Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

PurplePie

Chatty Member
Someone read the Spanish version on reddit and very kindly summarised it below. It's as everyone expected.

"It seems like Harry resents William from being closer to their parents than he was, while simultaneously rejecting having a co-dependent relationship with Harry into adulthood. So instead, Harry decided to recreate it in his marriage.

Harry is obsessed with "Mummy." He even keeps a lock of her hair in his bedside nightstand. When Meghan thought she might be pregnant, they put the pregnancy tests next to the Diana hair "so Mummy could work her magic." When they came up positive, Harry said, "Thank you, Mummy." (ewww) Harry does blame Diana for two things: getting him drunk for the first time when he was a kid, and having him circumcised as a baby (thus decades later causing him to get frostburn on the tip of his dick).

He's not scorched earth about Charles, but he does sneer at the attempts Charles made to share his interests with Harry growing up. For example, Charles would read Shakespeare to Harry and take him to plays. Harry finds Shakespeare stupid and can't understand it. Charles also loves gardening, the environment, and related things like plant science and landscape architecture, interests he shares with William because Harry finds such things boring. What does interest Harry? Who knows. Booze, video games, drugs, having sex, going on pub crawls with his boys and Princess Diana, I guess. (Again, no wonder Harry is close with Andrew.)

Speaking of curtsy! Harry describes how William is not a hugger with strangers (implying it may be because as kids they were constantly meeting strangers who wanted to hug or shake their hands). While Harry briefed Meghan she would have to curtsy when meeting his gran, he "forgot" to tell her that she should to William as well.

Anyway when they met William and Catherine for the first time, they arrived when William and Catherine were playing on the lawn with their kids (implying it was maybe a surprise visit?) Meghan ran up to William and hugged him and William "recoiled." Harry implies it was because she didn't curtsy but Harry already established William is NOT a hugger. But "Meg hugs everyone, even strangers!" so in Harry's mind, it's justified and they should all just be like her, I guess?

Here are the big reasons why William and Kate were "mean" to Meghan:

- When meeting her for the first time, they were polite and friendly but did not hug her and make her their best friend. Harry is confused by this because, while he'd never seen Suits, William and Catherine did watch it. When he told them he was dating an actress from a show called Suits, they were like, oh yeah, we like that show! Harry seemed to expect Elvis level hysteria when they met that actress from that show they watched.

- At one point, William sat Harry down privately and warned that rushing any partner, especially an American, into the royal family would bring difficulties and laid out those difficulties. William advised Harry to take it slow before proposing marriage. Harry was offended.

- At the two couples' first joint appearance, Meghan realized she'd forgotten her lip gloss ("an American thing," says Harry. Huh?). Meghan asked to borrow Catherine's and Harry was mad that Catherine seemed "hesitant." Keep in mind, she gave Meghan the lip gloss! She just took too long looking in her purse, according to Harry. She gave Meghan the lip gloss and Meghan put some on her finger and then applied some to her lips. (Good manners at least!) No one seemed to have had a problem, but Harry is convinced this "incident" put a whole pall on the event. Maybe he is insane.

- The night before William's wedding, Harry and William, both single guys, had dinner together, went on a walkabout and then had a sleepover. Harry thought that was a "new tradition," but the night before his wedding, William said he could come for dinner and the walkabout but couldn't stay the night. When Harry asked why, William explained he had a postpartum wife, a 14 day old newborn and two little kids who had to be prepared to be attendants in the wedding the next day. Harry was livid and had a tantrum, and says William was "just like Thomas Markle" (Meghan's dad, who was either uninvited, too mean to come, too sick to come to the wedding, pick one).

- When Meghan called up Catherine to talk about the wedding a few days after Catherine had given birth, Meghan branded Catherine "too hormonal" and had "baby brain," making her cry. William called Meghan's comment rude. Harry told Meghan, "You can't say stuff like that when you don't know her [Catherine] that well." (or you know, ever??)

- I already rehashed the incident where William told Harry privately that employees of their joint office were complaining about Meghan's bullying behavior, but Harry didn't want to hear it.

- The Queen invited her kids, grandkids, their spouses, kids etc. to Balmoral Castle every summer as a family reunion (fishing, barbecues, etc.). Meghan and Harry declined the invite three years in a row, including the last summer, when the Queen knew she was dying. The day the Queen died, Charles and Anne were nearby and able to be with her quickly. The other kids/grandkids had to scramble to get to Scotland.

- By prior agreement, it was to be only immediate adult relatives present at the queen's bedside when the time came, meaning no spouses allowed, no underage heirs (so no Prince George). Harry got on the phone and harangued his dad, who was at his mother's deathbed, that it was "disrespectful for Meghan not to be allowed."

- The complaining delayed the others who eventually left without Harry. Harry finally took his own plane and arrived without Meghan. But it was too late and the queen was already dead when he arrived. When Harry was allowed his private moment with his grandmother's body, he told her, "I hope you're happy now."

- The common theme to everything is how it must revolve around Harry, and conflict arises when it doesn't. Harry has unresolved resentment towards Diana because her life didn't revolve around Harry, and she paid more attention to William. When William got married to Catherine, Harry started to have a meltdown, but it was placated somewhat because Catherine nurtured Harry, too. He really only went scorched earth when William became a father and wasn't available to be Harry's best friend/daddy anymore.

- When the longest reigning monarch in British history died, no one was paying attention to Harry. Harry was mad that his wedding, as sixth in line to the throne, was not held at Westminster Abbey. After Harry wore the Nazi uniform, he met a rabbi, so that's proof he's not prejudiced. The only racism Harry has literally ever considered is the racism directed at his wife. World affairs? The war in Afghanistan is justifiable because 1) mowing down Afghans from a helicopter was like a video game, and 2) 9/11. That - and which countries are nice to him and offer the best/funnest luxuries - are all Harry considers about world politics. The press exists only to either be nice to him or make him mad. Women exist to either fuck him, or take care of him like a mother. His mother's death was about him. His grandmother's death was about him. His parents' divorce was about him. To the extent he considers others, like William or Meghan, it's in the context of how they make him feel. William lost his mother? Harry is way sadder! Meghan is depressed? That makes Harry uncomfortable!"
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 107

carolinew

VIP Member
Just occurred to me - weren't this dreadful pair going on about stopping misinformation. So they sat for years letting everyone think the royal family is racist when they didn't really mean it? You couldn't make this tripe up. Does Harry think we're all stupid? And that smirk on his face when he said Meghan didn't say racist was positively evil. Now they've realised they're running out of money and want a way back in to the institution they loathe. King Charles is so weak he'll probably let them back too.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 100

Sunlifeover50

VIP Member
God his hair is so bad.

I have a husband with a bald spot at the back, but it's close cropped and it seems so much better than his somehow.

Perhaps because his hair is like frizzy pubes floating above pink flesh. It's just not nice, is it?
I can’t believe he said Williams hair was receding faster than his. That was 2021 (pp funeral), there’s 2 years between them and Harry ain’t exactly looking like Michael Bolton these days either is he.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 95

carolinew

VIP Member
Striding into that building like a man with a mission - you know, a peacekeeper brokering a deal between Russia and Ukraine or a surgeon about to start a gruelling multi-organ transplant - or ANYTHING worthwhile. But no, it's just Harry talking about nothing of consequence AT ALL.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 91

struggs123

Chatty Member
And then says that staying silent is abuse? There are so many examples of hypocrisy from all this.
So much hypocrisy.

Complains about others leaking personal conversations, he has gone way beyond that and shared very personal moments that are no one else's business. The most prominent imo is him saying how Charles broke the news of his mum to him and William, that must feel like an arrow straight to the heart for them both.

Says silence is betrayal, remains very silent for 2 years whilst the press not only say the royals are racist, but also by extension the British public aka the country he says he loves.

Gets annoyed in recollections of people sticking up for their partners, yet says he was just sticking up for meghan as a justification for some crappy behaviour.

Harps on about royal men marrying who fits the mould rather than their true loves, yet says he begged his dad not to marry his true love.

Says Paul Burrell is vile for using his mums name to make money- pot, kettle, black eh.

Just to name a few...
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Angry
Reactions: 86

buttheyneverblindme8

Well-known member
Harry: "Paul Burrell milking my mother's death for money made my blood boil."

Also Harry: *milks his mother's death for money*

Make it make sense, bestie.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 86

kev1974

VIP Member
The flagship Waterstones on Piccadilly this morning. Press/media outnumbering Sparry fans by about 30:1 😂😂

Just pitfiful

Probably more copies in the window display than they’ll sell all day.

Will monitor to see how long it is until the showcase display is removed for something else, like Mr Men books or something more popular.

2D280363-998D-40EA-BFEE-CB8203ED0E52.jpeg

1D5CD699-333A-41CF-A33C-03EB45A945F3.jpeg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 84

LadyLockdown

VIP Member
Mu husband (not English / selective hearing at best) just heard about the release of the book on the radio.
He thought it was called "Hair" :LOL:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 83

Autisteuse

VIP Member
You know what annoys me most? The canonisation of Saint Diana who, while fragrant, laid waste to at least six marriages with the dedication of a panda-eyed Genghis Khan; meanwhile, there were other people in that car in the Alma tunnel that night. Dodi al Fayed’s memory has been smeared and spat on ever since his death. Without much positive evidence to support the claims, he has been smeared as a playboy, drug addict, shady, ‘Arab’, ne’er do well, useless and spoilt. Yet he was none of these things to his father.
Mohammed al-Fayed still grieves every day for his son. He was mocked and jeered at when he put up statues to Dodi and Diana in Harrods. His extreme grief and pain were written off by the press and public; he was also called ‘too emotional’ (shorthand for ‘not British enough’). While Diana used Dodi to get at Haznat Khan in an attempt to make him jealous, she apparently had no real feelings for him - like so many of her other lovers, he would be discarded when she had got her desired result.
Mohammed al-Fayed will never get over the shock of losing his boy. Harry makes out like he’s the only one who has ever lost someone; has he ever been kind to al-Fayed, or acknowledged the man his mother was wilfully toying with? It’s not all about YOU, Harry. Spare a single thought for the others who have suffered, directly and indirectly, through the fatal crash.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 83

Sooz

Chatty Member
God his hair is so bad.

I have a husband with a bald spot at the back, but it's close cropped and it seems so much better than his somehow.

Perhaps because his hair is like frizzy pubes floating above pink flesh. It's just not nice, is it?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 80

Jaynefnw

Chatty Member
I can’t believe he said Williams hair was receding faster than his. That was 2021 (pp funeral), there’s 2 years between them and Harry ain’t exactly looking like Michael Bolton these days either is he.
The difference is William accepted it and cut his hair .. Harry is gripping on to his last few strands as hard as he is gripping on to his titles
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 77

MrsDimSum

VIP Member
Sky news this morning that only 1 person was in the queu at a big Waterstones in London all the rest of the people milling about were press 😂

queue woman was interviewed and she said she bought the book as it meant her ‘weird’ family felt less weird to her after reading all the Royal Family drama 😂😂😂
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 76

jonathanlynch

VIP Member
God his hair is so bad.

I have a husband with a bald spot at the back, but it's close cropped and it seems so much better than his somehow.

Perhaps because his hair is like frizzy pubes floating above pink flesh. It's just not nice, is it?
There is a scene in the Netflix show where Harry and Archie are watching a Hummingbird during sunset. Harry is in silhouette against the sunset. His head and his thinning hair look like a hairy scrotum.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 75

Kezzle1

Chatty Member
Apparently the text messages are 4 days before the wedding, so Kate took the flowers round the next day which was THREE DAYS BEFORE THE WEDDING! Wasn't the gruesome twosome busy doing something else that day???
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 74

FerreroRocher

Chatty Member
Well done @Libbie - new thread looks great! Fab title too 😆

If I heard correctly on GMB this morning, Trisha said that H had written about how he had condemned on social media the racist abuse experienced by King Harold of Norway's black son-in-law to be, as if to show that he is capable of 1) identifying racist abuse, and 2) addressing it publicly when he disagrees with it. So why was he unable to correct the implication that he and TW started on Oprah that the RF was racist? They were happy to allow the British Press to run with that 'assumption' and are only now rowing back, saying they never said anyone was racist after leaving that cloud hanging over the RF for so long and allowing PP and HMTQ to die under the global accusation of being racist, completely trashing their live's work and reputation. Honestly, they are lower than snake's bellies.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 73

MeInMidAmerica

VIP Member
Harry is so thick he couldn't see that Stephen Colbert was mocking him. Laughing at him for his story about William avoiding him at Eton, talking about the Hogwarts sorting hat having put them both into the same house. Saying that the book is available in commemorative plate. The PR drivel also calls the book a landmark publication full of insight, revelation, self-examination and hard-won wisdom.
What an absolute joke.
I wonder when it will dawn on Harry: he’s just another American celebrity now, no longer functioning as a royal Prince. He doesn’t think there’s a difference, but we Americans know that there is.

A Royal Prince is a unassailable life-long position, where the UK public has a life-long interest and usually great affection for you. There is a ‘family’ aspect between the RF and the nation. Like a family, the ties that bind can be frayed a bit at times, but they are never completely broken. There’s a permanent bond. Your politicans, like ours, come and go. But the RF remains. You take their children to your heart, watch them grow. There’s a sort of intimacy that politicians and celebrities never achieve with the public.

Harry grew up within that system and, at the moment, he may think he has transplanted it to the US. This rush of publicity he takes as confirmation of his success.

But what Meghan knows, having grown up around the Hollywood celebrity system, is that we Americans treat our celebrities like court jesters. You have to keep entertaining us, or we turn our backs on you. ‘In Hollywood, you are only as important as your last movie.’ As a third rate actress, attaining celebrity status was probably enough for her until now. But she knows the Juggler must keep juggling…or we will just turn away. The Eagles said it well in their song New Kid in Town, “They will never forget you till somebody new comes along.”

So observe please Colbert’s attitude. He thinks this ‘prince gig’ is a joke. He will make Harry laugh at the instituation, but Harry is clinging to the titles, so he‘s mocking himself and Meghan. He’s mocking the fake ‘Cali RF‘ personas they are trying to pull off. They want to be taken so seriously. They want to be seen as ‘humanitarians.‘ They are going to bring us world peace. They are going to end systemic racism.

But they are just a Great Gossipy Side Show. Harry is playing the fool to keep our attention. But that runs counter to the World Diplomat personas he and M desparately desire. Can’t you see him droning on at the UN while bored diplomats find their minds wandering towatd thoughts of his frostbit penis or his broken necklace.

They give no respect and get none.

Harry is just an American celebrity now. He and Meghan damn well better keep us entertained. She maybe can squeeze one more book out to appease the audience. But what then? Pathethic soft porn like the once mighty Madonna? Politics? I don’t think the powers that be in her preffered party see much potential in her anymore.

From Prince to Hollywood Court Jester. Enjoy your new status, Harry.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 71

Sea

VIP Member
Letter from Esther Rantzen to the DTel :sick:


SIR – I would like to express gratitude for what Harry and Meghan achieved during their brief career as members of the Royal family.

Their wedding was fun, moving and ground-breaking. The Invictus Games, created by Harry, have proved to be a morale-boosting showcase for disabled veterans to demonstrate courage and resilience.

The presence of a mixed-race duchess exposed racist attitudes in the media, the establishment and the general population that have at last begun to be addressed.

The support for vulnerable groups such as the Grenfell Tower fire victims has resulted in increased awareness and fundraising. And absurd allegations, such as the claim that Harry “harmed” the health of the late Queen Elizabeth (who herself pointed out the impact of the Covid she suffered) before she died aged 96, have exposed the ruthlessness of so-called “sources” – who, as Harry revealed, targeted him and his wife.

Well done, Harry and Meghan, for showing us who we are. Our best hope is that we learn lessons from the sad loss of your talents and potential.

Dame Esther Rantzen
Lyndhurst, Hampshire
She can shut the fxxk up. Dame Childline didn't speak up or investigate important (real) rumours of the vulnerable children and adults abuse from Saville and the beeb.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 70