JM wasn't dangerous, unless someone burned down their house from her baked bean tin candles or died of botulism from one of her recipes.Pretty much, yeah. If anything it's actually worse.
JT, however, is a menace.
JM wasn't dangerous, unless someone burned down their house from her baked bean tin candles or died of botulism from one of her recipes.Pretty much, yeah. If anything it's actually worse.
I've not read The Salt Path, but I've seen it on the news. Didn't the author claim her partner had been cured of an incurable neurological disease by hiking, or have I misunderstood?It's so much worse than the salt path as that (and Dr Jess Taylors) is a made up memoir sold as a true story.
This is being sold as something to help people when all it will do is make them despair. Her posts on social media are targeting people that need professional help, not to be told their delusions are all valid and there is no help for them.
Open letters are a waste of time usually, but this is a case for a credible body to make a stance.
As someone said she's stolen a whole career based on lies and she's now an imminent risk.
It's a protected title and misuse should be reported to the Fitness to Practice team at the Health and Care Professions Council. The contact details are on the HCPC website. I expect she might rush to correct it this time, as she reads here, but this isn't the first time this has happened and she's let it slide.View attachment 4026296
Ummm, is she a forensic psychologist though? Is she even any of those things?
As flawlessly beautiful as she is qualified.I clicked on that video just to see what they introducer her as, and yes it's using a protected title that she's not registered to use.
View attachment 4026341
To practice as a forensic psychologist in the UK, you must be registered with the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). It is a legal requirement, and using the protected title "forensic psychologist" without HCPC registration is an offense.
You haven’t misunderstood. I read the first book and was charmed but also slightly disbelieving. It didn’t read like a memoir. So I wasn’t hugely surprised when the whole thing turned out to be a pile of cack.I've not read The Salt Path, but I've seen it on the news. Didn't the author claim her partner had been cured of an incurable neurological disease by hiking, or have I misunderstood?
It's a protected title and misuse should be reported to the Fitness to Practice team at the Health and Care Professions Council. The contact details are on the HCPC website. I expect she might rush to correct it this time, as she reads here, but this isn't the first time this has happened and she's let it slide.
Yes you're right, I oversimplified it. I think the difference is the salt path was sold as an uplifting Story rather than as cure to a very unusual condition.I've not read The Salt Path, but I've seen it on the news. Didn't the author claim her partner had been cured of an incurable neurological disease by hiking, or have I misunderstood?
It's a protected title and misuse should be reported to the Fitness to Practice team at the Health and Care Professions Council. The contact details are on the HCPC website. I expect she might rush to correct it this time, as she reads here, but this isn't the first time this has happened and she's let it slide.
The Salt Path was a rousing true story of a middle aged middle class couple Ray and Moth, who lost their home and found out he had an incurable, terminal condition. They decided to walk around the costal path of South West England, and despite their challenges it appeared to do Moth so much good, and he has lived longer than anyone with the disease.I've not read The Salt Path, but I've seen it on the news. Didn't the author claim her partner had been cured of an incurable neurological disease by hiking, or have I misunderstood?
It's a protected title and misuse should be reported to the Fitness to Practice team at the Health and Care Professions Council. The contact details are on the HCPC website. I expect she might rush to correct it this time, as she reads here, but this isn't the first time this has happened and she's let it slide.
I’m glad someone else has gone there. She’s looking rough AF. First thing I noticed was the eye bags. She needs sleep and water and to reduce the stress levels in her life. I wonder what she’s so stressed about?This isn't an attack on her looks, but she looks so different without all her usual filters.
(But obviously still a stunningly beautiful #lesbian before she has a conniption).
View attachment 4026764
I couldn't care less what anyone looks like. A face is an accident of birth and she's a perfectly normal, average looking woman. It's her insistence that she's so very young and irresistibly beautiful that makes people point our she is in fact middle aged and not especially pretty.This isn't an attack on her looks, but she looks so different without all her usual filters.
(But obviously still a stunningly beautiful #lesbian before she has a conniption).
View attachment 4026764
And it's her over use of very blurring filters that made me post that photo.I couldn't care less what anyone looks like. A face is an accident of birth and she's a perfectly normal, average looking woman. It's her insistence that she's so very young and irresistibly beautiful that makes people point our she is in fact middle aged and not especially pretty.
There was also her advice re opening of tins in some highly dangerous way, with a sharp knife, I think? And advice re putting mugs of boiling water in an airfryer. But I digress.JM wasn't dangerous, unless someone burned down their house from her baked bean tin candles or died of botulism from one of her recipes.
JT, however, is a menace.
This one story shows she can't even find one single extremely rare example of what she claims happens all the time with "people she's worked with" (spoiler: she doesn't work with anyone). So makes it up and gets away with it.Sigh.
So, having watched this young lady's TikTok:
The guy wasn't in her roofspace because he was stalking her, he was squatting there because he was homeless (and possibly also casing the place with an eye to robbing her when she went out).
The police took her report seriously from the word go, attended immediately and investigated properly.
She openly states she was already suffering from bad mental health issues at the time and was known to local services.
She also infers that her friends immediately jumped to her suffering from delusions because she had suffered similar episodes in the past or just due to their general concerns about her mental health.
The neighbour knew he was in the wrong allowing this guy onto the property, so denied knowing anything about it.
This is really not a good example of Jess's claim that stalking victims are being pathologised at every turn.