This is top bantz. The TRAs are going bonkers and I’m here for it. MAkes a lie of the hysteria that “trans people are banned from women’s sports!!!”. Nope! Ski on, love.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I’m absolutely not being glib here, but BIB really hasn’t aged well.
Or against other women, seemingly!
I've just gone on to the site to check out the comments section. The overwhelming majority agree with us.
What a bleeping disgrace this Phillipson woman is.
Workplaces have to comply with 1992 Workplace regs
Under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 (Regulation 20), UK employers must provide "suitable and sufficient" toilet and washing facilities that are readily accessible, clean, well-lit, and ventilated. Separate facilities for men and women are required, unless each toilet is in a separate, lockable room.
Key Requirements (1992 Regulations):
Separation: Separate rooms or facilities for men and women should be provided.
Hygiene & Maintenance: Toilets must be kept in a clean and orderly condition.
Facilities: Each toilet must have washbasins with soap and clean towels or drying methods nearby.
Sanitary Disposal: Female toilets must include proper sanitary waste disposal bins.
Accessibility: Toilets must be easily accessible to employees.
Minimum Number of Toilets (Approved Code of Practice):
1–5 People: 1 toilet & 1 washbasin.
6–25 People: 2 toilets & 2 washbasins.
26–50 People: 3 toilets & 3 washbasins.
51–75 People: 4 toilets & 4 washbasins.
76–100 People: 5 toilets & 5 washbasins.
Key Requirements (1992 Regulations):
Separation: Separate rooms or facilities for men and women should be provided.
Hygiene & Maintenance: Toilets must be kept in a clean and orderly condition.
Facilities: Each toilet must have washbasins with soap and clean towels or drying methods nearby.
Sanitary Disposal: Female toilets must include proper sanitary waste disposal bins.
Accessibility: Toilets must be easily accessible to employees.
Minimum Number of Toilets (Approved Code of Practice):
1–5 People: 1 toilet & 1 washbasin.
6–25 People: 2 toilets & 2 washbasins.
26–50 People: 3 toilets & 3 washbasins.
51–75 People: 4 toilets & 4 washbasins.
76–100 People: 5 toilets & 5 washbasins.
How many toilets should a workplace have?
HSE's relevant legislation is the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. Regulation 20 covers Sanitary conveniences
The Equalities Minister hasn't "admitted" anything! This statement has not been forced reluctantly from her lips!
What she has done is tied herself in knots desperately flailing for some way, however convoluted and ridiculous, to pander to the Trans Cult. This is why it has taken so long for her to comment.
She hasn't wanted to follow the SC ruling but was stuck in limbo until she has had this flash of - can I call it "inspiration"? - and suddenly thought "That's it - I can flatten my cockroach-like carapace and crawl through this minuscule gap between the law and insanity, and hope that I get my a out of the way before somebody stamps on me!"
"Admits" makes it sound as though she had tried to hide something and it's been forced out of her against her will.
In truth she has prevaricated and postponed until she thinks she has found a way to slither out of her responsibilities.
I rarely use this word - and until I tattled on here, I didn't, ever - but she is a kh^nt. And a cowardly, self-serving one at that.
And she's wrong. Workplaces have a duty of care and that includes women's privacy, dignity and safety.
EDIT - Grammar
Last edited:
No, she's competing in the correct category, but it's remarkable that she's not tried to compete against the men. And surely she's misgendering herself by competing in the women's category?
She's lying and trying to muddy the waters even further just as the SC ruling had given them a chance to settle. She doesn't want to protect women and girls. She does want to pander to perverted and often very violent men.
Is there a section on changing rooms? I can't see a search function.Workplaces have to comply with 1992 Workplace regs
Under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 (Regulation 20), UK employers must provide "suitable and sufficient" toilet and washing facilities that are readily accessible, clean, well-lit, and ventilated. Separate facilities for men and women are required, unless each toilet is in a separate, lockable room.
Key Requirements (1992 Regulations):
Separation: Separate rooms or facilities for men and women should be provided.
Hygiene & Maintenance: Toilets must be kept in a clean and orderly condition.
Facilities: Each toilet must have washbasins with soap and clean towels or drying methods nearby.
Sanitary Disposal: Female toilets must include proper sanitary waste disposal bins.
Accessibility: Toilets must be easily accessible to employees.
Minimum Number of Toilets (Approved Code of Practice):
1–5 People: 1 toilet & 1 washbasin.
6–25 People: 2 toilets & 2 washbasins.
26–50 People: 3 toilets & 3 washbasins.
51–75 People: 4 toilets & 4 washbasins.
76–100 People: 5 toilets & 5 washbasins.
How many toilets should a workplace have?
HSE's relevant legislation is the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. Regulation 20 covers Sanitary convenienceswww.hse.gov.uk
It doesn’t make sense does it? Of course, she is competing in the correct category, but I thought misgendering was the most heinous of crimes, yet she’s doing it to herself as she knows she doesn’t stand a chance against the men. So, they can twist and turn the narrative so they can try and get the best of both worlds. But only when it suits them.
Why can we have coconut milk then?
Why don't you just educate yourself, you bigot!
It's not up to us to do your nut milk research for you!
Yeah gay people were the first to be thrown under the trans bus tbh but I do get slightly ticked off that it was lesbians who had to stand up first against it and took all the abuse, a lot of prominent gay men (with some notable and admirable exceptions) kept quiet or even swallowed the Trans Dogma at first, indeed some of them like Little OJ still doI think a lot of that is true, for sure. People whose daily lives involve more physical realities are definintely more prone to get it.
My husband, though, and a large chunk of male friends who also get it, get it through other means. One is gay and the prospect of his dating pool including confused girls appals him. The others, though they are desk jockeys in knowledge jobs, get it because they are the sort of men who actually like women, value us, see as as fully human. My husband and best straight male friend are like this - iis a large part of why I love them. Husband is rugby playing working class son of immigrants done good in life, but he has always hated locker room talk and display masculinity. so for him it was really easy to listen to what women say when we talk about problematic male behaviour, and to him, those males thinking they’re women doesn’t change that he sees them as exactly the boundary violaters he’s happy to call out elsewhere. He’s the guy who stands up to mates on stag dos and refuses to go to the strip club. He’s been kicked out of lads group chats for calling out misogyny. So I think that’s also a good basis for getting it.
So there are many ways to skin this cat.
Sorry, I am rambly this morning I accidentally had a smoothie with caffeine and I think that in combination with usual coffee, I’m around 4 double espressos in
I’ve just used PayPal, and I was asked if I wanted to donate £1 to some LGBT charity, to “Help save LGBT” lives.
. Are les, gay and bi people’s lives at any particular risk? Most LGB people I know of are just regular people getting on with life, just like everyone else. So, I’m guessing it’s for those poor, marginalised roosters in frocks and co. I know it’s only £1 but I honestly wouldn’t give that weird lot a penny.
. Are les, gay and bi people’s lives at any particular risk? Most LGB people I know of are just regular people getting on with life, just like everyone else. So, I’m guessing it’s for those poor, marginalised roosters in frocks and co. I know it’s only £1 but I honestly wouldn’t give that weird lot a penny.Maybe coconuts identify as cows but oats don‘t. Or something
I think it's here
The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
a lot of prominent gay men (with some notable and admirable exceptions) kept quiet or even swallowed the Trans Dogma
Particularly self-immolating when you think how long it took them to shake off the automatic GAY = PDFILE in many people's minds.
I can remember I used to feel that I was beating my head off a wall trying to convince some people that gay men were attracted to other MEN - not little boys, and that someone wanting sex with children of either sex is a PDFile, and that is a different thing entirely.
And now, after all of these years just being normal people who chose sexual partners of their own sex, they have become inextricably linked and tainted once again with perversion because of the behaviour of these fetishists..
Well - Coconuts are sort of hairy . . .
Thing that annoys me about 'birthing/pregnant people' is that people play dumb and say 'unfortunately girls get pregnant too so the language covers them'. duck off, you know full well it's to pander to trans people. Why not just say pregnant women and girls. And also actual women are telling you they find the term offensive but the opinions of actual pregnant women and how they like to be referred to don't matter now.
- Status