Definitely don't disagree with your important points. Any law would have to be created with robust input from disability rights groups too. I totally get what those groups mean when they say no assisted dying without assisted living. I understand why people find it objectionable that society is debating assisted dying when so many aren't given the resources they need to assist them to live. I just find it wrong on a deep instinctive level that we can leave people to suffer unspeakably. Adults with capacity are given the autonomy to consent to or refuse treatments. That should extend to not prolonging a painful death too.I put no as you absolutely cannot prevent coercion and persuasion as human beings can’t help it. See what’s happening in Canada where people are subtly and not so subtly nudged to make this choice because the state won’t care for people adequately. It’s not surprising this is coming up now when there’s a large aging population we can’t support. It’s also very telling that conversations about assisted dying chosen freely by the individual very quickly turns to conversation about euthanasia chosen on someone else’s behalf. This is a very dangerous path to go down. People will definitely make the ‘choice’ to die rather than go into care and have to sell their home in order for children to inherit. This will almost certainly be encouraged within some families