It does make me wonder about their custody arrangement. Seems unfair on him but I suppose we don’t know the ins and outs.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
. But seems like she's with him every week and he has full weeks during school holidays, she was with him for Christmas, half terms etc.
Don't forget it's Binky who shares everything about her children. Not long ago her son ended up in hospital and there she was posting pictures on his hospital bed. Any thing to stay relevant!
I'm the member that Marbles was talking about. I deleted that account after my apology, and hadn't come back on here since, but was curious last night and did. I can't believe it blew up the way it did! I know most people want to move on, and so do I, but after reading all the other comments from her I just wanted to clarify what really happened as I feel she completely misunderstood the situation and did blow it quite a bit out of proportion.
When I saw India, it was a street away from the school, which is the main thoroughfare for all foot and vehicle traffic. It wasn't at the school gate at all, which she kept repeating in every reply she made about it. I had parked my car and was walking to school to pick up my child when I spotted the woman with the buggy and dog walking towards me first, then a child walking quite far behind her. As they got closer and passed by me, that's when I recognised the child as India. I continued down the street, turned the corner, then saw the ice-cream van parked on the street that the school is actually on.
I feel as though her interpretation of it was me at the school gate in large sunglasses, a wig and a trench coat, holding binoculars with the sole purpose of spying on an innocent child to report back all my findings to everyone here and that's not what it was at all. It was just a passing moment while I was on the school run.
I do understand and respect Marbles view that I probably shouldn't have commented at all, and I won't be commenting on anything else I may witness in future, but what I don't understand is her continuously calling my actions vile, as that is a very strong word that I would personally use to describe much worse actions than that.
Anyway, sorry to everyone for bringing this back up again and thanks to those that understood my intentions.
Back to regularly scheduled programming now...
When I saw India, it was a street away from the school, which is the main thoroughfare for all foot and vehicle traffic. It wasn't at the school gate at all, which she kept repeating in every reply she made about it. I had parked my car and was walking to school to pick up my child when I spotted the woman with the buggy and dog walking towards me first, then a child walking quite far behind her. As they got closer and passed by me, that's when I recognised the child as India. I continued down the street, turned the corner, then saw the ice-cream van parked on the street that the school is actually on.
I feel as though her interpretation of it was me at the school gate in large sunglasses, a wig and a trench coat, holding binoculars with the sole purpose of spying on an innocent child to report back all my findings to everyone here and that's not what it was at all. It was just a passing moment while I was on the school run.
I do understand and respect Marbles view that I probably shouldn't have commented at all, and I won't be commenting on anything else I may witness in future, but what I don't understand is her continuously calling my actions vile, as that is a very strong word that I would personally use to describe much worse actions than that.
Anyway, sorry to everyone for bringing this back up again and thanks to those that understood my intentions.
Back to regularly scheduled programming now...
Freedom of speech and all that. She is entitled to her opinion ascare you!
Freedom of speech as I mentioned in another post. You are entitled to write what you want. It's your account. Don't forget Binky craves attention and continually posts about her children..even when sick in hospital. I wouldn't justify what you write to anyone. The criers are probably just jealous they aren't fortunate to have a child at a prestigious school.
Don’t apologise. You commented on what you saw, due to her mums actions. You’re free to say what you want - although I just told you not to apologise!!
The bouquet in the air is beyond tacky I remember when I got married 15 years ago brides started doing it to be “rock n roll” sadly it’s just naff. Especially as you’re already married and had a wedding and reception including a London bus last year.She does look gorgeous to be fair but it cracks me up how Max looks like a prop rather than the groom
Who is she trying to kid it comes across as completely pathetic.
This is obviously bothering you but don’t let it-Binky has plastered India all over SM since she was born-a lot of ‘celebrities’ hide their kids faces but she chooses not to. What’s actually ‘vile’ in all of this is a woman who uses her children at every opportunity for engagement.
Please don't let one Tattler get to you. What you said and did wasn't "vile" (
), you just mentioned an observation and I'm pretty sure the rest of us got what you meant.
The villain here is Binky McSellmykids and the fake picture perfect family life she shills. Kids have tantrums. It's real, let's not pretend otherwise.
Also, Marbles has tattled about spotting Louise from MIC in public so I guess they're a creeper in trench coat and dark glasses with you.
), you just mentioned an observation and I'm pretty sure the rest of us got what you meant. The villain here is Binky McSellmykids and the fake picture perfect family life she shills. Kids have tantrums. It's real, let's not pretend otherwise.
Also, Marbles has tattled about spotting Louise from MIC in public so I guess they're a creeper in trench coat and dark glasses with you.
Last edited:
The imagery of us in trench coats and dark glasses is reminding me of Sex and the City when Samantha wears the same to spy on Richard when she thought he was cheating on her and it's hilarious.Please don't let one Tattler get to you. What you said and did wasn't "vile" (
The villain here is Binky McSellmykids and the fake picture perfect family life she shills. Kids have tantrums. It's real, let's not pretend otherwise.
Also, Marbles has tattled about spotting Louise from MIC in public so I guess they're a creeper in trench coat and dark glasses with you.
I was obviously totally joking when I said I'd be a secret spy for this thread, but I guess my sarcastic sense of humor didn't translate as well as I'd hoped.
Thanks to those that understood though.
For Christ’s sake why is she posting pictures of her naked children on her story? Is she actually that thick that she doesn’t comprehend that a) her children cannot consent to her doing this, b) there are some really bleeping awful people out there that could see the pictures and c) SAFEGUARDING. She makes my blood bleeping book the vacuous idiot.
The pics she’s just posted of her kids..my god!! Now that is where you would use the word “vile”…vile because of the safeguarding implications of these pictures and the number of vile people out there who will be looking at them. She’s disgusting
I think she’s taken the one of India down. She’s an absolute head
Or maybe it’s because I reported it and can’t see it?? Either way someone needs to have a word with her!
I’ve just checked and she’s taken it down. I’m hoping JP absolutely tore her a new one about it!! She has left the ones of the baby up though
I just don’t understand why she would do it! It’s really infuriated me!!I’ve just checked and she’s taken it down. I’m hoping JP absolutely tore her a new one about it!! She has left the ones of the baby up though
I wouldn't even post photos like that of my children on my private Instagram and I only allow people I actually know in real life to follow me on there. I would never dream of doing it on a completely public account, particularly if I was in the public eye too.
Maybe she had too many poolside drinks and wasn't thinking clearly.
Maybe she had too many poolside drinks and wasn't thinking clearly.
She was thinking clearly enough to put the tiniest emoji's over India's private bits and colour out the baby's bits
Literally affording them as LITTLE privacy as she possibly could. Also isn't India a bit too big to be nude at the beach?! She's not a baby at the very least throw some bottoms on her
You have no need to apologise! Nobody else was thinking all those things about you! And no need to explain yourself either! We're literally on a forum that talks about other people, seems a bit silly that people are complaining about you doing exactly that (and hypocritical) you carry on writing whatever you want, freedom of speech and all that!
Thank you so much x
- Status