Nothing. She implied that the police would give her an update but she’s not said anything.So what was the update on the welfare check?
Nothing. She implied that the police would give her an update but she’s not said anything.So what was the update on the welfare check?
So if I say the same thing as a disabled person...? They just gonna eugenics me? What a bunch of mats. Able bodied people acting like this on our behalf helps nobody.I got a horrible comment back on tiktok when I replied to a comment about Samantha showing up on Ansestery and no Carrie.
"Maybe you should consider if your life is valuable enough to be on this planet if you're questioning what a disabled person has said, because I'd say it's not"
It's okay for them to be horrible to everyone else but doubting a possible fraudster is wrong just because she's disabled![]()
I assumed the baby thing was true because it was part of her defence for the surrogacy scam, so surely she would have had to submit documentation for evidence? Maybe someone more clued up on law than I am might know. I would imagine if your primary defence is that you’d recently suffered a bereavement you’d have to submit evidence to prove that?So if I say the same thing as a disabled person...? They just gonna eugenics me? What a bunch of mats. Able bodied people acting like this on our behalf helps nobody.
Anyway, someone on reddit said they can't find any trace of her baby so I went to check as I'd just assumed what was said in court was correct. No record of this baby. I checked under maiden names Cookes and Williams and nothing. Did she register it under another fake name? You can't have those records hidden, can you?
PS has anyone actually seen these death threats? Cause I haven't and this tit is straight out of the JM Grifting Handbook.
Would the baby be likely to show up on Ancestry if true? I’ve never used anything like that so I have no idea, but seems a few people on here are very good at finding people’s records.I assumed the baby thing was true because it was part of her defence for the surrogacy scam, so surely she would have had to submit documentation for evidence? Maybe someone more clued up on law than I am might know. I would imagine if your primary defence is that you’d recently suffered a bereavement you’d have to submit evidence to prove that?
Ah I just saw this: I wondered the same, wouldn’t a child of this person show up on Ancestry? I didn’t know if these databases had rules about age at which they add people or anything, I honestly have no clue.So if I say the same thing as a disabled person...? They just gonna eugenics me? What a bunch of mats. Able bodied people acting like this on our behalf helps nobody.
Anyway, someone on reddit said they can't find any trace of her baby so I went to check as I'd just assumed what was said in court was correct. No record of this baby. I checked under maiden names Cookes and Williams and nothing. Did she register it under another fake name? You can't have those records hidden, can you?
I assumed the baby thing was true because it was part of her defence for the surrogacy scam, so surely she would have had to submit documentation for evidence? Maybe someone more clued up on law than I am might know. I would imagine if your primary defence is that you’d recently suffered a bereavement you’d have to submit evidence to prove that?
Well I'd assumed the same thing with it being her defence in court so didn't actually look when I was figuring out the rest of the family tree but after reading that comment I went searching myself. Nothing on Ancestry. I might ask my mum if she knows anything about why there might not be records available but she's definitely gonna think I'm a right weirdo spending my time on this (and using her account)Would the baby be likely to show up on Ancestry if true? I’ve never used anything like that so I have no idea, but seems a few people on here are very good at finding people’s records.
Aah thank you. There are some that come up from after 2005 but they seem to be limited, checked it with my mate's 9 year old and she doesn't come up.“Our England & Wales Birth, Marriage and Death (BMD) Index collections (1837 - 2005) provide the most complete resource available online. All of these records are completely name searchable. For vital records before 1837, we have the Parish Registers, where you can find UK parish baptism, marriage and burial records.”
Birth records on ancestry only go up to 2005. They have up to date ish records for the electoral register, but of course a baby would not be on one.
According to someone that knows her, she always had tendencies towards compulsive lying. I’m sure the death of her daughter would not have helped, but it sounds like she was always wired that way.I still think she may have had a baby and the cot death would explain her mental illness that drives her to lie like this.
But she also said in a letter to the court
"‘I truly am sorry,’ she wrote. ‘Now I am in intensive therapy, I can see that I never dealt with my grief after my daughter’s sudden death and I am sorry this caused me to hurt other people"
If she did have intensive therapy it didn't work. I would have thought she would have had to provide proof of the death of her child during the case but maybe she didn't.
While Ancestry is helpful I do at least slightly agree with people when they say it's not exhaustive and might not have everyone. I still think there's enough evidence without Ancestry that Carrie is Samantha but I don't know about her child.
Yeah now I've stopped being dumb about records after 2005 I'm back to believing the baby partI still think she may have had a baby and the cot death would explain her mental illness that drives her to lie like this.
But she also said in a letter to the court
"‘I truly am sorry,’ she wrote. ‘Now I am in intensive therapy, I can see that I never dealt with my grief after my daughter’s sudden death and I am sorry this caused me to hurt other people"
If she did have intensive therapy it didn't work. I would have thought she would have had to provide proof of the death of her child during the case but maybe she didn't.
While Ancestry is helpful I do at least slightly agree with people when they say it's not exhaustive and might not have everyone. I still think there's enough evidence without Ancestry that Carrie is Samantha but I don't know about her child.
I think it would show up on the GRO indexes on the government website? If you know the name of the baby it would be really easy to find on there, but if not I’m not sure it’s possible. Maybe she made a post about the baby on insta or something“Our England & Wales Birth, Marriage and Death (BMD) Index collections (1837 - 2005) provide the most complete resource available online. All of these records are completely name searchable. For vital records before 1837, we have the Parish Registers, where you can find UK parish baptism, marriage and burial records.”
Birth records on ancestry only go up to 2005. They have up to date ish records for the electoral register, but of course a baby would not be on one.
It was on 1 article she did. So I doubt they've seen anything about it. Someone could probably directly tweet them about it and they wouldn't give 2 crapsSorry if someone else has already said this and I've missed it, but surely netflix would have something to say if she's been telling journalists lies and saying she's done a documentary with them? I wonder if it's been brought to their attention
It's clearly not true as the only hits for it on Google are in a few interviews with carrie/samantha.
Just looked it up. Unfortunately she doesn't say "I'm Lucy Hart" in the video and it's kinda blurry so people aren't going to believe that's proof of anything.Has anyone seen the TikTok of her doing the ice bucket challenge and using the name Lucy hart? How many times has she done this
I'm curious how she manages to do all these things if she's so far into Huntingtons that she only has 2 years, even 5 left.I found this post on FB from someone who went to one of Carrie's workshops (apologies if this was shared before).
I never thought interacting with strangers for two hours would be quite so... satisfying. I’ve been doing a few of @marianne_power_writer ‘s Writing for Sanity workshops, with (mostly) women from the UK, Europe and USA. We have nothing in common except what last year gifted us - new fears and uncertainties along with exacerbating previously existing anxieties. So we meet and we let Marianne’s gentle guidance heal us for some time. Last Sunday, the workshop was co-hosted by @carriejadewrites . How do I describe Carrie - a young woman who has turned her life around and is an immense source of joy and inspiration by just being herself - is an understatement. I wrote my first newsletter because I wanted to remember what she said in those two hours. What I learnt from her. And I wanted to remember how her words and animated face gave me strength and joy. I also wanted to share what I felt were essential life lessons from Carrie - some are basic truths that I needed reminding of, and others are perspectives I never considered.
This is an entirely personal takeaway from the workshop How to Love Your Life - and if I have misread or misinterpreted anything - that’s all on me. However, I hope you read this and feel just slightly more in love with life - in whatever way possible. I’m happy to send the PDF to whoever wants to read more.
Thank you @marianne_power_writer and @carriejadewrites
They share more about Carrie in the attached images.
Main points that Carrie claims in the images:
- She was diagnosed in 2019. Didn't she say she was diagnosed during the pandemic? (the OP may have just got this wrong).
- She was given 2 years to live (not 5)
- She's a chemical engineer
- She's lost 70% of her temporal lobe
- She's written a book and a screenplay.
- She's doing a masters in neuroscience
- She's getting married soon (this post is from feb 2021)
- She can't apply makeup anymore
- She writes 50 thank you notes a week