reconcile with his father. After his last visit with Papa it was reported that as he left KC was heard to say something like “I told him I am not a bank” so he was asking for money at that meeting and he (or her) doesn’t appear to have been cutting back or done any downsizing from that day to this.
They have failed in their projects, they are lazy and work-shy but now expect handouts to keep them living in the luxury they think they are entitled to. This attitude makes my blood boil
That's incredible, how the hell would that charity have been given charitable status 
I think you are right but, as they say up north, I think KC will let them ‘stew in their own juice’ a bit longer. I really don’t think they have learnt their lesson yet and need to fall quite a bit further before he steps in to help with his own money.
The gag clause will be a definite and, if he has any sense, any money will be drip fed to them and stopped at a moment‘s notice if they say anything. A lump sum would be gone in weeks ……. they act like teenagers so need to be treated like teenagers.
If it were me, I would purchase the kind of property in California that Twerkle would give both H-Bombs nuts for.
It would remain property of the crown so utilities, taxes etc. and any maintenance work, remodelling etc. would be approved, organised and paid for by the Crown.
That way, the Harkles have somewhere to live without any cost to themselves. Everything else, they pay for.
The Crown wins by having an investment property, the Harkles win because a huge expense is taken from them and everybody else wins because Twerkle can't divorce H-Bomb without losing her dream home
It was probably forty years ago, and I suppose things were less regulated back then. I’ve never seen anything of them since.That's incredible, how the hell would that charity have been given charitable status
If they were given a lump sum they (she) would spend it all and then they would be back demanding more. It would never end. They would never be satisfied with less than a billion.
The Society for Distressed Gentlefolks I think it was called. I would imagine it was a case of like looking after like.
Was it a charity for distressed gentlefolk? Which is how I consider myself actually.
It may have changed its name and its charitable purpose has been brought up to date
e.g. https://www.elizabethfinn.co.uk/about-us/our-history/
In my lower teen years a friend talked me into going for a riding lesson.
Because I was small I got to ride a cute little creamy coloured shetland cross named Honey.
So about 6 or 7 of us got led around the schooing yard for 20 or 30 minutes at walk and trot then we were taken for a led walk through a small bush yard with wooden rail sleepers on the ground.
In a yard adjacent to the bush block was what looked like a giant red horse, that was called Red, from the little pony I was on.
The big red horse came rushing to the fence and little Honey started prancing and trying to rear.
The girl leading me said the giant Red and the cute little bitty Honey were wanting to fight because the mare in front was in season.
Yes Red and Honey were both stallions. WT
I later found out that the girl in charge doing the lessons was doing it to pay for her boyfriend's showjumper (Red) show fees.
Because I was small I got to ride a cute little creamy coloured shetland cross named Honey.
So about 6 or 7 of us got led around the schooing yard for 20 or 30 minutes at walk and trot then we were taken for a led walk through a small bush yard with wooden rail sleepers on the ground.
In a yard adjacent to the bush block was what looked like a giant red horse, that was called Red, from the little pony I was on.
The big red horse came rushing to the fence and little Honey started prancing and trying to rear.
The girl leading me said the giant Red and the cute little bitty Honey were wanting to fight because the mare in front was in season.
Yes Red and Honey were both stallions. WT
I later found out that the girl in charge doing the lessons was doing it to pay for her boyfriend's showjumper (Red) show fees.
I always assumed so. I couldn’t imagine anyone else donating to them.
I am sure after the investigation it was found that the said person was successful.Whether the person or persons lost their jobs and are now unemployable is irrelevant. The London Clinic and ICO both laughably claim that this "sad incident" has been appropriately dealt with, and there's insufficient evidence to support a prosecution. Of course they don't want a trial.
This report is different, and says they succeeded and tried to sell the information. So it's out there.
The media reports very (and the initial DM report varied on the same page).
The actual ICO statement is here
It only refers to 'deliberate misuse' of the information (which could be include attempting to access or succeeding) and an 'offer to disclose'.ICO statement - conclusion of criminal investigation
It also says that 'the ICO issued a now former healthcare professional from London with a formal caution in relation to an offence under section 170(5) of the Data Protection Act 2018'.
The legislation is here for anyone interested https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/170
The ICO has the same powers as the police and CPS here. A caution means that the person has admitted they have committed the crime and now has a criminal record. It will be disclosed on any checks needed for professional jobs.
It is only used for relatively minor crimes, so it is likely that the person was detected before they were successful. Another thing that makes this likely is that the issue was referred to the ICO by the London Clinic themselves - so they probably detected the attempt electronically.
There may be many reasons for the delay. One obvious one is that it is likely that there were professional misconduct proceedings happening in parallel.
I think it was mentioned on one of H&M threads or the RF.
But it was definitely on the news here.
As an average citizen of the UK, I think that my current feelings of being fed up with the Royal circus must be quite common. I wish the media would just shut up and stop monetising Harkles gossip.
It is understandable why KC3 would want to maintain at least a passing acquaintance with his grandchildren, and the British public has no business objecting to whatever he chooses to do PRIVATELY to enable that relationship. KC3 is probably trying to do something now, but the continual frustration must be that the Harkles publicity machine chronically violates any principles established to in fact keep arrangements private.
Harry obviously cannot dictate how the ILBW behaves, or what instructions she issues to her staff, or what social media crap she creates. She just can’t help her greedy self, and I suspect, neither can Harry. The Harkles have no stake in maintaining the Royal family’s dignity or public trust. THIS is exactly why they need to be cut out.
So, whatever arrangements happen, we all know they will be leaked/plastered all over the place and the waters once again muddied with speculation.
So, because the Palace knows full well that the majority of the public have NO interest in seeing either of the Harkles or their offspring in an official royal role, then the trick is going to be to slam the door firmly shut on any new initiatives being handed to Harry. Public support for the whole Royal thing will wear thin if he is brought back. Treasonous pest he is.
Of the long list of his violations of trust, he has even been recorded expressing his resentment of having to perform patron duties like supporting charitable fundraising. And he‘s been such a sucker for poor advice about running charities or even understanding corporate governance. And he’s clearly had funding from parties who would love to stir the British pot.
The thing is, at this point, Harry is not only unpopular, but he has definitively proven his own stupidity, lack of discernment, unwillingness to read any room, and basically his unmitigated greed. He enjoys no level of public trust, what’s the point in keeping those hopes alive? He needs a billionaire wife.
I used to wholeheartedly support the Royal function because of its diplomatic usefulness, but if they insist on forcing Harry into the mix, then they have violated the moral compass role which is central to peoples’ trust that Royal patrons act with no commercial gain in mind. Might as well make some professor of constitutional history the monarch.
It galls me that so many faithful, hard working royals have given lifetimes of work to bettering our country, and still do, but that the current monarch just cannot seem to act decisively to oust, permanently, another rotten apple from the barrel. The Harkles children do not particularly matter in the scheme of things…impossible to imagine a scenario where the public is asked to put the crown on King Archie’s head.
Since IG is the only door still ajar, it is highly likely Harry will eventually fall on his sword about all that - either through fraud revelations, or simply via the organisation finding a new patron. Who knows the politics behind that, but what we do know is that Harkles have had luxurious finding from IG while the veterans themselves have paid their own way in many cases.
The problem remains…resentful, extended family. What do other wealthy people do with their loser offspring? Maybe hand him an annual income, privately funded, to ensure the grandchildren aren’t homeless. Put the capital in a trust so Douchess has no claims, and take the lot of them off the succession.
I think the public and the government would heave a collective sigh of relief, as they did when Andy was turfed.
It is understandable why KC3 would want to maintain at least a passing acquaintance with his grandchildren, and the British public has no business objecting to whatever he chooses to do PRIVATELY to enable that relationship. KC3 is probably trying to do something now, but the continual frustration must be that the Harkles publicity machine chronically violates any principles established to in fact keep arrangements private.
Harry obviously cannot dictate how the ILBW behaves, or what instructions she issues to her staff, or what social media crap she creates. She just can’t help her greedy self, and I suspect, neither can Harry. The Harkles have no stake in maintaining the Royal family’s dignity or public trust. THIS is exactly why they need to be cut out.
So, whatever arrangements happen, we all know they will be leaked/plastered all over the place and the waters once again muddied with speculation.
So, because the Palace knows full well that the majority of the public have NO interest in seeing either of the Harkles or their offspring in an official royal role, then the trick is going to be to slam the door firmly shut on any new initiatives being handed to Harry. Public support for the whole Royal thing will wear thin if he is brought back. Treasonous pest he is.
Of the long list of his violations of trust, he has even been recorded expressing his resentment of having to perform patron duties like supporting charitable fundraising. And he‘s been such a sucker for poor advice about running charities or even understanding corporate governance. And he’s clearly had funding from parties who would love to stir the British pot.
The thing is, at this point, Harry is not only unpopular, but he has definitively proven his own stupidity, lack of discernment, unwillingness to read any room, and basically his unmitigated greed. He enjoys no level of public trust, what’s the point in keeping those hopes alive? He needs a billionaire wife.
I used to wholeheartedly support the Royal function because of its diplomatic usefulness, but if they insist on forcing Harry into the mix, then they have violated the moral compass role which is central to peoples’ trust that Royal patrons act with no commercial gain in mind. Might as well make some professor of constitutional history the monarch.
It galls me that so many faithful, hard working royals have given lifetimes of work to bettering our country, and still do, but that the current monarch just cannot seem to act decisively to oust, permanently, another rotten apple from the barrel. The Harkles children do not particularly matter in the scheme of things…impossible to imagine a scenario where the public is asked to put the crown on King Archie’s head.
Since IG is the only door still ajar, it is highly likely Harry will eventually fall on his sword about all that - either through fraud revelations, or simply via the organisation finding a new patron. Who knows the politics behind that, but what we do know is that Harkles have had luxurious finding from IG while the veterans themselves have paid their own way in many cases.
The problem remains…resentful, extended family. What do other wealthy people do with their loser offspring? Maybe hand him an annual income, privately funded, to ensure the grandchildren aren’t homeless. Put the capital in a trust so Douchess has no claims, and take the lot of them off the succession.
I think the public and the government would heave a collective sigh of relief, as they did when Andy was turfed.