thisworldcanbeaccessible

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Police welfare checks are pretty basic. They won’t do much, they’ll check the person is alive, do a very basic assessment on them ie they’ll ask them if they need help or need support. They’ll toddle off if the person says no and says they are fine and the police can’t see anything to be concerned about. They also can’t share any info without that persons consent to anyone even the caller of the welfare check. So the most she’ll be told is “we’ve checked on the person concerned, we have no concerns, they are ok”.
Honestly, when can Tiktok go back to silly dances and cooking and kitten videos and all of the self righteousness and vigilantism die a death. It’s all over my FYP with people duetting and calling out people and the Maz women who claimed she needed to tell her followers out of obligation or something clearly needs to get a job and have her phone taken away.

bring back the kittens I say!!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
I got a horrible comment back on tiktok when I replied to a comment about Samantha showing up on Ansestery and no Carrie.

"Maybe you should consider if your life is valuable enough to be on this planet if you're questioning what a disabled person has said, because I'd say it's not"

It's okay for them to be horrible to everyone else but doubting a possible fraudster is wrong just because she's disabled 🙃
So if I say the same thing as a disabled person...? They just gonna eugenics me? What a bunch of mats. Able bodied people acting like this on our behalf helps nobody.

Anyway, someone on reddit said they can't find any trace of her baby so I went to check as I'd just assumed what was said in court was correct. No record of this baby. I checked under maiden names Cookes and Williams and nothing. Did she register it under another fake name? You can't have those records hidden, can you?

PS has anyone actually seen these death threats? Cause I haven't and this tit is straight out of the JM Grifting Handbook.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
So if I say the same thing as a disabled person...? They just gonna eugenics me? What a bunch of mats. Able bodied people acting like this on our behalf helps nobody.

Anyway, someone on reddit said they can't find any trace of her baby so I went to check as I'd just assumed what was said in court was correct. No record of this baby. I checked under maiden names Cookes and Williams and nothing. Did she register it under another fake name? You can't have those records hidden, can you?

PS has anyone actually seen these death threats? Cause I haven't and this tit is straight out of the JM Grifting Handbook.
I assumed the baby thing was true because it was part of her defence for the surrogacy scam, so surely she would have had to submit documentation for evidence? Maybe someone more clued up on law than I am might know. I would imagine if your primary defence is that you’d recently suffered a bereavement you’d have to submit evidence to prove that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I assumed the baby thing was true because it was part of her defence for the surrogacy scam, so surely she would have had to submit documentation for evidence? Maybe someone more clued up on law than I am might know. I would imagine if your primary defence is that you’d recently suffered a bereavement you’d have to submit evidence to prove that?
Would the baby be likely to show up on Ancestry if true? I’ve never used anything like that so I have no idea, but seems a few people on here are very good at finding people’s records.

So if I say the same thing as a disabled person...? They just gonna eugenics me? What a bunch of mats. Able bodied people acting like this on our behalf helps nobody.

Anyway, someone on reddit said they can't find any trace of her baby so I went to check as I'd just assumed what was said in court was correct. No record of this baby. I checked under maiden names Cookes and Williams and nothing. Did she register it under another fake name? You can't have those records hidden, can you?
Ah I just saw this: I wondered the same, wouldn’t a child of this person show up on Ancestry? I didn’t know if these databases had rules about age at which they add people or anything, I honestly have no clue.

I’m disabled too and I feel the same as you. If it turns out against all odds that this woman is telling the truth, I’ll be happy in a way because I’m so angry at the idea someone could exploit the disabled community so horribly. We fight so many battles daily to be believed and liars make that a million times harder for us all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I assumed the baby thing was true because it was part of her defence for the surrogacy scam, so surely she would have had to submit documentation for evidence? Maybe someone more clued up on law than I am might know. I would imagine if your primary defence is that you’d recently suffered a bereavement you’d have to submit evidence to prove that?
Would the baby be likely to show up on Ancestry if true? I’ve never used anything like that so I have no idea, but seems a few people on here are very good at finding people’s records.
Well I'd assumed the same thing with it being her defence in court so didn't actually look when I was figuring out the rest of the family tree but after reading that comment I went searching myself. Nothing on Ancestry. I might ask my mum if she knows anything about why there might not be records available but she's definitely gonna think I'm a right weirdo spending my time on this (and using her account) 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
“Our England & Wales Birth, Marriage and Death (BMD) Index collections (1837 - 2005) provide the most complete resource available online. All of these records are completely name searchable. For vital records before 1837, we have the Parish Registers, where you can find UK parish baptism, marriage and burial records.”

Birth records on ancestry only go up to 2005. They have up to date ish records for the electoral register, but of course a baby would not be on one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
“Our England & Wales Birth, Marriage and Death (BMD) Index collections (1837 - 2005) provide the most complete resource available online. All of these records are completely name searchable. For vital records before 1837, we have the Parish Registers, where you can find UK parish baptism, marriage and burial records.”

Birth records on ancestry only go up to 2005. They have up to date ish records for the electoral register, but of course a baby would not be on one.
Aah thank you. There are some that come up from after 2005 but they seem to be limited, checked it with my mate's 9 year old and she doesn't come up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I still think she may have had a baby and the cot death would explain her mental illness that drives her to lie like this.

But she also said in a letter to the court

"‘I truly am sorry,’ she wrote. ‘Now I am in intensive therapy, I can see that I never dealt with my grief after my daughter’s sudden death and I am sorry this caused me to hurt other people"

If she did have intensive therapy it didn't work. I would have thought she would have had to provide proof of the death of her child during the case but maybe she didn't.

While Ancestry is helpful I do at least slightly agree with people when they say it's not exhaustive and might not have everyone. I still think there's enough evidence without Ancestry that Carrie is Samantha but I don't know about her child.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I still think she may have had a baby and the cot death would explain her mental illness that drives her to lie like this.

But she also said in a letter to the court

"‘I truly am sorry,’ she wrote. ‘Now I am in intensive therapy, I can see that I never dealt with my grief after my daughter’s sudden death and I am sorry this caused me to hurt other people"

If she did have intensive therapy it didn't work. I would have thought she would have had to provide proof of the death of her child during the case but maybe she didn't.

While Ancestry is helpful I do at least slightly agree with people when they say it's not exhaustive and might not have everyone. I still think there's enough evidence without Ancestry that Carrie is Samantha but I don't know about her child.
According to someone that knows her, she always had tendencies towards compulsive lying. I’m sure the death of her daughter would not have helped, but it sounds like she was always wired that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I still think she may have had a baby and the cot death would explain her mental illness that drives her to lie like this.

But she also said in a letter to the court

"‘I truly am sorry,’ she wrote. ‘Now I am in intensive therapy, I can see that I never dealt with my grief after my daughter’s sudden death and I am sorry this caused me to hurt other people"

If she did have intensive therapy it didn't work. I would have thought she would have had to provide proof of the death of her child during the case but maybe she didn't.

While Ancestry is helpful I do at least slightly agree with people when they say it's not exhaustive and might not have everyone. I still think there's enough evidence without Ancestry that Carrie is Samantha but I don't know about her child.
Yeah now I've stopped being dumb about records after 2005 I'm back to believing the baby part 😅 sounds like she's always been a liar but it spiralled out of control after that. Definitely needs a lot more therapy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
“Our England & Wales Birth, Marriage and Death (BMD) Index collections (1837 - 2005) provide the most complete resource available online. All of these records are completely name searchable. For vital records before 1837, we have the Parish Registers, where you can find UK parish baptism, marriage and burial records.”

Birth records on ancestry only go up to 2005. They have up to date ish records for the electoral register, but of course a baby would not be on one.
I think it would show up on the GRO indexes on the government website? If you know the name of the baby it would be really easy to find on there, but if not I’m not sure it’s possible. Maybe she made a post about the baby on insta or something
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Sorry if someone else has already said this and I've missed it, but surely netflix would have something to say if she's been telling journalists lies and saying she's done a documentary with them? I wonder if it's been brought to their attention 🤔

It's clearly not true as the only hits for it on Google are in a few interviews with carrie/samantha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Sorry if someone else has already said this and I've missed it, but surely netflix would have something to say if she's been telling journalists lies and saying she's done a documentary with them? I wonder if it's been brought to their attention 🤔

It's clearly not true as the only hits for it on Google are in a few interviews with carrie/samantha.
It was on 1 article she did. So I doubt they've seen anything about it. Someone could probably directly tweet them about it and they wouldn't give 2 craps 🤷🏻‍♀️
Why would they, she's a nobody really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Has anyone seen the TikTok of her doing the ice bucket challenge and using the name Lucy hart? How many times has she done this
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Has anyone seen the TikTok of her doing the ice bucket challenge and using the name Lucy hart? How many times has she done this
Just looked it up. Unfortunately she doesn't say "I'm Lucy Hart" in the video and it's kinda blurry so people aren't going to believe that's proof of anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I’m kinda hoping that Netflix have been doing a documentary and they’ve been filming it throughout the past weeks while she’s been claiming she’s being sued and there’s lots of footage of them talking to each other like “somethings not right…” and we get to see the film makers go from thinking they are making a documentary about assistive tech to realising they’re in the epicentre of this con.
kinda like a catfish thing.
Unfortunately there’s probably zero chance of that happening but it would be good TV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I found this post on FB from someone who went to one of Carrie's workshops (apologies if this was shared before).

I never thought interacting with strangers for two hours would be quite so... satisfying. I’ve been doing a few of @marianne_power_writer ‘s Writing for Sanity workshops, with (mostly) women from the UK, Europe and USA. We have nothing in common except what last year gifted us - new fears and uncertainties along with exacerbating previously existing anxieties. So we meet and we let Marianne’s gentle guidance heal us for some time. Last Sunday, the workshop was co-hosted by @carriejadewrites . How do I describe Carrie - a young woman who has turned her life around and is an immense source of joy and inspiration by just being herself - is an understatement. I wrote my first newsletter because I wanted to remember what she said in those two hours. What I learnt from her. And I wanted to remember how her words and animated face gave me strength and joy. I also wanted to share what I felt were essential life lessons from Carrie - some are basic truths that I needed reminding of, and others are perspectives I never considered.
This is an entirely personal takeaway from the workshop How to Love Your Life - and if I have misread or misinterpreted anything - that’s all on me. However, I hope you read this and feel just slightly more in love with life - in whatever way possible. I’m happy to send the PDF to whoever wants to read more.
Thank you @marianne_power_writer and @carriejadewrites


They share more about Carrie in the attached images.

Main points that Carrie claims in the images:
  • She was diagnosed in 2019. Didn't she say she was diagnosed during the pandemic? (the OP may have just got this wrong).
  • She was given 2 years to live (not 5)
  • She's a chemical engineer
  • She's lost 70% of her temporal lobe
  • She's written a book and a screenplay.
  • She's doing a masters in neuroscience
  • She's getting married soon (this post is from feb 2021)
  • She can't apply makeup anymore
  • She writes 50 thank you notes a week
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 9
I found this post on FB from someone who went to one of Carrie's workshops (apologies if this was shared before).

I never thought interacting with strangers for two hours would be quite so... satisfying. I’ve been doing a few of @marianne_power_writer ‘s Writing for Sanity workshops, with (mostly) women from the UK, Europe and USA. We have nothing in common except what last year gifted us - new fears and uncertainties along with exacerbating previously existing anxieties. So we meet and we let Marianne’s gentle guidance heal us for some time. Last Sunday, the workshop was co-hosted by @carriejadewrites . How do I describe Carrie - a young woman who has turned her life around and is an immense source of joy and inspiration by just being herself - is an understatement. I wrote my first newsletter because I wanted to remember what she said in those two hours. What I learnt from her. And I wanted to remember how her words and animated face gave me strength and joy. I also wanted to share what I felt were essential life lessons from Carrie - some are basic truths that I needed reminding of, and others are perspectives I never considered.
This is an entirely personal takeaway from the workshop How to Love Your Life - and if I have misread or misinterpreted anything - that’s all on me. However, I hope you read this and feel just slightly more in love with life - in whatever way possible. I’m happy to send the PDF to whoever wants to read more.
Thank you @marianne_power_writer and @carriejadewrites


They share more about Carrie in the attached images.

Main points that Carrie claims in the images:
  • She was diagnosed in 2019. Didn't she say she was diagnosed during the pandemic? (the OP may have just got this wrong).
  • She was given 2 years to live (not 5)
  • She's a chemical engineer
  • She's lost 70% of her temporal lobe
  • She's written a book and a screenplay.
  • She's doing a masters in neuroscience
  • She's getting married soon (this post is from feb 2021)
  • She can't apply makeup anymore
  • She writes 50 thank you notes a week
I'm curious how she manages to do all these things if she's so far into Huntingtons that she only has 2 years, even 5 left.
And also early alzheimers on top of it?

Especially to be doing a masters in neuroscience... Yet apparently can't remember when she was diagnosed and can never remember stuff that happened the day before?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.