This would explain all the crap over IG lately about her being the main revenue stream in the house
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Oh huzzah! Well that’s a win then isn’t it. Doubt he cares, he doesn’t seem the type. Probably just makes him realise they’ve made the right decision by separating. She wanted the membership to provide a safe space, not a place to be seen and feel part of the exclusive monied crowd, don’t you knowThat is one of the most vapid articles I’ve ever read!
View attachment 3379713
This is photoshopped to all hell. Doesn’t look like her at all!
And then it just goes on and on and ON about the private members club
View attachment 3379717
View attachment 3379718
View attachment 3379719
so relatableHas anyone read her piece in The Times about splitting from her husband? Apparently it’s all been a breeze and her only concern is who gets the soho house membership
Give it a few months and one of them will be in a relationship. It won’t be so amicable then. That’s the way it always goes.
At least it will give Molly a new angle for her vapid witterings and more money from The Times.
At least it will give Molly a new angle for her vapid witterings and more money from The Times.
It will be him and she will be absolutely furious.
It all seems a bit crass doesn’t it? At the centre of this divorce are three young kids navigating parental separation and lots of change and upset, do they really need to be walking past the cover of the Times at their local newsagent seeing how mummy is monetising their private heartache? Selfish Mother by name, selfish mother by nature.
Not to mention how jarring it must be to see your mum photoshopped to that extreme, waistline cinched and complexion ironed. What a confusing time for them!
Not to mention how jarring it must be to see your mum photoshopped to that extreme, waistline cinched and complexion ironed. What a confusing time for them!
She will do a motherpukka and have a new baby for some content!
I’d be surprised. She is very much SELFISH MOTHER.
I read her ‘article’ in the Times. No one likes Mondays.
Geez in my house between my husband groaning and my neurodiverse kid refusing to go to school it’s safe to say Monday mornings are a tit show,
Fobbing your kids on to your soon to be ex so that you don’t have to deal with them speaks volumes
She’s announced the course.
What a massive shock.
What a massive shock.
Is it an article out divorce or an advert for the club ? Wtaf. Entitled twit
Children of divorce are ALWAYS harmed. Of course there are many situations where children are better off in separate households but it’s too complex for them to process at that point they just see mum & dad splitting up. So to be talking about access to babington house when her children’s mental health should be paramount (and is probably in tatters) is beyond crass. It’s egotistical, SELFISH and just bloody rotten. I just cannot understand who does she think relates to this? It paints marriage and divorce as trivial and funny. What a bleeping bellend.
Trained journalists would give their souls for a byline in the Times and that kind of exposure and yet there she is filling up column inches talking about who gets the Babington House membership post divorce. She could have used that space to do some good, sign post to useful resources, talk about how the children have been affected, or what they have done to mitigate their upset. However she has made it all about her own selfish needs. Never was a company name so prophetic.
She turned off shipping to the UK for her online store… “I wondered why I hadn’t any orders” queue tour of site… call me a cynic but either it didn’t happen and she thinks it’s a great marketing strategy (it’s not) or she did which is an even worse marketing strategy!
also asking for help cleaning her screen isn’t one of her hustles creating Instagram content - how is she employed by brands
also asking for help cleaning her screen isn’t one of her hustles creating Instagram content - how is she employed by brands
Jesus. She’s insufferable. Sounds like she wants to marry Babington House.
These tragic reels. She’s in her mid 40s right? Why does she come across so much older?
She must be around 47. I googled to check her age (god, there can’t be a paper in Britain she hasn’t touted some self-indulgent to) and these two articles tell a story…
"i regret posting my kids pics on Instagram to 50k followers."
She regretted it so much she wrote about it for the Mail online with one of the largest online readerships and included pics of the kids.
She regretted it so much she wrote about it for the Mail online with one of the largest online readerships and included pics of the kids.
She isn’t stopping for any other reason than she’s not relevant anymore
or her divorce terms tell her she can’t share them anymore