Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Emsie

VIP Member
I don't need to tell you guys but I'm definitely not buying the whole "oh when I look back at it now, yeah it was wrong". As a new parent you see danger everywhere all of a sudden. Can't do this, you might bang your head, you turn your house into soft play once they start moving about. There isn't a chance in hell you would spin a baby that fast as anyone, but especially not a new parent. Not only is he pdf he's also an extremely cruel and spiteful man.

ETA when you adopt a child, the social workers are extremely forceful in pushing therapeutic parenting. It's gentle parenting on crack. Responsive parenting. No cry it out, Playful, Acceptance, Curiousity and Empathy are what you are supposed to lead with - it's incredibly hard when you've not parented or been parented that way. So I don't buy all of the "he needed to play by himself" crap either.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 43

Mysteryy

VIP Member
The fact that we are all struggling to picture how he could be suspended over the cot bars tells you exactly how unnatural a position it is and how unlikely it would have been for him to get into himself
 
  • Like
Reactions: 43

kabukigirl

Chatty Member
One thing I thought when reading all the dna testing posts earlier, where there were mixed sexual DNA found on various things -which they say could be transferred because they are in a domestic setting - was like, I don’t know about you guys, but there would not be loads of my husbands sexual DNA on things around our house - not even in the dirty laundry basket to transfer onto any of our children’s clothes 🤢 They sound like a right dirty pair of tickets, in their jizzy house, and not “clean freaks” like they claim 🤮
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Sick
  • Heart
Reactions: 42

hilarity1259

New member
Look how thriving he was with his foster carers. Utterly heartbreaking. That beautiful innocent face has touched so many hearts.

IMG_2764.jpeg
 
  • Heart
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 42

Mycatismad

VIP Member
I honestly also feel like there’s probably nothing natural or normal about the videos they made of Preston touching his own parts either. In isolation, yes, children do that at times. In this case I think it is FAR likelier it’s learnt behaviour and that we’d all agree it was not typical for such a young baby if we were the unfortunate members of the jury 💔
Having been around multiple baby boys in the family for the past 18 years, imo that is very young to even really notice their own willy and usually they do not touch it in a way that results in what JV found so “hilarious”, I honestly barely recall anything remotely like what is being described that somehow in this case has been filmed several times. I don’t believe in coincidences.
Extremely harrowing 😓
And saying he has a ‘stiffy’ disgusting bastards, who speaks about a little baby like that?! It makes me sick.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Sad
Reactions: 42

Shinythings

VIP Member
It also strikes me as someone who was meant to be safeguarding trained, he would know what sort of photos he shouldn't be taking and sending to ANYONE and what it means legally if it's innocent as he claimed. It's drummed into you at safeguarding training that even innocent pictures of your baby of genitals are showing is a huge no no and is regarded as making and sharing indecent images. He has no excuse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 42

Cosytidy

Chatty Member
Because he has no understanding about normal behaviour around a baby JMF won’t appreciate how concerning it sounds the amount of time Preston was naked. No sane person puts a baby naked in a cot, nor lets them be naked while eating food. All this ‘exploring’ food & his body is leakage of his sexualisation of Preston.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 42

pixieroo

Chatty Member
Mr Wright asks about injuries to Preston's head, torso, mouth and lip

Mr Wright asks about the injuries to the head, torso, mouth and lip, of which Dr Armour and Dr Gifford expressed opinions in terms of the mechanism by which they were caused.
T
hese experts expressed the view that these were inconsistent with resuscitation.

Prof Crane says they may have been consistent with attempts at resuscitation and forceful gripping during this process. He says they are consistent with fingertip bruising which ‘could’ be caused by prodding or gripping.

Mr Wright asks: “Are they consistent with Preston being subjected, shortly before his death, to the forceful taking hold of his head, arm, upper body and insertion of a hard, smooth object deep into his throat?”


Prof Crane says: “Yes.”

The witness says there was a bruise to the baby’s bladder. It may be explained by compression of the bladder against the spine but Prof Crane agrees it is a ‘most unusual injury’.

This just makes me incredibly sad. Whilst we all know how it's alleged the injuries were caused, seeing it written there in a little more detail that previously reported just stopped me short. I'm not sure why this is the bit that did that - out of all the other parts - but I'm trying to take from it that Mr Wright KC is doing a good job in laying it all out, as difficult as it is.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 42

MavisBeacon

VIP Member
Catching up on the new podcast episode - there's no world in which your child dies, you've filmed them having a horrific "seizure" earlier that afternoon when they're clearly struggling to breathe, the pathologist says they suffocated, and you forget to mention it at all at any point in the subsequent months as both you, your partner and the police are searching for answers.
Yeah, right.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 41

MmmB777

VIP Member
Uh oh. He’s obviously said he heard Preston banging his buckets whilst he was out blow drying..nope.. towel drying his hair and yet the buckets were found stacked on the side.
He’s said why does it matter. lol. Fucking idiot.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: 41

Spidey2020

VIP Member
I wonder if some of the ED visits were red herrings. Where they took him even though he recovered or they knew he was ok but it helped create the image of them being ‘worried new parents’ who were overly cautious and inexperienced.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Wow
Reactions: 41
That article about the dark web and the nurse being charged with neglect was the biggest load of shit I’ve ever read in my entire life. So stupid to do it too
As it could have derailed the trial.

imagine being such a pussy you need to make up a fake article about a real baby who actually suffered abuse and died, just to get attention and likes and shares.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 41

MmmB777

VIP Member
They would have seen if there was an injury to his bottom. When my children were babies the first thing I did in the morning upon us waking is change their nappies, the fact he’s saying he didn’t change it before taking Preston to JV’s mum is ridiculous and his way of squirming out of it. He knows what he did.
Yes doesn’t fit with the super daddies narrative does it. Leaving a baby all night and morning in the same nappy cos they are clean freaks 🤥🤥
Can’t wait for the nasty JV from his police interviews to come out.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 41

pixieroo

Chatty Member
Mr Varley says: "I never expected years down the line having to be that accurate."

I'm thinking the snarky attitude is coming out now as he's being tied in knots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 41

Amydior1947

Well-known member
I haven’t commented on this thread before, but have been watching. I am particularly interested in child protection.

What I’m about to say sounds like the anti - woke “I’m not racist but..” tribe.

However, I do believe amongst educated professionals there is potentially dangerous bias for certain minority groups. I don’t doubt for a second that gay dads were seen as lower risk, and it probably helped the local authorities diversity criteria.

Please don’t think in anyway I am saying members of the lgbtqia+ community are criminals by default. However, inevitably there will be a small few who are criminals etc. and this may be over looked due to not wanting to come across un-pc.

I say this because my daughter was abused by a trans young man at college, and he definitely wasn’t treated in the same way you’d expect a cis young man to be.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Heart
Reactions: 40

Ray_of_Sunshine

VIP Member
One thing I thought when reading all the dna testing posts earlier, where there were mixed sexual DNA found on various things -which they say could be transferred because they are in a domestic setting - was like, I don’t know about you guys, but there would not be loads of my husbands sexual DNA on things around our house - not even in the dirty laundry basket to transfer onto any of our children’s clothes 🤢 They sound like a right dirty pair of tickets, in their jizzy house, and not “clean freaks” like they claim 🤮
It’s so disgusting isn’t it! Someone said yesterday the dog was running around with the sex toys in its mouth and that’s how Preston came into contact with them 🤢 Along with the semen everywhere why are these things not kept completely separate from the rest of the household? Pair of fucking perverts.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 39

Hyacinthsquash

VIP Member
What a beautiful little soul. The only relief is that he spent the most part of his life with his wonderful foster mum who showed him love, compassion and care. I do hope they take into consideration that he never had any ‘seizures’ etc when he was in her care..
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39

Liverbird2003

VIP Member
I don't think anyone meant Preston was better off dead, than being removed from those 2 evil bastards and being placed in a safe, loving home.
I took it as he was now safe from a lifetime of sexual abuse.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39