Michael Jackson

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Generally, when discussing childhood sex abuse, I'm not really inclined to get up and dance, no matter how great the beat is.

Being in a court of law, trying a man for abusing children... I guess that's only fun of the pedalo provides a banging soundtrack.

If you're reading some of the replies in this thread and scratching your heads, remember that people just like that have children, and some will go to great lengths to touch money and fame. If you're wondering how children wound up in bed with MJ, and where were their parents, how could they let this happen?

Very easy to turn your back on the behavior of the King of Pop if you're that damn pathetic. Hell, that Last Prophets creep had women offering him their infants and I'd never even heard of that band before he was busted.

Every corner of the globe knew Micheal Jackson and adored him.

Now, imagine all the things that sick duck got to do when visiting other countries.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 16
surely the trial shouldnt have been allowed then
this is what google said when i asked if a celeb in trial should have jurys who like their music acting etc

Legally, no; a celebrity should not have a jury composed of people who like them. The goal of a jury trial is to provide an impartial trier of fact, and having a jury packed with fans would create an inherent bias that undermines the core principles of the justice system
They asked potential jurors if they were fans and many either said they weren't or they could be impartial which clearly wasn't true. It happens more than people realise. Everybody wanted a part of the trial, even non fans so it's not a surprise his actual fans were willing to lie so they could be close to him even with what it was.


Generally, when discussing childhood sex abuse, I'm not really inclined to get up and dance, no matter how great the beat is.

Being in a court of law, trying a man for abusing children... I guess that's only fun of the pedalo provides a banging soundtrack.

If you're reading some of the replies in this thread and scratching your heads, remember that people just like that have children, and some will go to great lengths to touch money and fame. If you're wondering how children wound up in bed with MJ, and where were their parents, how could they let this happen?

Very easy to turn your back on the behavior of the King of Pop if you're that damn pathetic. Hell, that Last Prophets creep had women offering him their infants and I'd never even heard of that band before he was busted.

Every corner of the globe knew Micheal Jackson and adored him.

Now, imagine all the things that sick duck got to do when visiting other countries.
BIB - There is a well known UK singer who has had a lot of accusations thrown at him over the years and even had his home raided but they found nothing. He played the victim and many believed he was innocent but the rumour is after he got his fingers burnt years ago, he stopped shitting in his back yard and only did it in places he knew he could get away with it...countries where there were lots of poor people who he could throw money at to turn the other way. A few people have come forward saying he abused them when they were kids but it was ignored and anytime something turned up online, it was quickly deleted because he was part of a wider circle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 10
They asked potential jurors if they were fans and many either said they weren't or they could be impartial which clearly wasn't true. It happens more than people realise.
Another reason celebrity worship she be scorned by society. People are way too willing to protect the stars they love out of some warped and misplaced loyalties. It happens at all levels of criminal investigation, prosection, and even in family services departments. The wrong fan gets hold of a case and purposefully lets a monster off as easily as they can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
They asked potential jurors if they were fans and many either said they weren't or they could be impartial which clearly wasn't true. It happens more than people realise. Everybody wanted a part of the trial, even non fans so it's not a surprise his actual fans were willing to lie so they could be close to him even with what it was.




BIB - There is a well known UK singer who has had a lot of accusations thrown at him over the years and even had his home raided but they found nothing. He played the victim and many believed he was innocent but the rumour is after he got his fingers burnt years ago, he stopped shitting in his back yard and only did it in places he knew he could get away with it...countries where there were lots of poor people who he could throw money at to turn the other way. A few people have come forward saying he abused them when they were kids but it was ignored and anytime something turned up online, it was quickly deleted because he was part of a wider circle.
Is the singer a bachelor boy? Trying to think who it could be and that's the one which springs to mind having been raided?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Finally saw Michael, which is a fantastic film and really made me remember how exciting and wonderful and sweet his public persona was. I wound up feeling really angry at him, because he was someone truly special and had to go ruin it all by being a predator.

And yes, I know the whole thing's a puff piece to begin with, but damn I remember watching some of that stuff when it happened and being that excited. The Grammies moonwalk moment for instance, hell I remember talking about that on the playground afterwards!

Shame it all went down the way it did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I whole heartedly believe he was guilty. The cognitive dissonance from fans astounds me and I constantly feel like banging my head against a wall in comment sections that defend poor little never had a childhood himself Michael 🥺

If, and this is massive bleeping if I dont for a second believe, he was innocent hes STILL guilty of creating confusing barriers and boundaries for children. Even if he didnt commit sexual abuse, those children would have a warped view of what is acceptable in regards to sharing space with a grown adult you arent related to. Making them susceptible to (further) abuse from others.

I think he was a massive pos though and believe if he was alive today I actually think he'd have less defenders.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
I whole heartedly believe he was guilty. The cognitive dissonance from fans astounds me and I constantly feel like banging my head against a wall in comment sections that defend poor little never had a childhood himself Michael 🥺

If, and this is massive bleeping if I dont for a second believe, he was innocent hes STILL guilty of creating confusing barriers and boundaries for children. Even if he didnt commit sexual abuse, those children would have a warped view of what is acceptable in regards to sharing space with a grown adult you arent related to. Making them susceptible to (further) abuse from others.

I think he was a massive pos though and believe if he was alive today I actually think he'd have less defenders.
He didn't have a childhood....that is something I don't get as an excuse because there are millions who went through the same or worse who didn't grow up to do what he did. It's as bad as the 'he was still a child/asexual' excuses when there is tons of evidence he was far from it. There are videos of him lusting after women and people talking about buying him porn etc which proves it was bull. Of course they then use that as an other excuse to proof his innocense like there havent't been countless instances of straight men married for years with kids being caught with CSAM containing just boys.


BIB - it's the saint effect that happens to everyone when they die. Diana is the perfect example. When she was alive she could be a right nasty cow. Even friends said she could be really vindictive yet the minute she died, people forgot she had flaws and could be nippy and decided she was a saint who was too good for us idiots. There are people out there who think the likes of Bundy, Dahmer and other serial killers were poor guys who just weren't treated right....it's mad but it happens.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 9
He didn't have a childhood....that is something I don't get as an excuse because there are millions who went through the same or worse who didn't grow up to do what he did. It's as bad as the 'he was still a child/asexual' excuses when there is tons of evidence he was far from it. There are videos of him lusting after women and people talking about buying him porn etc which proves it was bull. Of course they then use that as an other excuse to proof his innocense like there havent't been countless instances of straight men married for years with kids being caught with CSAM containing just boys.


BIB - it's the saint effect that happens to everyone when they die. Diana is the perfect example. When she was alive she could be a right nasty cow. Even friends said she could be really vindictive yet the minute she died, people forgot she had flaws and could be nippy and decided she was a saint who was too good for us idiots. There are people out there who think the likes of Bundy, Dahmer and other serial killers were poor guys who just weren't treated right....it's mad but it happens.
jade goody too
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
He didn't have a childhood....that is something I don't get as an excuse because there are millions who went through the same or worse who didn't grow up to do what he did. It's as bad as the 'he was still a child/asexual' excuses when there is tons of evidence he was far from it. There are videos of him lusting after women and people talking about buying him porn etc which proves it was bull. Of course they then use that as an other excuse to proof his innocense like there havent't been countless instances of straight men married for years with kids being caught with CSAM containing just boys.


BIB - it's the saint effect that happens to everyone when they die. Diana is the perfect example. When she was alive she could be a right nasty cow. Even friends said she could be really vindictive yet the minute she died, people forgot she had flaws and could be nippy and decided she was a saint who was too good for us idiots. There are people out there who think the likes of Bundy, Dahmer and other serial killers were poor guys who just weren't treated right....it's mad but it happens.
Totally agree with everything you've wrote! Even down to the stuff about Diana, I dont think of her as the saint the world seems to either 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Totally agree with everything you've wrote! Even down to the stuff about Diana, I dont think of her as the saint the world seems to either 🤣
What really annoys me is she was always portrayed as the victim, hamming it up in interviews like when said 'There were three of us in the marriage' when she hereself was the other woman to several married men when married to Charles and after they divorced with a few wives/girlfriends calling her out on it. Dodi also had a girlfriend when she got with him, something a lot of people forget as well as the fact that she was giving interviews hinting about marriage when even friends said it was for attention and would have got bored with him pretty soon and was only using him to piss off people. There is no denying she did do a lot of good things but there are still far too many people who have rose tinted glasses where she is concerned, same as with Michael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7