It's a fire I am not willing to lit. As I've said, this involves little children and the improvident actions of their parents, who should know better than to leave a legacy like this.
Lol, but no need, there are much more down to earth ways to navigate their bits and pieces.
That's exactly the strategy she's been frantically working on for weeks. As expected the chosen route is one of distraction and diversion. She's been warned that the mistakes she has made are evident and not easy to cover up, not even by smart accountants or flamboyant "excuses". It was even suggested she would own up to some of it on camera, by stating how inexperienced she was in handeling renovations on this scale and that the bad choices she has made were unfortunate but insurmountable, but as she is convinced she has done nothing wrong this kind of mea culpa (maxima or minima) would always showcase her bad acting skills and fake request for forgiveness, even though I still think she could get away with that too.
But no, instead of being transparant about what really has been going on, she wants to polish up the fact that's she's trying to learn how to keep her books in a way she should have done from the beginning and I'm sure she will be praised for it and some her most doubting patrons probably will be reassured: she made mistakes but is willing to learn from them, so all should be fine.
Personally, what strikes me as the most painful, is her boasting about how she's helping the local community by employing local people. What a load of crap! Building an association and society solely based on donations is entirely irresponsible. She knows this but just does not care.
Last edited: