I mentioned a while ago, I do wonder if the palace are happy with YouTubers discussing things like surrogacy to get it out there, without putting it out there (if that makes sense).
It wouldn't surprise me one jot that the Palace is fine with all of us out here discussing the surrogacy/ies!
Almost exactly the same tactics and dodgy birth stories worked very well for Richard (III) on his older brother Edward IV.
Most notably it's how Richard usurped the Monarchy and became king - when he never should have been.
Two children, the rightful heirs, were murdered in the process.
Regardless of whether stoat children exist or not, it seems to me that the Palace et al could well be very surreptitiously using this same ploy to help protect the Monarchy and the heirs from the stoats.
As we now know, outrageously they actually did suggest that they could become 'Co-Monarchs' with William and Catherine...
The Palace may well have turned the tables on the stoats to
a) help demolish Haz's &ho's popularity
b) reduce their credibility and power in the UK and
c) gain new Royal supporters
We may not have a particular name for ourselves like the Skanky Squad nor an organisation but nonetheless, there are many thousands of us online and we are powerful!
The first time the idea of surrogacy was widely publicised was when the too obviously fake surrogacy admission was posted just after Aldi came on the scene.
It purported to come from Kensington Palace.
The person who posted it is still unknown.