David Walliams #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
So what happens now? Does he go into exile like Phillip Schofield and Scott Mills or is a trial brought against him?
There needs to be a police report or investigation, I’m not sure either of these are happening.
With the huge media focus on the Brand case I’d hope some people may feel they can now come forward knowing their identity will be protected.

I expect he will move somewhere outside the UK and try and stay out of the limelight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Child stars are closely chaperoned. But there are no rules to protect young employees or interns or audience members. As someone said (and I can’t recall who) on one of these threads, top of the pops used to send free tickets to their all girls school. They didn’t send them to the her brother’s all boys school.
That was me. Seems amazing now, or does it, djs weren't exactly shy about liking schoolgirls. My mum's family were involved in the film industry going back to the 1940s, on the production side, nobody but nobody in the family would allow any child within a million miles of it. I did a couple of years in hollyweird, again production side, I've never forgotten being at private dinner parties with agents and producers, the way they talked about stars and celebrities was like you'd speak about the village idiot, or your prize Chihuahua that you'd hope would get a prize for best in show. Someone brought up someone like Angelina Jolie, can't exactly remember, but the eye rolling and derision at her attempts to be a humanitarian. Grim af.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Wow
Reactions: 9
My husband is a Twitter user,I'm not. Every morning Matt Lucas would post a good morning with a funny gif or something. Nothing for about 3 weeks now and he's restricted comments 🤔
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 10
There needs to be a police report or investigation, I’m not sure either of these are happening.
With the huge media focus on the Brand case I’d hope some people may feel they can now come forward knowing their identity will be protected.

I expect he will move somewhere outside the UK and try and stay out of the limelight.
It was mentioned somewhere yesterday that Walliams was being investigated by police over the incident with the 15 year old girl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
If I were one of the eleventy billion names in the frame for wrongun of the day, I'd be making a statement saying that, a) I didn't have an injunction against anyone, and b) I'd never made a person I'd had a personal relationship with sign an NDA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19
Tbf I watched the full 20 minute interview and it's clear Lucy's main reason for doing the interview is to highlight how ultimately unregulated the TV industry is for inappropriate behaviour like this, when it's not a police matter. As she said a couple of times: "There is no HR in TV".

And I think that's a very valid point. You're relying on individual production companies, studios, or promoters/agencies but it usually isn't the same as a traditional company. Most of the time as a runner or intern, you're dealing with production companies ran by higher-ups who have known and worked together for years - while you're the unimportant new kid who's got very little job security.

I did study and work in media for a spell before switching careers, mainly because it is SO hard to get on the career ladder (without industry connections, money and/or incredible looks) and the management at the production company job I did get made me miserable.
The intern was getting weekly mentorship meetings over coffee with our production boss, who kept giving them more responsibilities, their own projects, etc - meanwhile I'd get one monthly 'catch up' call scheduled which our head of production (effectively my line manager) cancelled 3+ months in a row because other people or projects took priority. Guess which one of us got their contract extended? 😒

It is so demoralising to be in a situation where you literally can't complain about even any minor grievances or unfair treatment like that, because who are you going to tell if the higher ups are part of the problem?

Nobody wants to kill their golden goose, and runners/production assistants/interns are a dime a dozen.
"There is no HR in TV".seriously? Is this true? I’m genuinely shocked , no wonder there’s so many predators attracted
I was seeing somebody who worked for a decent sized production company a couple years ago and the stories they told me were incredible.

“Talent” just indulged. Keeping them happy the only thing that matters. Profits over people. And because it’s a “glamorous” industry that people want to work in they accept more than they would in a different workplace. Plus the “that’s just the way it is” acceptance of it normalises it.

Crazy.
Pretty much every workplace I’ve ever been in is the same story, even in non showbiz. What a society we are
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Yeah it’s the Little Britain Tour , why were children even allowed in when that type of content is clearly for over 18’s ?
The show is rated a 15 in the UK. I'd guess the tour had a similar guideline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
The show is rated a 15 in the UK. I'd guess the tour had a similar guideline.
I’d hope guideline’s have changed since then? I wouldn’t class the Dreamboys as being suitable for children , that’s the type of content they’d be putting on stage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Age of consent should absolutely be raised to 18. Your a child at 16, still in school. Some for almost another year. Ive been sexually assaulted myself several times over my life. Ive brushed somethings off (the touching of the breasts) i was so upset at the time. Now I am raging. But I know I will never do anything abiut it because I wouldn't want to stir anything up.

We shouldnt have to feel this way.
I agree with you. Many people oppose it, saying things like I lost my virginity at 14 and it didn’t do me any harm, you can’t stop teenagers from having sex, in fact you should allow your kids to have sex under your roof because they’ll do it anyway, and so on.

I disagree. 16 is so incredibly young, and I don’t believe any 16 year old is mature enough for a sexual relationship. You can’t drink, vote, drive a car or get a tattoo at 16, so why can you legally have sex? It’s an ancient law that needs updating
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
No idea whether this has been posted, but I feel it's more appropriate to place it here than in the gossip thread. These are from Enty, alleged to be Jonathan Ross (and Matt Lucas in the first one) and yes, I know their veracity is debated. Sorry if I'm not allowed to post them, or they've already been posted:

The foreign born talk show host and the foreign born A list comic/actor/host both knew what and who their best friend was doing for decades. Did they do or say anything? No. Did he bring the girls around them? Yes.

In an earlier blind today I mentioned this foreign born host who knew what was going on and what his best friend was doing. Just in the short time since the blind was written, I am now getting word that the host is very likely to be the next one who goes down. He wasn't just watching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
I don’t want it to sound like I’m crusading for the BBC but the “BBC is full of n*nces” stuff in this context is incredibly frustrating to me in how it inadvertently negates how widespread an industry problem the protection of predatory men is by shoving the responsibility onto one organisation. BGT was Walliams’s biggest gig for years and that was ITV, same with Harper Collins publishing his books for so long. Focusing on the BBC (imo) loses sight that predators exist in every large company in every industry but particularly across the entertainment industry where there’s little safeguards due to the nature of moving job to job. It’s a culture perpetuated across companies and I think making it all about the BBC in this instance is dismissive of how that culture is able to survive
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 17
I think 16 is very young to have sex, but that has nothing to do with driving cars, drinking or voting, and those things have nothing to do with one another. I think it is young because a 16 year old is immature, and sexual relationships have huge potential for being exploitative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
16 is young. I don't think there's anything wrong with two 16 year olds having sex though. But adults should stay well away from them. There's no need for anyone out of their teens to be going after someone of 16. IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
one of the blokes from Kneecap,
If true, this is beyond disappointing. So far, I haven't read anything concrete but there's a lot of rumours (I went down a Reddit rabbit hole). I tend to think there's no smoke without fire when it comes to allegations like these but I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens. :(