yeahyouhun
VIP Member
I’m sat here right now in an in the style Gemma Collins top. I can honestly say I’ve been given better quality T-shirt’s for free on bar crawls in magaluf
Comments like this really annoy me! Trying to put someone down if they don’t have kids.I presume you don’t have children? That’s life everyday.
I actually really liked it with the kids there, the normal, no faking.
Yes just youIs it just me that loves Adam & Jamie? I find them both hilarious!
Hi AdamThe CEO stuff isn’t actually correct, I know because I used to work at ITS for a few years up until last year. The CEO change was something Adam had in the works for a looooong time. He definitely wasn’t demoted Adam was quite open with people about his plans and from what I gathered internally everyone supported him . I think it took over a year to find the new one as he had started looking before I left. I personally, never had any issues with the boys and didn’t leave on bad terms I just realised fast fashion wasn’t for me and although I’m not a fan of the business model and fast fashion in general from what I’ve seen on his socials the money he’s made he’s actually really helped people.
Lots of companies choose to list publicly to grow the company to become bigger, also his shares were worth about £35m at the time it listed so yeah he essentially sold his business but retains a portion of shares. The company issued a profit warning in September which essentially means that when they listed publicly they set out the expected growth of the business, and shortly after listing they had to warn shareholders that the business wasn’t going to grow as quickly as they initially suggested. Most CEOs / CFOs just about survive a profit warning announcement but shareholders lose confidence in the CEO / CFO because it’s a clear demonstration that the business isn’t being run well and it leads to share price drop so those shareholders lose money… so it’s very likely that the profit warning is the reason he is being demoted.So why wo
This is very interesting. So why would he have done that ? Did he make a lot of money from doing it?
But he pulled the rail with all the clothing on down not once but 3 times ...so that's acceptable behaviour? I don't think the pandemic can be used to excuse piss poor parenting and children that are allowed to behave exactly how they want with no consequences. We've all seen the 'cute' 2 year olds that turn into obnoxious badly behaved children...no longer cute or sweet or funny. That's exactly where Mick jnr is heading !I wouldn’t really say it’s a professional shoot when it’s in her own grounds, with an iPhone. It’s not like she’s in the Maldives or Paris like the others.
She seems more relatable doing it at home.
She may have a nanny and Joe MAY have been there but if she wants her kids around then that’s up to her not Adam, he knew what he was getting into as she’s done it a few times.
Also, I wasn’t trying to “shame” you it was simply an opinion of mine. I’ve worked from home, with help, with two kids and this is exactly like my house. Nothing stops your kids wanting their mum, don’t like it - don’t look
All I was saying is my son is the same age as Rex, they’re built differently. The pandemic has changed them, they’re clingy, they’re ignorant and they want to run about. No one knows what goes on behind her doors so if she didn’t want him to be there he wouldn’t of been.
Wow. Harsh. Nothing to do with if I have kids or not. I was saying that for a supposed professional shoot, it didn’t look that. They admitted themselves it took twice as long because of interruptions. You never see Billie, Jac, Gemma, Carys, Ash, Greedy, Ladbabymum, Dani (ITS collabs who are also mums) take their kids along to their shoots and let them interrupt their work. Joe was at home so he could easily have looked after them. My opinion and you trying to shame me for having it won’t change my mindI presume you don’t have children? That’s life everyday.
I actually really liked it with the kids there, the normal, no faking.
Thank you Thing is it’s well known, SS has a nanny plus Joe was there. My point was Adam only puts up with it cos it’s her. Can you imagine if all their collabs that are mums took their children to their shoots and let them run all over the place? They tolerate it with Stacey cos she’s their favourite. He goes to all her shoots where some of his collabs he’s never even been to one. My original post was actually more about him but there’s always someone that takes offence and chooses to read it how they want and not actually how it’s meantComments like this really annoy me! Trying to put someone down if they don’t have kids.
It’s a professional shoot and kids shouldn’t be there, it’s not like she can’t afford childcare!
This Adam or Jamie?Honestly the people on this site get over yourself.