Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Mark81

VIP Member
I used to really like and respect her as a journalist. I'm not an avid loose women watcher but a few times I've watched now and she has a habit of bringing stories back to her and race. Now race is obviously an important issue, but its not the only one. I wish I could remember the exact stories but some haven't been anything related to race and she has brought it back to being about race and not discussed the actual important issue they're meant to be talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11

Pushyplumb

VIP Member
I used to really like and respect her as a journalist. I'm not an avid loose women watcher but a few times I've watched now and she has a habit of bringing
She is fine when she is just reading the autocue on the news. Anything where she has to give her own opinions she is bloody annoying. Loves the sound of her own voice. She is very dull but with a huge ego and feeling of self-importance. She thinks she is fun and edgy but she reminds me a bit of that 'I do cuss a little' meme. Private school girl trying to act like she is from the streets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11

armywife119

VIP Member
I nearly said yesterday I bet she brings racism into the Ukraine situation. But don’t actually think she would. Yes I understand it’s an issue but it’s just one of many in this hideous war. Why did she have to make it all about that. I hope JSP continues to pull her up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11

armywife119

VIP Member
I liked Charlene when she first started LW but not keen anymore for many reasons some of which have already been talked about above.

I am glad Janet pulled her up here:

Ha ha I missed that be. So glad she pulled her up for it then Charlene struggling to defend her point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11

MrsPiggleWiggle

VIP Member
What I don't understand is how she has to be "impartial" with Matt Hancock, but she'll defend Meghan Markle all day long.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10

bitterntwisted

VIP Member
So I saw a tweet from someone called Nze, saying they were welcomed by Poles with food, blankets, travel for free. Ukrainians offered food while they travelled to the border. "Only their law enforcement officials were terrible." But hey, don't let good news thwart your own agenda. There are good and shitty people everywhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10

Blockster

Chatty Member
If charlene keeps gets voted to do all the trials she will definitely call the British public racist. I say remember that Appleton girl from All Saints, she was white but everyone could see how annoying she was and she had to do a trial everyday if I remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9

Tinkerbe11a

Well-known member
I apologise for dragging this thread back from 2023, but this woman irritates me so much that I need somewhere to vent.

Firstly, I had no idea who she was until she appeared on I'm a Celebrity. My immediate impression was that she came across as incredibly rude and argumentative. Now, before anyone jumps on me, I completely agree that Matt Hancock was hardly a sympathetic character, but there were times when she seemed more interested in shutting people down than having a discussion.

What frustrates me most is that whenever someone disagrees with her, she immediately becomes louder and more forceful. It often feels less like a debate and more like, "I'm right, you're wrong, end of discussion." I find it exhausting to watch.

Which brings me to Loose Women. If she's on, I usually switch off. I genuinely find her difficult to listen to because she rarely seems interested in hearing an alternative point of view.

What really baffles me, though, is how she ended up hosting The Talking Royals podcast. Her views on the Royal Family seem fairly obvious to me. She often comes across as sceptical or critical of them, whereas her attitude towards Harry and Meghan feels noticeably warmer. That's entirely her right, of course, but it does make me question whether she's the best fit for a royal discussion programme.

And don't even get me started on the way she reacts whenever Harry and Meghan's children are mentioned. Half the time she seems determined to shut the conversation down before anyone has even finished their sentence. It's as though she's personally responsible for protecting them from public discussion.

It takes quite a lot for a television personality to irritate me, but for some reason she manages it every single time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9

MrsPiggleWiggle

VIP Member
Surely the thing to focus on at the minute is a nuclear armed, trigger happy dictator who is plunging the world into war and committing actual genocide. Thousands have died, including children. And thousands more will die in the future.

But the thing she's bothered about is a few, unverifed instances of racism.

She used to have straight hair and a bob. She only started rocking the afro once it became fashionable to be black.

She used to have straight hair and a bob. She only started rocking the afro once it became fashionable to be black.

I think so, her children are mixed race. Unless they had an IVF sperm donor.
Poor bloke must get a lecture every night.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 7

shellie

VIP Member
Well this one who won’t wear a Poppy now throws her support around Phil and trolley dolly Holly.
She's represented by YMU as is Phillip so it's not a huge surprise. I'm guessing a few more of them will be told to show their support, the more that is hinted at about him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7

amber.gl19

VIP Member
Originally posted on the LW thread but thought I’d copy here..

Oh what a shock 😮 Charlene loves Nella and she can do no wrong 😡
Well done Denise for being the only panellist brave enough to disagree. Wish they had discussed it more. 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7