As if that wasn't always the case. She just hides him because everyone hates him and she knows that. That really has to kill her because she really wanted that marriage to be "goals" in the Instagram world she lives in.A post two hours ago from Tea Time:
------
Literally just saw Matt and Tammy cross the road together (in good spirits). In Melbourne South East x
So journo’s need to just calm down.
Never said it was a gangster movie, nor moving no goal posts. Just know it happens in real life as I deal with prisoners.I never said prisoners don’t commit crimes while in jail. I said there’s no proof that Tammy enabled Henri’s abusive behavior by bailing him out and having another family member track Charlotte down so that his friends could attack her. You and others are just moving the goalpost to “oh, another inmate probably helped him,” as a way to keep the suspense going like it’s some kind of gangster movie or something.
And now that I think about it, the video that ilk just came out with actually sounds like Charlotte told her what happened to the first victim in 2023 and used certain elements of that incident to make it seem like the attack happened to her in 2025. What ilk said in that recent video is almost identical to Charlotte’s alleged “attack” from 3 weeks ago.
It’s starting to make sense to me now that more court facts are painting a clearer picture. I’m like 97% positive that the “attack” that happened 3 weeks ago didn’t happen at all. And the primary motive for the fabricated narrative was to get Tammy cancelled.
It’s definitely going to be an interesting next few weeks… that’s all I have to say.
Congrats. I’m glad you’re getting a fulfilling experience dealing with prisoners. For the billionth time… I never said prisoners never do bad things.Never said it was a gangster movie, nor moving no goal posts. Just know it happens in real life as I deal with prisoners.
I am really interested in why you are so passionate/obsessed about this particular case? If you have so much information and putting in the hard dicktective work, maybe you should go to the QLD police and put all your evidence to them? Are you a friend of theirs? family? Without outing yourself, whats the attraction?
Tammy isn't that dumb to be involved or complicit in her brothers criminal activities, no one has said that she is. Also, show us the receipts of where you have got these court documents from? A link, a screenshot?
" I’M SAYING that there’s no actual evidence (police reports, medical records, local news reports) that Henri orchestrated an attack from jail"Congrats. I’m glad you’re getting a fulfilling experience dealing with prisoners. For the billionth time… I never said prisoners never do bad things.
I’M SAYING that there’s no actual evidence (police reports, medical records, local news reports) that Henri orchestrated an attack from jail, and trying to connect that to Tammy without proof is reckless. The story keeps changing to keep her in the crosshairs, and that’s the issue.
I’m passionate because I care about due process and I’ve seen too many online pile-ons destroy people’s reputations without facts. That doesn’t mean I’m their friend or family.
I’m “putting in the hard dicktective work” (great term, by the way) because some of you are running with whatever fits your hate-boner for Tammy, and yeah I think it’s worth calling out when that turns into misinformation. People are turning into rabid dogs, foaming at the mouth to find a way to drag her in when no one else in the family is being held to the same standard. That doesn’t seem odd to you?
Whenever the Henri thread gets made I’ll post whatever I find from the court docs over there.
Because there’s not. Go argue with your reflection, not me." I’M SAYING that there’s no actual evidence (police reports, medical records, local news reports) that Henri orchestrated an attack from jail"
How do you know that? What an odd statement.
I begAnybody have any luck with moving the Wentworth chat to another thread?
She's getting slammed in the comments for having a toxic ingredient in all of the line but especially this gut health one because Maltodextrin is a cause of inflammation in the gut. It upsets the balance of gut bacteria. Never trust an influencer with your health.Yes that's what your shilling.. "gut health"
Do not take this particular thread as an opportunity to insult Selfish Supps. Please do the research. From what I’ve been able to gather, Tammy, Amy, and Emilee have been very misleading on the actual supplement information. So we’ve been blocked from releasing the actual link. You’ll have to search for it yourself. Soz!
Now!? The whole time.Are you talking to yourself now?
Girl you are obsessed. This is a Tammy hembrow thread, I'm off for a couple of days and I have to go through pages of nonsense regarding her brother. Can you stop hijacking this thread ?MY COMMENTARY PROVIDE BELOW HAS BEEN CONFIRMED FROM BRISBANE MAGISTRATE COURT *the following is NOT a statement from the Brisbane Magistrate Court, but my own statement that is based on what I was able to find from requesting said information about Henri Thynne’s Court Case:
Some of Henri Thynne’s case has been transferred to the Brisbane District Court due to the severity of the more serious charges (such as his strangulation charge he received in 2024).
Once the judge refused bail on the serious counts, it overrode everything else: even the charges that normally qualify for bail release can’t “spring” him to get bailed out, because bail is decided globally, not one‑by‑one.
IF THE ACCUSED FACES A MIXTURE OF CHARGES, bail is considered globally. Because bail was refused at the District Court level, any accompanying lesser charges are effectively overridden AND he stays remanded on the most serious count, which has been found to be accurate based on Daily Mail’s reporting.
Bottom line: In Queensland, a denied‑bail decision on a single domestic‑violence charge keeps an accused behind bars, no matter how minor the secondary counts might be. Under Queensland’s Bail Act, bail hinges on the toughest charge in the bundle—not the easy ones.
Henri faces at least one “show‑cause” DV that was proven indictable, which is why his case just went up to the Brisbane District Court. Once the judge refused bail on that serious count, it overrode everything else: even charges that normally qualify for bail.
In Queensland bail law, a “show‑cause” offence is one so serious that the usual presumption of “innocent until proven guilty, so bail is allowed” flips the other way.
For these charges, the judge starts with “bail is refused.” Then, the accused must show cause—give exceptional reasons—why they should be released (e.g., key evidence has collapsed, critical health issues, or other truly compelling circumstances). If they can’t meet that high bar, they stay in custody until trial.
No. I couldn’t go back and edit so I was trying to add to my original post lol.Are you talking to yourself now?
It’s a Tammy Hembrow thread, yet people still talk about Matt Poole, Reece, Reece’s former roommate, her sisters, etc. I wasn’t the one who first mentioned her brother. I was just commenting on it. Not sure why that’s considered “hijacking” but sure, you got it.Girl you are obsessed. This is a Tammy hembrow thread, I'm off for a couple of days and I have to go through pages of nonsense regarding her brother. Can you stop hijacking this thread ?