Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Ruth1983

VIP Member
I came here to see if there was any update 😂
Would love to know wth it was all about in the end!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

titan22

VIP Member
It’s weird that there is an 18 year old Olivia Williams born at that time, in that area though, yeah? Did she actually tell us anything that we didn’t know already? How did she know who Tony was? That’s the only thing that jumped out at me. Clinging on to the possibility that I didn’t get completely played…again! 🤣
Yes of course it is. I think there’s a lot of twists and turns in this. Olivia & scribble both brought attention to Cjw/Sam so I don’t understand that aspect.
Whoever they are they are connected someway
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

femmegirly

VIP Member
So the live I was talking about was between two creators who bought off CJW’s website and were supporters of her. Even when the Samantha Cookes thing came out, they were still supportive and emailed her to find out what was going on and got no response so they started to dig a bit more and between them have managed to uncover a timeline of CJW’s various identities. They have been in contact with some relatives and have managed to confirm various things, but the common theme is that none of CJW’s current behaviour has come as a shock to anyone and she has form for this.

In the live they spoke about a few things such as her behaviour when she was an au pair, how she’s been found out in the past etc. one of the creators is the one who got hold of “the notes” (which are now deleted) which were quite dark.

They also have been targeted by the new forest Sara crew for starting a “witch hunt” which they haven’t and have been told by the new forest Sara crew that they shouldn’t be that bothered by it Al because it takes 5 minutes to get a refund from their banks (which it hasn’t) both are out of pocket by hundreds of pounds and want answers and their money back particularly as both are parents of children with special needs and the products promised by Carrie were going to be Christmas presents for their children. Carrie preyed upon them knowing all of this… but the “be kind” crew are saying it’s fine because they will get their money back.

I think they are also bothered by the fact that the shop is still online and you can still buy from it, meaning their is still a chance other people in the same situation could still lose money.

In the live (as in watching and commenting) was also CJWs ex employer, an old school friend, her cousin and an ex neighbour. All of whom were commenting and backing up what was being said.

Edit: as she doesn’t mind being identified, the live was by bangorwreathco - she has done a few videos explaining on the subject which are on her profile.
Is there a reason why you aren’t naming the other creator? I know who it is, but just wondering why the other creators aren’t being named.

What did the cousin say? She’s the only person who I believe is real out of all the friends and family I’ve seen so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

titan22

VIP Member
Does anyone believe that Sam is the mastermind who is into some property scam in a few different countries? I find it find to believe unless she’s got other people helping her. I wonder if her mum & Tony are involved with her scams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

Whattheheck

Active member
Has the Olivia profile posted anything indicating they know/could be anyone related to Samantha at all? I am still assuming it's a troll.
There was an Olivia account yesterday posting a video with the face scribbled over and it was some girl talking but they sounded American. Going on about travel or something. They also posted a picture of a girl - looked like a teenager. I followed the account but it's now gone... the posts made her seem less legit
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

WhatABore

VIP Member
3rd is a spontaneous mutation, but that’s v rare. It’s autosomal dominant so the most likely scenario is inheriting it from a parent who is also affected by the disease, however I’ve read that it’s possible for one to inherit the gene and actually never develop symptoms, so I don’t think her parents not having Huntingtons can be taken as concrete evidence to prove she is lying about having it. Plus, there’s also the possibility of infidelity having occurred as well lol
Yes, exactly.
This is the diagnosis my Sister in laws siblings got.
They carry the gene so can pass it on themselves however they will never develop it themselves.

I couldn't remember the 3rd I was going to say something along the lines of not knowing if you'll develop it or not. But I wasn't 100% sure on that.

Basically what I was trying to say was her parents not having it doesn't really mean anything 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

titan22

VIP Member
I think she just meant her going ‘missing’ and the surrogacy scam.

Olivia’s most recent TikTok with the photos of her in France is where the photo is of her in the white dress. The resemblance is uncanny.

Maybe she has a sister after all! What a twist that would be!
Have you seen her latest TikTok, a family went to Ireland to see the sights and one member asked the host too many questions
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

WhatABore

VIP Member
Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought she said she inherited Huntingtons from one of her parents?

Unsuprisingly there are people not agreeing with New Found Sara, and she’s trying to argue with them instead talking like an adult. Shutting down any comment that says she could be wrong, there is no room for discussion with that woman, it’s her way or the highway. For example apparently the reason why people haven’t got their items is because it’s a ‘4-6 week delivery’ however delivery timescales aren’t mentioned on the 1820things website except to say shipping is ‘as soon as possible.’ 😵‍💫
She will have, if she has it. As they may carry the gene.
As far as I'm aware, it's very very rare to get huntingtons when neither parent carries the gene.
But that parent may never develop symptoms. Only carry the gene.

There’s no way they’d have been told they were only carriers tho? It’s autosomal dominant meaning if you carry the gene by far the most likely scenario is that you develop symptoms.
I'm literally going off what my sister in law and her family have been told.

They have the certain type in their genes (27 to 35 CAG repeats, according to Google)
Which means they won't develop symptoms.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: 2
Ok another mad theory, the dead baby is Olivia. That would make sense. Olivia was registered using sams mums maiden name. It can’t be a coincidence years later sam uses jade Williams
That'd make her about 14. Sounds more like she gave her up for adoption and told people she was stillborn ☹
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I have to say the Geordie is making me laugh😂😂 jam jars at the ready



Yea I’m not really to sure what he meant
They're making some lovely accusations about him and you. This is all strange, who knows who anyone really is but at least we're not just out here calling people onces 😬 that's the last attention I'm paying to any of that bunch

Screenshot_20221030-233301.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
“Our England & Wales Birth, Marriage and Death (BMD) Index collections (1837 - 2005) provide the most complete resource available online. All of these records are completely name searchable. For vital records before 1837, we have the Parish Registers, where you can find UK parish baptism, marriage and burial records.”

Birth records on ancestry only go up to 2005. They have up to date ish records for the electoral register, but of course a baby would not be on one.
Aah thank you. There are some that come up from after 2005 but they seem to be limited, checked it with my mate's 9 year old and she doesn't come up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2