Oh don’t worry, I saw it too. They said if it was live it wouldn’t be offered to childrenThe post you quoted was edited, at first, they spoke about the kid's flu vaccine and said it's not live and does not shed.
I rolled my eyes and just left it because surely one so highly trained would know this really simple thing.
I was going to post that I was not even talking about that vaccine but other live ones and why my GP and the hospital told us to keep clear. I wish I had because then you would have seen that lie quoted in all its glory.
No I didn't - I said if it was live it wouldn't be offered to immunosuppressed or pregnant people. Kids can have live vaccines.Oh don’t worry, I saw it too. They said if it was live it wouldn’t be offered to children
I thought they were supposed to be ignoring you.@Emmelina Ball - I never said it wasn't - but if this is how you get your kicks on a sunday who am I to judge eh.
I didn't know which vaccine was being spoken about (adult versus child 'flu vaccine), and all I said was that as long as a vaccine isn't live attentuated, there is no risk to anyone else. I even corrected my post to avoid this level of confusion, but glad I could provide you with this oppoutunity
I didn't realise it was the kids vaccine being spoken about, and edited my post as soon I twigged. Yup - I made a mistake and corrected it! I have no qualms in admitting when I get things wrong.
This is how things progress guys
Very good point - I think it was seen as too good an oppoutunity to missI thought they were supposed to be ignoring you.
my apologies for misquoting you on your misinformation and misleading claims. Here is what you said:No I didn't - I said if it was live it wouldn't be offered to immunosuppressed or pregnant people. Kids can have live vaccines.
Both my original post (quoted by monga) and my edited are on the previous page, so no-one can debate what was or wasn't said. Believe they're even timestamped too.
My confusion was that I thought it was the adult flu vaccine being talked about - as I said, I made a mistake.
Where's all this correcting and admittance of mistakes from others on the thread.....?
@grampositive already said they didn’t know which vaccine was being spoken about. They are right in saying the flu vaccine is not live and obvious they are referring to the adult one (and not the child one) as they mention pregnant women and immunosuppressed.dhjshehe
my apologies for misquoting you on your misinformation and misleading claims. Here is what you said:
View attachment 1588399
factually inaccurate as flu vaccines are live for children so when you made your blanket statement you were wrong. Thanks for apologising! 🫢
It’s pretty obvious what your comment refers to and that your statement was not about the children’s vaccine.Thanks @Prefrontalmedialcortex !!
Seems to have become a convenient smokescreen for the dozens of actual errors that no one seems to want to address (and I don't repeatedly bring up because it's a bit of a derailment)
McCullough is clearly lying, but as he backs up certain views, anti vaccine people generally won't apply much scrutiny to what he posts.So while I have all this attention on me
McCullough is claiming no RCTs exist that demonstrate the coronavirus vaccines reduce deaths or severe disease - in a tweet posted by a user who has ordered me not to @ them.
I listed four RCTs that definitely exist (and there are many more) - no one sees an issue with McCullough balatantly lying? And yet everyone is happy to blindly follow him?
Any takers?
There are research groups worldwide examining prevalence of vaccine side effects, mechanism, prognosis, risk groups etc. Happy to link them if you're interested.Dr John has been censored and warned by YT he can’t question the covid vaccine side effects…Informed choice anyone…
Don’t you worry John has already posted (on YT recommendation )the only links we’re to checkThere are research groups worldwide examining prevalence of vaccine side effects, mechanism, prognosis, risk groups etc. Happy to link them if you're interested.
This isn't the same thing as a retired nurse speculating and making fake claims. If youtube don't want to host this content that's their prerogative - Campbell can still promote this kind of content elsewhere.
It does always make me chuckle how I hear so much from those who claim to be censored. Bit of an oxymoron.
I think it's only if you fill in the bit that asks if your in contact with immunosuppressed peopleIt's a live vaccine here aswell. I don't think I've had any leaflets about keeping them away from certain people only a few lines of possible side effects on the child themselves , Our flu vacc programme hasn't started yet so I'll look out next time to see .
I’ve never noticed that bit on the form .I’m certainly going to check when they send them out again.I think it's only if you fill in the bit that asks if your in contact with immunosuppressed people
You would think the media would be linking them as reputable sources as that’s who most people follow for information.Not sure how that's a reply to my post @monga - but none of those bodies are research groups.
I understand the suspicion towards WHO/GAVI/CDC/NHS etc etc etc.
Linking who....?You would think the media would be linking them as reputable sources as that’s who most people follow for information.
We know they do , the whitewash continues when they threaten people unless they post from certain sites that they deem appropriateLinking who....?
The media generally provide quotes from the bodies you've listed.
They also often highlight published research or quotes from experts from the research groups I mentioned.
They do both of these with varying degrees of (in)accuracy and contradiction.
They'll also allow people with no expertise or credibility whatsoever to write articles or be interviewed
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?