It’s utterly disgusting. I hate everything about surrogacy to start with and it just seems another way to treat women as nothing.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Some of them do and some of them don't, but don't dare ask or assume. Either way you'll be an ignorant bigot!Surely “non-binary people” don’t want to be recognised on Lesbian Visibility Week
Speaking to non binaries who have pronouns they want you to guess, is like staring at the barrel of a gun in a game if Russian Roulette. Chances are you guess wrong and lose your head.Some of them do and some of them don't, but don't dare ask or assume. Either way you'll be an ignorant bigot!
I think it's an appalling prospect.
Not only are you erasing the woman who carried the baby for 9 months (and who may also have provided the egg), treating her like a carrier bag, you are writing her out of the child's life forever - so even if, in 20, 30, 40 years time s/he tries to find the person who gave birth to her,/him there will be no records. Anyone who works with adopted people, or people brought up in care will confirm that the need to know where they have come from is often overwhelming and all-consuming.
And frankly, I think there should be even more diligence about babies born to surrogates, especially if they are being handed over to two (or more) men. This is because the parents - male, female, hetero, gay, bi - have not had the opportunity to develop a relationship with the baby during gestation. I think this will be a greater risk if sperm and egg are donated. No matter how much they want this baby in their family (and we'll assume it's for good reasons), a baby can be very hard work. A baby which has been snatched out of the womb and away from the arms of its mother is HIGHLY likely to be difficult to settle and perhaps feed.
We need to make sure that those babies are protected and the parents are supported if necessary. The baby must always come first. ALWAYS.
I totally agree. Adopted children often want to reconnect with their birth families when they are adults even if they had a happy life with their adoptive parents. They want you know what their relatives look like and see if they have any inherited family traits. I can see that surrogate mothers if they were the egg donor are in the same position. In future some of those kids may want to meet them.
It's totally unfair on the children and their needs should come first.
Whether babies/children or animals, adopt don’t shop! Surrogacy is commercial breeding.
This is them whining about the lack of commercial surrogacy on a law firm website https://www.fsp-law.com/adam-frisby-jamie-corbett-and-international-surrogacy/
‘Even with no biological connection’. Scientific research indicates that the woman carrying the child can influence the baby's gene activity through the uterine environment, shaping the child's development, temperament, and health, regardless of the genetic origin of the egg. So yes, a child may well want to trace their birth mother even if they were conceived using a donor egg.
Epigenetics of pregnancy: looking beyond the DNA code - PMC
archived 27 Apr 2026 12:50:35 UTC
Another day, another children’s library
Wobberley going off on one:
She really hates women doesn't she?
So no one is allowed a platform except TRA’s? Opposing viewpoints are never allowed, she’s completely unhinged.
So basically let’s erase the woman who birthed the child………to hell with all protocols?
Honestly surrogacy should not be the industry it’s turned out to be. More and more like The Handmaid’s Tale everyday.
I loathe this evil woman with a passion. Of course she feels strongly about this -it’s how she makes her money. She is the one that is doing real harm. She has a medical degree but she’s been struck off, so can she even say she’s a doctor?
There were a few interviews with her in the winter, and I remember the interviewers afterwards saying they felt they were in the presence of evil. I can believe it. Someone who deliberately harms children and takes their future away from them is evil indeed.
Julie Bindel.
I was in the presence of evil
Being face-to-face in a room with Helen Webberley, the 'Gender GP', felt similar to the times I have interviewed rapists and murderers in prison. I was in the midst of a malign presence
juliebindel.substack.com
BBC News - Keep Hampstead ponds access as is, body recommends
www.bbc.co.uk
So Hampstead Ponds determined to go down fighting. Despite Sex Matters being granted the judicial review, they don't care.
I don't believe for a minute that 86% of the responses to the recent consultation supported the current position. That reminds me of elections in countries where the incumbent gets 97% of the votes.
They must think we're stupid to believe that is an accurate representation of the votes they received.
The contempt that people have for women is astounding. Phillipson is responsible for the continued flouting of the law by all and sundry.
Keep Hampstead ponds open to trans swimmers, City of London says
Hampstead Heath's chiefs are recommending the ladies' and men's ponds retain the current trans access policy.
www.bbc.co.uk
So Hampstead Ponds determined to go down fighting. Despite Sex Matters being granted the judicial review, they don't care.
I don't believe for a minute that 86% of the responses to the recent consultation supported the current position. That reminds me of elections in countries where the incumbent gets 97% of the votes.
They must think we're stupid to believe that is an accurate representation of the votes they received.
The contempt that people have for women is astounding. Phillipson is responsible for the continued flouting of the law by all and sundry.
Consummate professional, as always.
They'd have a better argument if there wasn't a mixed sex pond, if it was a binary choice male or female then I could see how an argument could be made (still wouldn't be legal post FWS but could make more sense)BBC News - Keep Hampstead ponds access as is, body recommends
Keep Hampstead ponds open to trans swimmers, City of London says
Hampstead Heath's chiefs are recommending the ladies' and men's ponds retain the current trans access policy.
So Hampstead Ponds determined to go down fighting. Despite Sex Matters being granted the judicial review, they don't care.
I don't believe for a minute that 86% of the responses to the recent consultation supported the current position. That reminds me of elections in countries where the incumbent gets 97% of the votes.
They must think we're stupid to believe that is an accurate representation of the votes they received.
The contempt that people have for women is astounding. Phillipson is responsible for the continued flouting of the law by all and sundry.
- Status