I’m not sure if it is a legal possibility in his jurisdiction but I thought it was plausible that Andrew could have slapped an injunction on her to remove the explicit photo of the baby under parental rights, perhaps on the grounds that it was exploitative of Pixie and he was not consulted before she posted it as the father. If that’s a possibility I could see where, perhaps, whatever legal justification he would have it might expand to her posting other photos regarding a funeral or what have you. Anything that might be considered exploitative. And perhaps she’s not talking about it much because she doesn’t want to step into that gray area.
I completely agree with you, I think she’s also not talking about it because she doesn’t wanna get caught out for lying. Especially if she has been reading here and has seen how we have reconstructed an entire criminal timeline going back to her date of conception

She would be smart to think that she doesn’t want to add any more fuel to the fire in regards to the sleuthing that we do here to connect the dots. The only thing we don’t have is the corkboard with the red strings