David Walliams #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I’m still convinced he’ll run away overseas somewhere. He’s sold his house apparently so can effectively disappear. He’s too cowardly to face up to his crimes and he won’t put his son’s welfare before his own. He’ll run soon, before he can be arrested and charged.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 16
Ugh, I honestly thought it was further back than that, I remembered reading about it on here and it feels like quite some time ago. He’s just brazen. The fact he would have total disregard for the innocence of children, enjoy making the parents (mostly mums) uncomfortable, know that they couldn’t challenge him else risk a very inappropriate chat with their child… Is it perversion? Narcissism? Contempt?
It wouldn't surprise me if, in his head, the 'SD' initials stood for Super fool, and so it was an inside joke for himself, as a way of laughing at and showing contempt for the public, and getting a perverted kick out of it too.
 
  • Sick
  • Like
Reactions: 12
He was 30 and in a relationship with a 16 yr old Pixie Geldof “ empty vessel’s make the most noise “🤢😏
They've both denied ever being anything other than friends. It's weird enough to be friends with a 16 year old as an adult but let's try not to spread misinformation.

(Referring to Noel Fielding).
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 11
I’ve heard women say things like this (that they miss it etc) I’m sure these are the kind of people who just don’t know how to get validation in any other way than from other people, being catcalled or having you bum pinched or whatever is a compliment no matter who’s giving it.
I had an awful experience with a man and a much older woman said she could see why it happened to me because of how I looked in comparison to another woman who was going through something similar and the same older woman said that the other woman must have been lying because she wasn’t attractive enough (to be sexually assaulted)
BIB - This sort of comment sickens me.

grape etc isn't about sex. Many of these men are rich enough and powerful enough to get sex anytime they wanted and off very beautiful young women. Others are in relationships where they have an active sex life.

This abuse is about power, control, misogyny and the thrill they get from forcing themselves on someone who doesn't want anything to do with them, who is frightened of them, or has even trusted them, and is too young or powerless, or vulnerable, or "plain" to be taken seriously if they try to complain.

I had an argument with someone on Tuesday who was saying the girls brought it on themselves by going with these men in the first place. NO! They were young, trusting, star-struck, possibly foolish - but if they said "No" then it doesn't matter that they've had a drink, gone to a party, accepted a hug - they have NOT agreed to sex. And a bloke might be disappointed, annoyed, even frustrated, but it doesn't give him the right to grape or abuse a woman or girl.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Angry
Reactions: 17
I'm sure his lawyer said that he had been sectioned under the mental health act and was in a facility. Wasn't that a reason that they didn't approve the injunction because he was under the care of a hospital?
No. The injunction was rejected because the judge wasn't prepared to open a door to every Russell, Huw and David to pull the "mental health" card out of the deck.

What Judge Nicklin did say was that if there was a risk, it was the responsibility of the facility he was in to ensure that he was safe and didn't harm himself. Had he not been in some sort of clinic (or whatever), the judge possibly would have made an order, or suggested that Walliams was assessed and if necessary sectioned (This last bit is my conjecture - I'm not sure what power a judge has regarding anything like this.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I would imagine he has gone through the NHS to be legally sectioned but then ‘bought’ a private bed and treatment thereafter, this is something lots of celebrities do for all kinds of things- use the NHS as it’s often the most acute way to act in an emergency and then when stable, sort out private care to follow. Either way I hope they’re watching him incredibly closely and he’s been deemed fit for questioning. I don’t believe he’ll have offed himself but I imagine he will be trying every trick in the book to be deemed too unstable to assist with any criminal investigation.

Just to add, ‘serious sexual offences’ will mean grape or penetration with an object. It was very obvious from the documentary (which was bad enough) that no one believed he’d remained within those ‘technically legal’ parameters of grooming young women and there were very likely more heinous crimes bubbling below the surface.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 14
It's up on YouTube great watching so far.

Brilliant comment about weaponising of mental health to generate sympathy.

View attachment 4179973
She'd put out some video earlier going on about people in the entertainment business and around Brand 'knowing' something and not saying anything and it being a cover up - as though she was imparting some startling insights when it's completely obvious to the dogs in the street that was happening.
And as usual the idiots in comments going 'yes Nads. Always saying it how it is' 🤦‍♀️
I presume now Loose Women have sacked her she's affecting the persona of disenchanted industry insider who speaks the 'truth'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Very disappointed that my city has made this decision....let's hope that demand plummets!

"A City Council spokesperson said: "Like all libraries, we follow established professional principles around our stock, which is clear that books should be made available to readers unless the content is illegal."
“As with all stock, individual titles may subsequently be withdrawn through our normal stock management processes because of condition, currency or declining demand.”
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sick
Reactions: 6
My son’s primary school has taken all of Walliams books off the shelves and they are in the skip at the back if anyone wants them. Charity shops round here don’t want them.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
My son’s primary school has taken all of Walliams books off the shelves and they are in the skip at the back if anyone wants them. Charity shops round here don’t want them.
This is the only silver lining, I hated those books with a vengeance. The whole catalogue should be pulped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
My son’s primary school has taken all of Walliams books off the shelves and they are in the skip at the back if anyone wants them. Charity shops round here don’t want them.
My daughter had a Walliams school library book in her bag for the last few weeks and her school haven’t made any comment about getting rid of his books… so this one is now in my recycling bin and I’ll be buying an appropriate book to replace it on the school library shelf!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I remember when I was about 14 (I'm in my 40s now) I was walking to school past some men who were working on the roof on the post office two of them whistled at me and the other one said "alright love, fancy a cuppa with us?" and they all started laughing together like hyenas. It's not the worst thing that happened to me (I was sexually abused at 15, by a family friend, like many other woman have said about on here and the Brand thread with their own experiences) but the fact those builders did that when I was in my school uniform, clearly under the age of 16 is vile. And it was just so common place back then. People didn't even raise an eyebrow at that sort of behaviour, did they?
I had very similar in my school uniform just off the bus when a workman said something extremely crude to me. Despite looking angelic I was a cocky little tit and cussed him out so badly in front of his colleagues that they all started laughing at him.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 7
Given how vulnerable David apparently was to self-injury, one would hope he is in a facility while this is all coming out. Not that I believe his intention was to die during his attempts.
I thought he was. I thought that was why the judge was happy to refuse the injunction. As he was under the appropriate care to prevent him doing so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Local charity shop has lots and lots of the Walliams books, but this week they've also got a shed load of Baddiel books.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sick
Reactions: 7
Local charity shop has lots and lots of the Walliams books, but this week they've also got a shed load of Baddiel books.
Richard Osman books are piling up in my local chazza but I don’t think that’s relevant. Or is it? 🤔
Nah, his books are just tit and no one wants to re-read them.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16