Puberty blocker trials for 11 year olds. How can we fight this? It looks like we can't.
I've rarely felt so hopeless as I do at this news.
It can surely be fought with the science itself. Just because children are signed up for a trial, surely on one level this doesnt necessarily mean that puberty blockers will be prescribed?
If the NHS has any sense, they will proceed with immense caution. The children will be given proper counselling that provides a balanced perspective about why they feel they need these puberty blockers, In this way the children and their parents will be reassured that their wishes are being taken seriously, as they are.
In the meantime the scientists and NHS and of course the media, will be reviewing the 'treatments' available and check the whole risks and benefits scenario that any drug taken needs.
If the scientists and the media then start discussing the risks around puberty blockers sensibly...the ones Im remembering are: ..things like the enforced sterility, never ever having the chance to have a child naturally, the chemical changes to the body, and things like lower bone density, (im not sure I know them all, but Im sure they are bad!) The potential lack of ever having an orgasm or sexual function on any level ....
balanced against the desire/need/ feeling that they are a different gender or sex. (Which maybe also needs a bit of redefinition, about what exactly is meant by gender or sex? )
The desire for boys to wear a dress or girls to wear trousers, or boys to wear make up and girls to go make up free, the ability to cross dress ( which of course you can choose to in any case do regardless of sex)
And maybe also a conversation about same sex attraction, leaving aside all the ''be kind'' arguments , what are the definitions of lesbianism and homosexuality? Thinking of the numbers of sensible people who comment about issues like why should a lesbian be attracted to a transwoman? as surely this contradicts the definition of lesbian as same sex attracted?
Personally I think this kind of discussion could get complicated extremely quickly, because so much of the detail has to be about personal choice, and cannot be ....defined.......and its also so personal individual sexuality and preferences have nothing to do with me
Theres due to be a documentary soon about Queen James, the king of Scotland and Great Britain in the time of the Tudors, who had ambiguous relationships with both men and women, interesting but difficult to define!