I did think this, but Carrantha is in Ireland and I wasn’t sure if they used the same number!101 call is the non-emergency number - probs referring to the welfare check
Do we think this woman is even legit??? Or is she Samanthajadewhateverelseshescalled????Changing the subject now, do we reckon that our journalist/investigator friend will come through and the long awaited article will happen?
Now there's a flashback! Was it Limeybean who faked having cancer?I knew this couldn’t be trueI can’t believe how many people fall for things without questioning them at all. Guess very few people remember the terminal illness lady from Live Journal who also turned out to be a massive fake (to the extent she posted as her “daughter” after she “died”).
We’ve got a saying at work, just because you’re old or disabled doesn’t mean you’re a good person!
Might put a statement out stating I'm the prime minister.The algorithm for TikTok is on point. Just opened the app and the first video is from three days ago of someone who read out the statement and says shame on everyone who disbelieved her. The bar is very bloody low if someone putting out a statement means they must be believed.
I will believe you 100%. Anyone who doesn’t believe you is a hater and a troll. Shame on them!!Might put a statement out stating I'm the prime minister.
Couldn't be further from the truth but by tiktok logic, it must be true if I make a statement about it.
Honestly, their attitude of "she's disabled, she can't lie and/or do bad things!" is so bleeping offensive. So worried about being ableist that all critical thinking goes out of the window and they end up being, uh, ableist. I can't get over it. Hate the term virtue signalling but that's exactly what it is and they are not people we want or need on side. How is it acceptable to target the parents of disabled children and scam them out of Christmas presents? To take grants and funds for disabled writers/artists? To take up our spaces and speak over us with utter bull? I need one of them to explain that to me. Nevermind the caring for children under a false name, that's just a safeguarding nightmare.The algorithm for TikTok is on point. Just opened the app and the first video is from three days ago of someone who read out the statement and says shame on everyone who disbelieved her. The bar is very bloody low if someone putting out a statement means they must be believed.
DARLING PM can you cut my taxes plsMight put a statement out stating I'm the prime minister.
Couldn't be further from the truth but by tiktok logic, it must be true if I make a statement about it.
This x100.. i feel uncomfortable with what is being openly discussed now, when I saw the notes I didn't know what to think but it didn't feel rightexcuse my brain dump…
After reading the notes, I feel like all this discussion around what can only be described as an incredibly vulnerable, mentally unwell woman who has effectively lost both her children under traumatic circumstances, is not what I signed up for.
I was interested when I thought that this was a cut and dry scammer situation.
I agree, we have decided not to discuss that part of it on here as I think we are primarily interested in the current Airbnb matter and the events surrounding that rather than a timeline of this woman’s trauma.excuse my brain dump…
After reading the notes, I feel like all this discussion around what can only be described as an incredibly vulnerable, mentally unwell woman who has effectively lost both her children under traumatic circumstances, is not what I signed up for.
I was interested when I thought that this was a cut and dry scammer situation. But people are now gleefully discussing the lack of dead babies on Ancestry and sharing private mental health / custody court notes as entertainment/clout. I think it’s pretty obvious that this poor woman, regardless of her scams, has experienced every parent’s worst nightmare and has resulting severe mental health issues driving her to act like this.
It’s also very possible that she has disassociated from her ‘former self’ due to the trauma of losing her child, to the extent, that she truly believes Samantha is a different person.
I believe she had a baby that died because she’s NEVER mentioned it. Her current life is a fabrication which she is at ease discussing and it probably serves as a distraction from losing a 4 month baby. She would have got plenty of attention and possibly money if she’d discussed her baby and her older child on TT, but she didn’t once mention them probably because it was real, triggering and traumatising.
It’s interesting that she sought support and validation from strangers during the HD/Airbnb situation as maybe she didn’t get support when she experienced trauma of losing her baby. The timeline of her losing a baby, the surrogacy scam, then going ‘missing’ and moving to another country after cutting off her family - she isolated herself away from the people who should be supporting her. I do believe that she enjoyed helping people and supporting them too.
It’s also interesting to me that after losing a baby, her first scam involved pregnancy. Maybe she just wanted to be pregnant and have a baby again. Not excusing it obviously, but she clearly wasnt in her right mind and/or heavily medicated.
After reading those notes, I just feel like this is potentially something on a whole other level that I don’t understand and I just want her to get help. I also want those she scammed to be supported too and get refunded. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
Agree fully. Posting the notes is sick and I don’t agree with it at all. We are not entitled to read those private things.excuse my brain dump…
After reading the notes, I feel like all this discussion around what can only be described as an incredibly vulnerable, mentally unwell woman who has effectively lost both her children under traumatic circumstances, is not what I signed up for.
I was interested when I thought that this was a cut and dry scammer situation. But people are now gleefully discussing the lack of dead babies on Ancestry and sharing private mental health / custody court notes as entertainment/clout. I think it’s pretty obvious that this poor woman, regardless of her scams, has experienced every parent’s worst nightmare and has resulting severe mental health issues driving her to act like this.
It’s also very possible that she has disassociated from her ‘former self’ due to the trauma of losing her child, to the extent, that she truly believes Samantha is a different person.
I believe she had a baby that died because she’s NEVER mentioned it. Her current life is a fabrication which she is at ease discussing and it probably serves as a distraction from losing a 4 month baby. She would have got plenty of attention and possibly money if she’d discussed her baby and her older child on TT, but she didn’t once mention them probably because it was real, triggering and traumatising.
It’s interesting that she sought support and validation from strangers during the HD/Airbnb situation as maybe she didn’t get support when she experienced trauma of losing her baby. The timeline of her losing a baby, the surrogacy scam, then going ‘missing’ and moving to another country after cutting off her family - she isolated herself away from the people who should be supporting her. I do believe that she enjoyed helping people and supporting them too.
It’s also interesting to me that after losing a baby, her first scam involved pregnancy. Maybe she just wanted to be pregnant and have a baby again. Not excusing it obviously, but she clearly wasnt in her right mind and/or heavily medicated.
After reading those notes, I just feel like this is potentially something on a whole other level that I don’t understand and I just want her to get help. I also want those she scammed to be supported too and get refunded. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.