Binky Felstead

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
And now looking for 'recommendations ' for a baby moon ie a freebie weekend away .....
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 17
Begging again…
It’s actually pathetic.
bleeping hell. You could go to the thousands and thousands of places not affected by Zika - but no, it has to be a remote island resort thousands of miles away, oh, and gifted so they don’t pay a penny. It makes me enraged!!
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 34
A ‘babymoon’.
You already have 2 children - on whom are you going to dump them when you escape on another freebie??
Babymoon . . . for f***s sake. Read the room sweetheart.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
£3,620.00 for a bag and grifting for a ‘babymoon’
I literally have no more words.
She must have been gifted that because there is no way. It's the ugliest bag of 2022 and I wouldn't wear it even if YSL paid me to :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
i think this too.She wants max to be her dad and for everyone to think that. I think she's quite unfair to JP
Maybe unfair to the child, but I see where Binky’s coming from.
When she was in a relationship with him, he was unbelievably controlling. He told her she was ‘grovelling’. He told her to change her behaviour and attitude in every way. He wanted to control her socialising, her interactions with friends, how much she drank, when she went out &c - while at the same time saying he would ‘do whatever I want on my time’. In short, he’s a misogynistic control freak. While I of course admit that Binky has turned from a sweet and likeable woman into a sleb ‘grammer, she probably doesn’t want the same fate for her daughter. I certainly wouldn’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Maybe unfair to the child, but I see where Binky’s coming from.
When she was in a relationship with him, he was unbelievably controlling. He told her she was ‘grovelling’. He told her to change her behaviour and attitude in every way. He wanted to control her socialising, her interactions with friends, how much she drank, when she went out &c - while at the same time saying he would ‘do whatever I want on my time’. In short, he’s a misogynistic control freak. While I of course admit that Binky has turned from a sweet and likeable woman into a sleb ‘grammer, she probably doesn’t want the same fate for her daughter. I certainly wouldn’t.
Not sure I’d take what you saw on MIC as gospel for what their relationship was actually like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I disagree. 1. It’s a TV show that’s clearly edited for drama. All the podcasts coming out with the ex cast members confirm a lot of it is contrived.
2. From his social media he seems to really love his daughter.
He is India’s father. It’s not nice or healthy for the child to be alienated and he should have a relationship with her, he clearly adores her.

I agree he definitely didn’t come across well on made in Chelsea. But would take it with a pinch of salt.

Also I’m pretty sure the “partying and drinking with her mates” he was having a go at her about on the show was actually about Binky and Louise going on all night benders with loads of drugs involved reading between the lines (out all night until 6am etc etc). It’s well known the cast were all at it. Not justifying his reaction, but they clearly can’t mention going on massive binges on the show as it’s illegal but it makes his reaction seem slightly less extreme. Especially as he doesn’t seem the type to like those sort of nights. But without the real context he defo comes across as controlling. Just my theory/opinion though!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
A child's father is their father. He's clearly a great dad to India and max is simply her step dad and shouldn't be labelled anything else.
plus it was a tv show a very long time ago. If you listen to Spencer and Jamie on a podcast recently Jamie admitted he played up to his character to get more storylines etc. Spencer was horrendous too and now he's a great dad and husband. It's an entertainment business
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
I disagree. 1. It’s a TV show that’s clearly edited for drama. All the podcasts coming out with the ex cast members confirm a lot of it is contrived.
2. From his social media he seems to really love his daughter.
He is India’s father. It’s not nice or healthy for the child to be alienated and he should have a relationship with her, he clearly adores her.

I agree he definitely didn’t come across well on made in Chelsea. But would take it with a pinch of salt.

Also I’m pretty sure the “partying and drinking with her mates” he was having a go at her about on the show was actually about Binky and Louise going on all night benders with loads of drugs involved reading between the lines (out all night until 6am etc etc). It’s well known the cast were all at it. Not justifying his reaction, but they clearly can’t mention going on massive binges on the show as it’s illegal but it makes his reaction seem slightly less extreme. Especially as he doesn’t seem the type to like those sort of nights. But without the real context he defo comes across as controlling. Just my theory/opinion though!

Yes, because he's highly likely to post pics of him mistreating her. Sorry, but we need an eye roll emoji.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3
At least when she's with him she's not palmed off to the nanny, Binky rarely has her own kids by herself. It's evident as whenever Max goes away for work she makes a big song & dance about solo parenting 😂 All the influencers are the same. She'd sell her kids out (and has) for any bits of cash thrown her way
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Yes, because he's highly likely to post pics of him mistreating her. Sorry, but we need an eye roll emoji.
Where has him mistreating her come from? just saying it’s not like he’s an absent dad.
From the 0.0001% we see their lives it’s not like any of us actually know much about these people. But if a child is being mistreated I’m sure close family, friends and her mother would be the first to intervene as that’s very serious.

The point I was making is around the fact he clearly is a father to her and wants to be involved in her life, and sees her regularly, so seems harsh to just erase him in place for Max based on the fact he was a bit of a tool on a fairly scripted reality show 6 years ago.

Would also say I respect JP for not making India part of sponsorships on Instagram.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Where has him mistreating her come from? just saying it’s not like he’s an absent dad.
From the 0.0001% we see their lives it’s not like any of us actually know much about these people. But if a child is being mistreated I’m sure close family, friends and her mother would be the first to intervene as that’s very serious.

The point I was making is around the fact he clearly is a father to her and wants to be involved in her life, and sees her regularly, so seems harsh to just erase him in place for Max based on the fact he was a bit of a tool on a fairly scripted reality show 6 years ago.

Would also say I respect JP for not making India part of sponsorships on Instagram.

My point was that of course he will post pics on social media because it gives him a narrative and makes him look like a good parent. I have no idea if he is or isn't but we should not be judging people's parenting from social media - it's all smoke and mirrors. And actually, IMVHO children should not be posted on any platform full stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I’ve met JP at charity events and he idolises his daughter. Literally lives for that kid.

He’s a great dad. You can’t fake the look of pure joy on his face when he talks about India.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.