Harry & Meghan #583 The Uninvited.

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I don't believe this story as told. Someone cautioned who "had possession" (printed?) of her medical records and planned to sell them, had maybe shown them to a buyer? Who else had seen them? This report imo is in response to something else that they thought would go away and hasn't, or it didn't happen and the story of the "caution" is to downplay the hacking to the level of a parking-ticket for a specific reason. Nothing to see here, move on.

It's not credible that the hacker saw the records and was "cautioned", as it's a criminal offence. Did the hacker see any other patient's medical records at the same time?

From the report

"The ICO, which is the UK's privacy and data protection watchdog, said a caution was 'the appropriate and proportionate enforcement response'.
'Based on the evidence available, we did not identify any failings that would meet the threshold for regulatory enforcement.'
I haven’t read the article, but maybe they don’t use electronic records for the Royal Family, so someone was able to photocopy some written notes?

Hope all goes well @flugella
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
Barkjack rarely wrong.
This is a good one.
Idk, “if staff don’t mention it”, how did it reach Bark-Up-The-Wrong-Tree-Jack? As you can tell, i don’t trust this account, as i find i must take everything they say with a handful of salt, and right now i’m on cortisone

Back to our Smegs, i don’t think she’ll travel as an utmost emergency will arrise as she will be driving 4 hours to get the flatties milkshakes and discover, to her horror, midway that lunchboxes are no longer a thing; meanwhile the flatties are running barefoot through the backrooms of Disney Land.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 30
It's interesting about the Matcha chat on here.
There was a panel of 3 (newsreader and two others) discussing Pauline Hanson's speech, a Myer t-shirt and Matcha.

One of the panel said they bought their husband the traditional Matcha and he said it tasted like dirt. The newsreader said there was a difference between traditional and the sweetened Matcha you get at McDonalds.

The newsreader said their is a shortage of Matcha. Some places in Japan have sold out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19
I haven’t read the article, but maybe they don’t use electronic records for the Royal Family, so someone was able to photocopy some written notes?

Hope all goes well @flugella
I don't know what the article has said but if they were part of Catherine's medical team they would need access to her records so I think they would have access to any records print or electronic.

I can access my medical reports and images for a certain amount of time on the website that takes the images with a user name and password.

I remember at the time one of the staff had got into Catherine's records at the hospital and staff were fired.

I can't understand why people are questioning this now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24
If true that the Harkles are all going to be back in the UK, I do hope they get an unmistakable message from the public that they are not welcomed. I also hope that the weak, dumb king receives a very clear message: the UK should make very obvious that they do not accept a Monarchy where Hazno and his ILBW have space and consume public funding. I am not British so this is just my opinion, but to welcome them back - without ever getting an apology for being called a racist country - would be seen as an admission of guilt.

As for the weak, dumb king, for someone who spent a considerable part of his adult life trying (by any means) to control and manipulate the narrative around his now wife, he should know better than to provide the money obsessed duo the opportunity for a new (or continued) narrative about the real Royals.

Every time KC allows the Monarchy to be mixed with the (failed) commercial efforts of the ILBW selling rotten jams and lousy candles he is devaluating the institution he has the duty to defend.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 43
Also, I was reading that the news was released (allegedly from Montecito) as William and Catherine arrived to the Royal Ascot. If true, which I believe it is as this is their MO for years now, this should show to the king - as if he doesn't have enough evidence - how much he should distrust his darling boy and his ILBW.

I hope that William and Catherine have a strong alibi for being miles away at every step of this trip so they can't have anything on them apart from "we were ignored" which I would totally support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 38
We need a sweepstake.

Place your bets:

  1. The entire family turns up
  2. H-Bomb & Twerkle only (security insufficient for the cardboards)
  3. H-Bomb then Twerkle makes a late appearance (flatpack suffering minor illness ...woodworm or something)
  4. H-Bomb alone
  5. None of them
  6. Something else

They're getting desperate so I think 2 or 3.

Added to which, H-Bomb & Twerkle are, at some point, going to try to visit Eton and announce they were considering sending the boy genius Aldi but William said no :ROFLMAO:
My suspicion is a last minute excuse why it's not safe for her and the flatties to come so Harold has to come alone (if at all).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
So, if mrs Markle comes to Birmingham with Harry, what would you write in your placard?

I thought of a great one as I was falling asleep last night, but can’t for the life of me remember it this morning.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 29
Are we still talking about measurements or have I missed something..
We‘ve moved on from dollops and smidgens to Smegs calling herself and the Matcha woman ‘gals’ even though both are well into their 40s! Other more suitable names were suggested such as ‘biddys’ or ‘bints’. The ‘chaps’ or ‘ladies’ were names suggested by @One eyebrow raised but I’m not sure either fit the bill! 😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 19
All this talk about the Harkles plus 2 visiting next month ….. this pic is a reminder of the ‘crowds’ that turned out to see Hazno when he visited Nottingham last year. And let’s not forget the ‘crowds’ who turned out to see them in Australia. Granted if the ILBW plus 2 turned up and did a walkabout there would be other people wanting to see them, more out of curiosity than anything else but I honestly can’t see that happening.

She may be brass necked enough to come but their ’kids’ will not ….. a reason for them not coming will be rolled out just before the day. In a way I hope she comes and is booed so loud that they both finally realise that they are no longer welcome in the UK.

JMO but I don’t think KC wants to see them, he already knows it‘s main purpose will be a ‘money begging’ visit. If he was desperate to meet any fictitious grand kids they would have come to some arrangement when him and Camilla were in the USA earlier this year.

IMG_2753.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 36
So, if mrs Markle comes to Birmingham with Harry, what would you write in your placard?

I thought of a great one as I was falling asleep last night, but can’t for the life of me remember it this morning.
Not our Grifters!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 37
I don't believe this story as told. Someone cautioned who "had possession" (printed?) of her medical records and planned to sell them, had maybe shown them to a buyer? Who else had seen them? This report imo is in response to something else that they thought would go away and hasn't, or it didn't happen and the story of the "caution" is to downplay the hacking to the level of a parking-ticket for a specific reason. Nothing to see here, move on.

It's not credible that the hacker saw the records and was "cautioned", as it's a criminal offence. Did the hacker see any other patient's medical records at the same time?

From the report

"The ICO, which is the UK's privacy and data protection watchdog, said a caution was 'the appropriate and proportionate enforcement response'.
'Based on the evidence available, we did not identify any failings that would meet the threshold for regulatory enforcement.'
I’m pretty sure it was Jessica Krause also known as House in Habit on Instagram. I took screenshots at the time of her boasting that she had intel on Catherine‘s real illness and that she would be revealing all. She likes dangling carrots, does Jessica. More recently she’s been teasing her IG followers about Meghan‘s past on the yachts (which has never cone to fruition) and people like Dan Wootton have flocked to her watering hole. witches.
This woman was instrumental in threatening to reveal Catherine‘s illness, and I believe that’s the reason why Catherine had to come out and do that announcement. That along with the pressure of people joking about her whereabouts and the complete overreaction over the doctored photo on Mother’s Day. Once the announcement came out, Jessica started shitting her pants knowing that things could go legal and immediately started to backtrack, and posted that she was not a journalist, but just a gossip bleep (with a substack). I did take screen grabs and I’ve tried to find them on the thread around the time of Kate’s announcement but I just cannot find them. Of course I’m paranoid it’s been deleted but I should’ve asked for it to be put into the media gallery so we had receipts.

This evil self seeking witch forced Catherine’s hand unduly. Don’t trust a word that comes from Jessica Krauss/House in Habit.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 27
The staff person lost their job, and most likely their professional license (if applicable) and, with this on their record, is now unemployable in their profession. So they didn't get off scot-free, though I agree that criminal charges would be appropriate. I'm wondering if Catherine and William made a strategic decision to not pursue charges in order to minimize the attention given to this breach and to Catherine's condition.
Yes I think you're right. Everything they do screams 'less attention, less fuss, head down and work'. They wouldn't want all the press coverage, and continuing speculation about POW health after everything they've been through. It would be another assault.

Someone posted a while ago that Harry is the security threat, hence him being kept at a distance. I think this has the ring of truth about it. Harry banging on about needing security, whereas the reality is that the RF need security to protect them from Markles. He can't be trusted at the best of times, and now he's desperate as things are falling apart around him so he's even more likely to leak information, and invade his families privacy. They must keep all details of KC, and POW health away from him, or it would be all over the press in a minute.

Its entirely possible that next summer the IG games will also be the first public appearance of Archie and Lily. Markle would want a big event to overshadow and control. Front page news on rags like the DM would be a big win for her. She can't keep them hidden forever, so if they come, I think it will be the beginning of properly merching the kids. My money is still on just Harold arriving and talk of the whole family coming is all just being attention seeking PR but they are in need of new and positive PR before they sink to the bottom of oblivion and pics of the kids might achieve that for a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 25