You will never be mistaken for her, even in a police foot identity parade. Your feet are clean.I have a shameful confession… please don’t judge me but these are my feet! Yes I have Morton’s toe. I am ashamedNo however I am not MM as you can see from my cat, I do not have a beagle.
View attachment 4022924
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I love your flowery sandalsI have a shameful confession… please don’t judge me but these are my feet! Yes I have Morton’s toe. I am ashamed
View attachment 4022924
The bus wore it better
It was second only to the carolina herrera red dress! Her stylists are clearly working from the inside
Catching up so fully expect to find this has already been pointed out several times
, but...H-Bomb looks like he's been crying and/or he's barely holding himself together.
Added to Twerkle death spiral posting of random photos and videos it would appear that things aren't going well at all.
Oh dear
Looks filtered or something, no freckles or moles. Maybe "no makeup" makeup.
Ah thank you! Plus my cats bumI love your flowery sandals
seems to have detracted from my feet which I’m grateful for pmsl 
nah I don’t mind having Morton’s toe.. there’s nothing I can do so might as well accept it.Yes Meegains feet are always a bit grubby looking @TheMiceInTheShed i agree!
She needs a good dip!
Sheep dip.Ah thank you! Plus my cats bum
Yes Meegains feet are always a bit grubby looking @TheMiceInTheShed i agree!
She needs a good dip!
Tom Sykes Royalist Channel, on Harry's security.
Tom detailed the timeline of the court cases and appeals. The defining moment was when Harry wrote to the Home Secretary in October 2025 to formally request a security review.
As Tom predicted, there will be no restoration of IPP as that would confuse status with protection. They can't afford to have anything happen to Harry on UK soil, so a beefed-up security arrangement will be in place with 4 RPOs instead of 2. He has to give 28 days' notice of arrival, an itinerary, and there are caveats and conditions.
Tom quoted Richard Eden on a source close to Chuck, that Harry has persuaded KC to support IG and stand with him when IG opens next year. This will go down like a lead balloon in the UK and everywhere else. There's a perception that a deal has been done behind closed doors by Chuck to accommodate and protect Harry, and bring him back under Project Thaw. Tom believes this is happening and that it's no longer a fringe theory.
His reasoning:
︎Harry got a RMB review, not normal.
︎KC said he supports IG and that a lot of taxpayers' money has been spent.
︎KC's King's Speech on anti-Semitism echoed what Harry had said earlier. Then New Statesman ran an article about anti-Semitism, not normally Harry's remit, then after the Golders Green attack KC visits GG.
William thinks KC getting involved with IG is a bad idea and wants the Sussexes ostracised like the Windsors. All Harry's operations are in the UK, and he'd love to live here part of the year as a quasi-RF member free to come and go, which would be a nightmare for BP.
One important point is that KC has come through his cancer treatment very well, but the press won't report this. He's out of the woods and is taking back control. We were told that W&C were wielding a lot of influence and power and would be on the throne sooner than expected. KC has said "No So Fast, Pal, I'm still King and this is the way I want it and I want Harry back in the UK."
Harry will be in Birmingham on 10th July without his family and could be here for a week. One year to go before the Games. Tom doubts we'll hear anything further from Ravec, they've given him increased security and that's it. If his family is with him this July and the security is with all the bells and whistles, then he's been given the full package though Tom thinks it unlikely.
Tom detailed the timeline of the court cases and appeals. The defining moment was when Harry wrote to the Home Secretary in October 2025 to formally request a security review.
As Tom predicted, there will be no restoration of IPP as that would confuse status with protection. They can't afford to have anything happen to Harry on UK soil, so a beefed-up security arrangement will be in place with 4 RPOs instead of 2. He has to give 28 days' notice of arrival, an itinerary, and there are caveats and conditions.
Tom quoted Richard Eden on a source close to Chuck, that Harry has persuaded KC to support IG and stand with him when IG opens next year. This will go down like a lead balloon in the UK and everywhere else. There's a perception that a deal has been done behind closed doors by Chuck to accommodate and protect Harry, and bring him back under Project Thaw. Tom believes this is happening and that it's no longer a fringe theory.
His reasoning:
︎Harry got a RMB review, not normal.︎KC said he supports IG and that a lot of taxpayers' money has been spent.︎KC's King's Speech on anti-Semitism echoed what Harry had said earlier. Then New Statesman ran an article about anti-Semitism, not normally Harry's remit, then after the Golders Green attack KC visits GG. William thinks KC getting involved with IG is a bad idea and wants the Sussexes ostracised like the Windsors. All Harry's operations are in the UK, and he'd love to live here part of the year as a quasi-RF member free to come and go, which would be a nightmare for BP.
One important point is that KC has come through his cancer treatment very well, but the press won't report this. He's out of the woods and is taking back control. We were told that W&C were wielding a lot of influence and power and would be on the throne sooner than expected. KC has said "No So Fast, Pal, I'm still King and this is the way I want it and I want Harry back in the UK."
Harry will be in Birmingham on 10th July without his family and could be here for a week. One year to go before the Games. Tom doubts we'll hear anything further from Ravec, they've given him increased security and that's it. If his family is with him this July and the security is with all the bells and whistles, then he's been given the full package though Tom thinks it unlikely.
Anything Tom Sykes reports should be taken with a grain of salt. He was the one who said Catherine would be “back with a bang” at Easter, claiming her friends told him that. A day later she released her video message announcing she had cancer.Tom Sykes Royalist Channel, on Harry's security.
Tom detailed the timeline of the court cases and appeals. The defining moment was when Harry wrote to the Home Secretary in October 2025 to formally request a security review.
As Tom predicted, there will be no restoration of IPP as that would confuse status with protection. They can't afford to have anything happen to Harry on UK soil, so a beefed-up security arrangement will be in place with 4 RPOs instead of 2. He has to give 28 days' notice of arrival, an itinerary, and there are caveats and conditions.
Tom quoted Richard Eden on a source close to Chuck, that Harry has persuaded KC to support IG and stand with him when IG opens next year. This will go down like a lead balloon in the UK and everywhere else. There's a perception that a deal has been done behind closed doors by Chuck to accommodate and protect Harry, and bring him back under Project Thaw. Tom believes this is happening and that it's no longer a fringe theory.
His reasoning:
William thinks KC getting involved with IG is a bad idea and wants the Sussexes ostracised like the Windsors. All Harry's operations are in the UK, and he'd love to live here part of the year as a quasi-RF member free to come and go, which would be a nightmare for BP.
One important point is that KC has come through his cancer treatment very well, but the press won't report this. He's out of the woods and is taking back control. We were told that W&C were wielding a lot of influence and power and would be on the throne sooner than expected. KC has said "No So Fast, Pal, I'm still King and this is the way I want it and I want Harry back in the UK."
Harry will be in Birmingham on 10th July without his family and could be here for a week. One year to go before the Games. Tom doubts we'll hear anything further from Ravec, they've given him increased security and that's it. If his family is with him this July and the security is with all the bells and whistles, then he's been given the full package though Tom thinks it unlikely.
He has also repeatedly claimed that King Charles was “dying,” which clearly turned out not to be the case. Now he is presenting a new narrative about the King “taking back control.”
These are just a couple of examples, but his track record speaks for itself. I don’t understand why anyone would treat his reporting as reliable.
Harry's use of this name doesn't have anything to do with Spike Lee. Nobody owns the name Spike anymote than they own any other name. There was a guy called Simon at my school who used it as a nickname back in the 70s!‘Spike’ was Hazno’s nickname from about 2003, even his security guards used it.
I wonder if he just invented the name to use on fb because of this rather than knowing that it was actually somebody’s name? I bet he did but again, wouldn’t you think he would check first before using it……. No, this is Harry we’re talking about.
I call bull on this story. If Spike Lee didn't want to embrace Harry it's probably for other reasons rather than his Facebook alias.
There is definitely some reason as to why Spike wasn't happy with Harry yesterday. Here he is with Catherine back in 2019.
I’ve got silly feet and my local nail bar ‘affectionately’ refer to me as tiny toes. I’m very top heavy as it is and so I think this imbalance is what makes me so clumsy.Ah thank you! Plus my cats bum
Yes Meegains feet are always a bit grubby looking @TheMiceInTheShed i agree!
She needs a good dip!
BUT I am aware of the failings of my feet and so I cover them when needed - not jam them into open toed shoes, certainly not in a shorter hem dress for an evening event. She just hasn’t got a clue has our Rachel.
Dip tit.
Tom Sykes is not any more reliable than any other of the royal commentators.
Regarding his specific reasoning on this occasion:
︎Harry got a RMB review, not normal.
︎KC said he supports IG and that a lot of taxpayers' money has been spent.
︎KC's King's Speech on anti-Semitism echoed what Harry had said earlier. Then New Statesman ran an article about anti-Semitism, not normally Harry's remit, then after the Golders Green attack KC visits GG
As part of its terms of reference, RAVEC is required to 'agree a framework for protection and take decisions ... ; review the framework and decisions taken under it regularly'. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b4e3be5274a319e77e667/7367-RAVEC-TOR.pdf
Harry, having stepped back from being a working royal and moved out of the country (so away from RAVEC's usual remit), had a bespoke arrangement. RAVEC was found not to have acted unlawfully in doing this.
People familiar with the subject have suggested that there would typically be a brief annual review, with a formal review every 5 years.
The only comments that KC3 appears to have made (according to a friend, so not on record, and not endorsed by BP in the report) are that Invictus is a worthy cause, he hopes the Games will be a success for Birmingham, and he's aware that a lot of taxpayers' money has been spent on it.
KC3 has long been a supporter of British Jews. He visited Heaton Park Synagogue in Manchester in October after the horrible attack there, and was very welcome. He has been a patron of World Jewish Relief for over a decade, is patron of Council of Christians and Jews, and became patron of Community Security Trust earlier this year.
I don't think what Harry does or doesn't say on any subject has any relevance to what the King does, least of all on a subject as important as this.
Regarding IPP, this keeps coming up.
There is no chance of RAVEC, the Home Office or anyone else giving Harry IPP status - it's not in their remit.
International protected person is defined in international law, in a UN Convention, later ratified by UK Act of Parliament (Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978).
Harry doesn't fit the criteria. The only time he would have done was if he was representing the monarch on an official overseas tour (or with him in his household on an official overseas tour).
Regarding his specific reasoning on this occasion:
︎Harry got a RMB review, not normal.︎KC said he supports IG and that a lot of taxpayers' money has been spent.︎KC's King's Speech on anti-Semitism echoed what Harry had said earlier. Then New Statesman ran an article about anti-Semitism, not normally Harry's remit, then after the Golders Green attack KC visits GGAs part of its terms of reference, RAVEC is required to 'agree a framework for protection and take decisions ... ; review the framework and decisions taken under it regularly'. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b4e3be5274a319e77e667/7367-RAVEC-TOR.pdf
Harry, having stepped back from being a working royal and moved out of the country (so away from RAVEC's usual remit), had a bespoke arrangement. RAVEC was found not to have acted unlawfully in doing this.
People familiar with the subject have suggested that there would typically be a brief annual review, with a formal review every 5 years.
The only comments that KC3 appears to have made (according to a friend, so not on record, and not endorsed by BP in the report) are that Invictus is a worthy cause, he hopes the Games will be a success for Birmingham, and he's aware that a lot of taxpayers' money has been spent on it.
KC3 has long been a supporter of British Jews. He visited Heaton Park Synagogue in Manchester in October after the horrible attack there, and was very welcome. He has been a patron of World Jewish Relief for over a decade, is patron of Council of Christians and Jews, and became patron of Community Security Trust earlier this year.
I don't think what Harry does or doesn't say on any subject has any relevance to what the King does, least of all on a subject as important as this.
Regarding IPP, this keeps coming up.
There is no chance of RAVEC, the Home Office or anyone else giving Harry IPP status - it's not in their remit.
International protected person is defined in international law, in a UN Convention, later ratified by UK Act of Parliament (Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978).
Harry doesn't fit the criteria. The only time he would have done was if he was representing the monarch on an official overseas tour (or with him in his household on an official overseas tour).
One important point is that KC has come through his cancer treatment very well, but the press won't report this.
This update, where he talked as part of the Stand up to Cancer campaign about his treatment going well so it could now be reduced?
www.bbc.co.uk
Tom doubts we'll hear anything further from Ravec
We won't hear anything from RAVEC. RAVEC doesn't comment on security. If anyone has said there is an increase, or there are 4 PPOs instead of 2, it's not RAVEC.
No organisation that takes security in any way seriously makes comments like that. RAVEC professionals are the best of the best.
This update, where he talked as part of the Stand up to Cancer campaign about his treatment going well so it could now be reduced?
King Charles shares 'good news' that his cancer treatment will be reduced
The 77-year-old says the milestone is a "personal blessing" and testimony to advances in cancer care.
www.bbc.co.uk
Tom doubts we'll hear anything further from Ravec
We won't hear anything from RAVEC. RAVEC doesn't comment on security. If anyone has said there is an increase, or there are 4 PPOs instead of 2, it's not RAVEC.
No organisation that takes security in any way seriously makes comments like that. RAVEC professionals are the best of the best.
Will he ever see the light and realise that he should have listened to his family? Maybe when she finally does move on or when he's an old man.
Shamelessly filched from Reddit
Harry & Meghan #584: When “pea brain” meets “me brain”
Harry & Meghan #584: When “pea brain” meets “me brain”
I have it too and am glad that there are others coming out about it on here. We have kept our toes in the dark while reading all about them on here but there are nice people who have it too.I have a shameful confession… please don’t judge me but these are my feet! Yes I have Morton’s toe. I am ashamed
View attachment 4022924