So this thread is dead but I've just seen this Daily Mail article on these two. I like them as a couple generally i think and I don't even think they look like they're having an argument in these pics. Everyone in the comments also agrees the pics look like a non story. But don't people usually say that when the Mail does an article like this it's hinting at something they can't publish?
I find it hypocritical that they share their kids so much on social media and articles (pictures and/or anecdotes) but act morally superior by not sharing their faces. I don't want to see their faces but it would be better not to invade their privacy at all.
It's fairly obvious they do it for the family influencer publicity and perks (a la the Fletchers and Judds).
So this thread is dead but I've just seen this Daily Mail article on these two. I like them as a couple generally i think and I don't even think they look like they're having an argument in these pics. Everyone in the comments also agrees the pics look like a non story. But don't people usually say that when the Mail does an article like this it's hinting at something they can't publish?
I saw this and thought they were just chatting.
My thought was that it was an excuse to publish pictures of Emma not looking as glam and polished as she usually does.