Hmmm that's unusual... Maybe they micromanage hiring decisions? What's your gut feel?
Without wishing to sound like an utter cock, I'm overqualified and experienced for the advertised role and I've always had positive interactions with the organisation in the multiple (and multitude of) tasks I've handled - generally in terms of things improving from their point of view. So maybe my name's cropped up enough for it to be noticed. If I were even vaguely important and dealing with recruitment decisions, in all honesty, I'd be looking at this applicant and thinking 'Hmmmm. That's interesting. There's a lot of potential here that we could use for... if we can get them onboard'.
Spoke to a couple of senior colleagues privately today and they both said independently that it's not a normal panel for the advertised role, spoke very highly of them and that I shouldn't be surprised if they turned out to have other ideas.
Could just be me being paranoid/suspicious/overthinking it and it's perfectly normal for actual, real VIPs to slum it with the interviews. But the colleagues said the same - although they've also suggested not to hold back, but to try and guide the panel towards giving me an opportunity to go into full problem solving so they can see exactly how my brain fires up when it's got something to work with.
Worst case is that they don't want what I've got/don't like me or I decide I don't like the sound of what they're offering - which means I stay where I am, just with work knowing that I'm not actually prepared to take everything flung at me forever and I
could leave at any point if they continue to do so.
I guess the only way I'll find out is to drag out my best formal work frock, a pair of sensible shoes and get myself down there, really.