thisworldcanbeaccessible

[femmegirly]

I just saw it. lol “I can neither confirm nor deny that she is the person in question I can confirm that the surrogacy story is true” okay you just confirmed it then
In the comments she says she hasn’t seen her since childhood. What’s the betting this is fake profile

Very odd wording

She also confirms that Carrie/Samantha is not adopted and her parents don’t have huntingtons. Also that she cut her family out her life years ago including her brothers. She also confirms that the missing woman and surrogacy woman are the same people and that she moved to Ireland.

 

[butterfliesandhurricanes]

She also confirms that Carrie/Samantha is not adopted and her parents don’t have huntingtons. Also that she cut her family out her life years ago including her brothers.

but it’s just words on a random profile. I could do that lol. I think it’s suss that suddenly this random cousin has come out the woodwork. Im not saying this scam thing isn’t true I just think anyone can create a profile and pretend to be a family member

 

[AlwayswatchingAlways]

You are a wonderful human

Nah, I'm just a bit crazy!

 

[femmegirly]

but it’s just words on a random profile. I could do that lol. I think it’s suss that suddenly this random cousin has come out the woodwork. Im not saying this scam thing isn’t true I just think anyone can create a profile and pretend to be a family member

I thought so but then I looked her up on Facebook. Same person - you can see it’s the same person in the TikTok profile photo as the person on Facebook, and there’s a whole Cookes family connected to the cousin, living in the same town where Samatha Cookes is from. It’s a very uncommon surname.

 

[Justacatindisguise]

Her cousin Natalie Cookes has posted a video on TikTok. I looked her up on Facebook and she looks very like Carrie/Samantha. You can click through her profile and see the extended Cookes family all still living in Gloucester. The resemblance is uncanny. Very uncommon surname.

I've found a bunch of Williams through one of the Cookes as well.

Just got this.

 

[Jellyshoe92]

Hi thought I’d leave my thoughts here :

1. she maintained that the review had not been left yet as it was being argued with Airbnb but clearly that was a lie as it has indeed been published since august.

2. she stated that in the review they made discriminatory references and she was arguing for their names to be left off as she feared for them having abuse as a result of people reading how discriminatory they were - the review is in no way discriminatory to disabled people.

3. in the review they talk about not being able to smoke at the property, she never mentioned this on any video which I’d have thought she would as it seems to be a real issue to them.

4. she also never mentioned that the husband arrived on his own and in fact said that they arrived as a couple. In both the review and her reply it clearly states that he did arrive alone.

5. she often references that she has no mobility in her hands/fingers however a few days ago posted a TikTok video showing how to use some sensory equipment and the video showed her plugging in and unplugging a small piece of equipment which I found odd.

She did refuse any money etc from people however I wonder if she accepted any privately maybe or if this was a long game and she would eventually ask for help with legal fees?

Ive followed this lady from the beginning and was heartbroken for what she was going through.

I do believe that she is also Samatha Cooke’s and also on her YouTube someone said she was also known as Rebecca

Have you seen the stuff in her shop? It's mainly "I want to spend x amount" gift card kinda style things - I'm my eyes that practically, please give me money out of pity

 

[WhatABore]

If she doesn’t have the condition she has been playing the long game with the condition as she has been talking about it and raising awareness of it for 2 years. There isn’t much of a long game you can play with it even with a miracle surely! Then again I always think of that when people pick terminal cancer to fake, surely pick a condition to fake that doesn’t end with your death in a certain time frame!

The thing that made me question her having the condition slightly is that she's constantly repeating that she wasnt in it for the money and no point in counter suing them because she won't see the money. She then mentioned in several videos that she probably won't even make it to the court case.

She only got diagnosed 2/3 years ago and she still seems quite abled in the sense of her speaking and knowing what she's talking about ect. So it doesn't appear, if she does have Huntingtons. Which based on things she's said put her around stage 2.
Which is usually between 3 and 14 years after the start of symptoms. Usually the younger you're diagnosed, the longer it takes. Obviously not always the case.
She keeps talking as if she isn't going to be here in a year or so's time.
She has another 3 stages to go through yet. The last one being end of life care, which that in itself, usually lasts a few years.
From getting symptoms, the average life expectancy on average is 20 years.

Again, obviously there are some occasions where people will go through these stages a lot quicker but she is no further than stage 3 at the most. So to be saying she won't even be around for the court case or for any money seemed a bit odd to me.
There is also no way to know how long it's going to take yet she seemed so certain she wouldn't be here in a year or so

 

[Travel28]

The thing that made me question her having the condition slightly is that she's constantly repeating that she wasnt in it for the money and no point in counter suing them because she won't see the money. She then mentioned in several videos that she probably won't even make it to the court case.

She only got diagnosed 2/3 years ago and she still seems quite abled in the sense of her speaking and knowing what she's talking about ect. So it doesn't appear, if she does have Huntingtons. Which based on things she's said put her around stage 2.
Which is usually between 3 and 14 years after the start of symptoms. Usually the younger you're diagnosed, the longer it takes. Obviously not always the case.
She keeps talking as if she isn't going to be here in a year or so's time.
She has another 3 stages to go through yet. The last one being end of life care, which that in itself, usually lasts a few years.
From getting symptoms, the average life expectancy on average is 20 years.

Again, obviously there are some occasions where people will go through these stages a lot quicker but she is no further than stage 3 at the most. So to be saying she won't even be around for the court case or for any money seemed a bit odd to me.
There is also no way to know how long it's going to take yet she seemed so certain she wouldn't be here in a year or so

Do you think she was going to create a new person at this point or the surgery in America was going to be a miracle?

 

[WhatABore]

Do you think she was going to create a new person at this point or the surgery in America was going to be a miracle?

Possibly. Good point on the new person thing.

I'm wondering if it was a way to convince people more into helping her with all the fees though.

Guilt them into helping a dying person who doesn't have long left.

I'm not sure on the surgery thing. Do we know if that's actually a thing? And if so, I wonder if the person that wrote the article just took her word for it.

Again, she may well have Huntingtons. But if she does, she's not being factual on a lot of things with it.

Usually with trials too, they are usually done on people in the early stages of the disease as the trial is usually not to cure it, but to slow it down.
Again, not always, but especially with Huntingtons, as it breaks down the nerve cells in the brain, it would be a trial, I would imagine, for people in the early stages. So again, she's saying she only has a year or so and she'll be dead.
But if she's on a trial, she must be in the early stages.


I'm rambling now none of it adds up

 

[rupertandbuffy]

I don’t like the ‘investigations’ if she was lying it would come out eventually as there would be no evidence of a trial, if she’s telling the truth it’s lots of people speculating if a disabled woman is lying - which kind of makes me uncomfortable - also the first video I saw was ADHDsheperdess talking about her and she is the last person I’d believe

 

[femmegirly]

I do agree that it’s all a bit unsavoury.

I think it’s obvious that Samantha/Jade/Carrie are all the same person. And that’s all I’ve ever been interested in getting to the bottom of.

I’ve said from the start that just because she has a shady past doesn’t mean that she doesn’t have huntingtons now or that she’s not being sued.

You need to be pretty damn sure to accuse someone of lying about having a terminal illness.

 

[polarbearninja]

It was definitely all going to come out eventually because the lies got more and more far fetched. This is what makes me think she's not a smart con artist who was slowly building up to a Go Fund me.

I think she's a compulsive liar who couldn't help herself with all the attention and possibly has something like Munchausen's. Whether she has Huntington's or not I don't know for sure.

It does seem like the Air BnB thing was a lie that started from a bad review that she invented a story around (if you look at her AirBnB listing and see the review and her response)

 

[pink_norris]

With it all over socials now she does need to be careful there are some right weirdo’s out there determined to find out, she’s still on Airbnb and it wouldn’t be hard to find her address. She’s put in herself in a right situation.

 

[WhatABore]

I've just seen someone's tiktok where she said she has friends at air bnb and they've told her it's a legit case and that they don't understand why air bnb aren't doing anything.

My only thing with this is.. Air bnb are a big company.. And surely anybody and everybody that works for them won't know about the case and probably don't know any more than us? Just because they work for air bnb?

I do agree that it’s all a bit unsavoury.

I think it’s obvious that Samantha/Jade/Carrie are all the same person. And that’s all I’ve ever been interested in getting to the bottom of.

I’ve said from the start that just because she has a shady past doesn’t mean that she doesn’t have huntingtons now or that she’s not being sued.

You need to be pretty damn sure to accuse someone of lying about having a terminal illness.

I just want to clarify that I'm not saying she hasn't got it. I did state further up that she may well have it but not be very clued up on it all.

Just I case that was aimed towards me.

It was more the fact that the things she's said doesn't add up in terms of Huntingtons.

 

[brntxxloz98]

I just think it’s all too convenient that she’s deleted both her TikTok and YouTube channel as these allegations have emerged. Surely if you are at the centre of these kinds of accusations you would want to stand your ground and clear your name? Instead it seems she has just disappeared like Samantha Cookes did in 2013. She’ll probably pop up again in a few years under a new alias. I see a lot of people on TikTok throwing around ableist accusations at anyone who dares say anything against her and saying we are part of the lobby group (lol). It’s got nothing to do with being ableist, even if she weren’t disabled people would want answers to the very concerning information that has come to light. People will believe anything on the internet these days and if you dare speak out, you’re branded a bigot

 

[Insomiaflamingo]

Some people are 100% believing, some are 100% sure she is Samantha, others are on the fence. A tiktoker wheelsnoheels has reached out to air bnb press department for a statement. Hopefully they will issue one and then there will be actual confirmation rather than everyone taking a side

 

[polarbearninja]

I've just seen someone's tiktok where she said she has friends at air bnb and they've told her it's a legit case and that they don't understand why air bnb aren't doing anything.

My only thing with this is.. Air bnb are a big company.. And surely anybody and everybody that works for them won't know about the case and probably don't know any more than us? Just because they work for air bnb

Yeah I think that's bull. No way would a regular Air BnB member of staff know any more about this than us.

 

[pink_norris]

Airbnb are well aware of this case. They have a dedicated Comms teams and complaints team, the case is probably closed and the Comms team strategic view is to say nothing, it was a private matter and nothing to add. She knows this and has run with the story herself

Your noticed in her last chunk of updates she only mentioned the lobby group taking her to court and not Airbnb.

 

[LunaAzul]

Her supporters keep blaming the “lobby group” but then when asked who the lobby group are they have no answer.

It all seems so fishy to me. I think someone on the Reddit thread (or it could have been in here) said there was a typo in the petition wording. Surely her assistive typing wouldn’t make a typo.

Edited to add - I wonder if she was banking on one of her supporters setting up the GFM on her behalf. So she could in future say I never asked for it, it was done for me

 

[brntxxloz98]

I’m hoping we get something in the form of disproving or proving what is truly going on soon. Airbnb are a big company and have received a fair amount of criticism about this and rightly so if it turns out to be true. If it’s not, I’m sure they will want to clear their name and speak out on it in due course