Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.
You are incorrect there, there are many people who are in prison and will happily sit there. They have no family support, no home, no job and life out of jail doesn't exist for them. They will reoffend once released as they either sit in jail with 3 meals a day, roof over their head, basic medical care or face homelessness.

They pay others do to their dirty work. They wil know who he is in jail, know he has a rich family and what they potentially can earn. The gang corruption in prisons is horrific, they bascially run the joints.
I never said prisoners don’t commit crimes while in jail. I said there’s no proof that Tammy enabled Henri’s abusive behavior by bailing him out and having another family member track Charlotte down so that his friends could attack her. You and others are just moving the goalpost to “oh, another inmate probably helped him,” as a way to keep the suspense going like it’s some kind of gangster movie or something. :rolleyes:

And now that I think about it, the video that ilk just came out with actually sounds like Charlotte told her what happened to the first victim in 2023 and used certain elements of that incident to make it seem like the attack happened to her in 2025. What ilk said in that recent video is almost identical to Charlotte’s alleged “attack” from 3 weeks ago.

It’s starting to make sense to me now that more court facts are painting a clearer picture. I’m like 97% positive that the “attack” that happened 3 weeks ago didn’t happen at all. And the primary motive for the fabricated narrative was to get Tammy cancelled.

It’s definitely going to be an interesting next few weeks… that’s all I have to say.
 
Another TikTok
This is literally fake news. Based on my last post it’s damn near impossible for Henri to have known where Charlotte lived after March 2024, because he hasn’t been released since then.

The TikTok from ilkke claims Henri told a family member about her address which led to a 2025 attack by his friends, but again, that’s not possible. He’s been locked up since she presumably moved. No new arrests or charges have been made.

And if Henri somehow orchestrated this from prison, other inmates wouldn’t risk getting involved, and Henri still wouldn’t have known where Charlotte lived. That’s why whenever anyone asks about Henri’s bail status, ilkke or Charlotte either ignore, delete, or block the comments. And they are probably banking on people not looking it up for themselves because most of Tammy’s fans live in the US and would find it too complicated.
 

kmartplate

VIP Member
"Some of her curated photos"....girl....where have the curves gone that are in every photo? She's easily lost at least 10kg in such as a short period. She has not an inch of fat on her.
Well yes that’s my point, she looks totally different. But her pap photos don’t look bad as stand alone photos with no context.
 
You can not request details of a criminal case from anyone in the District, Magistrates or Supreme Court of QLD.

If this is true, please upload your proof- like you are requiring the victim to do. That seems fair
I definitely will. And I have been calling for Henri to have his own thread but I’m new and can’t make one so I just respond to whatever has already been talked about on here. Not trying to derail the thread at all, was just trying to make a point that since people linked Tammy into it, it’s become an obvious topic of discussion. Hopefully someone can make a new Henri thread though.
 
Appreciate your personal input. Very interesting. Not a job I could handle.

Maybe QLD is different but I looked it up and it's probably for another state and it says what I pasted below. Maybe QLD's crims are more violent and more monitored. Could also be different with every remand centre-

Remandees are unsentenced and are innocent until proven guilty. The law does not regard their confinement as punishment. Therefore, remand prisoners are given maximum flexibility within their security rating and have fewer restrictions placed on them than convicted prisoners. Remand prisoners are treated with the minimum of restrictions that still ensure prisoner safety and good order, security and management of the prison.

Remand prisoners:


  • are held separately from convicted prisoners, when practicable
  • have increased access to visitors and telephone calls to access legal advice and representation
  • have access to legal resources including a legal library
  • are permitted to wear their own clothing if appropriate with their security rating
  • are offered the opportunity (but are not obliged) to work
Yeah… you’re saying things that everyone is aware of. I’ve even said that he would have access to phones, visits, video chats, etc. and I never said that Henri was in solitary confinement 23 hours a day and only allowed outside for one hour lol idk why people are talking around what I’m saying.

THE PROBLEM IS:
His bail was denied in 2024. That means the court already considered him a risk likely due to his criminal history of stalking/intimidation, bail breaches, and violating probation. They would have placed him under strict monitoring.

Maximum-security remand isn’t a loophole for external communication with no oversight. Any suggestion of illegal coordination would trigger an immediate investigation and the accomplices would be jailed. If a family member was involved, they would be easy to identify and find by now. And all police have to do is trace everything back with phone records and CCTV footage. No one would risk jail time just to leak someone’s address, especially if there is no incentive for them to do so and if they did, they’d be charged.

So again, this isn’t about denying what Charlotte has gone through. It’s about asking people to stop spreading accusations against others like Tammy or unnamed “family members” without evidence or legal proceedings to back it up. I’m just calling for due process.
 
It's not your fucking business to be looking for inconsistencies and holes in her statement.
I wasn’t trying to tear anyone down, just offering a voice of reason. There are clear inconsistencies, but I don’t blame Charlotte too much — she’s young and probably naive about the law. She likely thought that this ilkke person on TikTok was helping her. But in reality, ilkke is just using her for clout because she did the same thing with the Anna Paul situation.

Her videos are mainly focused on people attacking Tammy, not supporting Charlotte or the other potential victims involved. Sadly, by listening to her, Charlotte might be putting her own case at risk. It’s obviously a serious matter, and online posts can and do impact a real legal case. I have family in law from police to lawyers and they always tell me this.

From my experience working with DV survivors, the best advice I can give is:
  1. Get legal help first.
  2. Avoid posting about the case online, especially if your abuser/their friends can find you.
  3. Trust the legal process and always keep the prosecutor informed.
I really want to help people, that’s the only reason why I’ve been so critical about all of this. And I feel like my posts have strayed from the underlying issue. If anyone is in a similar situation as Charlotte, here are some resources available in Australia:
  • 1800RESPECT - a free 24/7 national counselling and support service for anyone impacted by DV or SA
  • Women’s Legal Services - provides free legal advice for women facing DV, offering support, resources, and guidance to help navigate the legal system
  • White Ribbon Australia - a movement focusing on men’s violence against women and supporting survivors. Their website offers ways to get involved.
If anyone actually knows Charlotte personally, please relay this to her and let her know not to trust anyone on social media who says they’re an “advocate” unless they’re actually proving good, legally sound advice. She may think that speaking out now will help, but in the long run, it could hurt. 💕
 

Mikahla

Well-known member
No, I know the video Mikahla was talking about. It’s the one I attached to this post and it is Max who ignored Posy. Henri wasn’t there because he was and still is locked up.

I’m not trying to discredit the victim she clearly wants to do that herself so let her… Just don’t sit here claiming Tammy and her family bailed Henri out just for him to track down Charlotte and have his friends attack her, with zero proof. That’s not support, it’s fanfiction.

The uncomfortable truth no one wants to face is that Tammy’s being blamed for something she probably knew nothing about, while her brother’s been in remand for a year. But you ignore that because it doesn’t fit the drama narrative. Blame Henri for his toxic, roid-fueled mess with another juiced-up partner, not Tammy or random people who have nothing to do with it.

I’d have more respect for people like you if you just admitted that you love watching the drama unfold. That’s really what it all boils down to. Praying for and literally preying on the Hembrows downfall and trying to use Henri Thynne to do it……
Okay, so I got it mixed up but there definitely was a video of her with Henri on her sofa. It was on the same day as the photo with him and she was stirring him up because I vividly remember him getting really mad. I can't be the only one to remember this?
 
People can upload photos on different dates. Why are you assuming these posts are in real time? But regardless, Henri was given bail for other crimes.
Because it was real time. These were Charlotte’s Instagram Stories posted on April 1. You can’t edit or add to them once they’ve already been posted and saved.

She said she was attacked 3 days ago (March 29), but in the same Story showed a photo labeled “after 5 days of healing”—which would be from April 3. That doesn’t make sense.

Ilkke’s April 13 video says the attack happened two weeks ago (around March 30), which is close, but still not exact. Also, Henri wasn’t out on bail—he was denied it in 2024 because he breached it 4 times prior to being arrested iand has been in max security prison since.

If you’re making serious claims tied to a legal case, the timeline should at least be consistent.
 

breezie

Member
Off topic but I'm a little concerned with Ava (far left). In recent vids and posts she seems really off like she doesn't want to be there and is forcing a smile.

I do feel like the lifestyle of her sisters has finally caught up and pressured her into a social media presence and to look a certain way. Hopefully I'm wrong and she's just had a few off days but she looks forced. 🤷‍♀️
 

Attachments

notahater1010

VIP Member
Nothing wrong with wearing gym wear, especially if you are actually heading to the gym after drop off. It's how you wear it, not what you wear. And that applies to all clothing and to all people. Common sense.
People will treat you the way you conduct and hold yourself.
There are clothes and clothes, yeah some clothes may be showing too much boobs and they are ok, but others not so much.

I really don’t wanna say that this is a common thing for Aussie girls to be wearing see through clothes and thinking it is normal, but I have seen a lot lately.
If you go on instagram is flooded with girls wearing see through clothes or dresses made of lace and showing the underwear and their butt hanging out. I personally think it screams “look at me”. I mean even on weddings though I saw people wearing clothes similar to the one you posted from Tammy.
It is crazy why the need to have nipples/areolas out for everyone to see.

Unfortunately sometimes being fit and wearing tight gym clothes can be a reason for people who feel inferior to dislike a person.