Sometimes I have wondered to myself, does she even know who Erdogan is & what he has done with his regime to Turkey in past 20 or so years?Big hit to turkey today.
Perhaps property there isn't such a good investment.
His skin regime on tiktok?Sometimes I have wondered to myself, does she even know who Erdogan is & what he has done with his regime to Turkey in past 20 or so years?
Skincare regime/Authoritarian regime it's all the same for Kneevo, as long as she can buy a cheap apartment & some cheap plastic surgery to go along with it.His skin regime on tiktok?
That is now illegal in Ireland. Please research 'CoCos law'. It is considered 'image based sexual abuse' to repost somebody's only fans content on other platforms.Is there any way to see what she posts on OF without subscribing? There’s bound to be screenshots no?
What a load of rubbish that law is ... 5000 people pay to see nudes that's fine... But those who don't pay are supposedly "sexually abusing " her.That is now illegal in Ireland. Please research 'CoCos law'. It is considered 'image based sexual abuse' to repost somebody's only fans content on other platforms.
If you want a general preview go to get twitter I'd say
Not everyone is a huge account like Kneevo, plenty of people have a small amount of subs on OnlyFans and it’s shitty when their pics get spread across sites like the Fappening, being spread in group chats, and anyone gets their hands on them and you’ve got malicious people sending them to family, work etc on purpose. And yes that’s the risk people take having any photos online but that’s not the point.What a load of rubbish that law is ... 5000 people pay to see nudes that's fine... But those who don't pay are supposedly "sexually abusing " her.
In reality, The only thing that would be violated is her copyright
Ah lads stop. Jesus wept. What are they like?What’s with kneevo, Miriam and the child going live with the girl who was in the car chase with the guards giving her publicly and praising her!!
Malice (i.e. meaning to cause harm) isn't a constituent element of the offence. It is enough for the Guards to prove that a person sharing the images was "reckless as to harm". This will be easy to prove in the case of an ex sharing private nudes, but it's a completely different kettle of fish for the sharing of freely available OF content. There is no legitimate expectation of privacy for that content.Apparently it’s going to be virtually impossible to prove that someone was sharing a pic to be malicious which is mad to me because 90% of the time that’s what’s happening especially if they’re being purposely sent to the wrong people to humiliate the person but there you go.
And how does that work with images sent in DMs, regardless of price? Joe signs up to Jane’s OnlyFans, Jane sells him a nude photo in DMs and only him (not everyone has explicit content on their page remember) Joe finds Jane’s family/employer sends the photos to them, or posts them publicly somewhere with the sole intent of humiliating her. If Jane proves she only sold it to one person, where does that leave her?Reposting OF content is not covered by CoCo's law, despite what Niamh or any other OF girls might like to say on Twitter and Insta.
The Act specifies that the "harm" must come from an interference with "peace or privacy". The images on OF are not private intimate images, they are commodities that Niamh is happy for everyone in the world to see if they will pay her the princely sum of €3.
I believe the Guards have already said that they won't be prosecuting OF leaks, and if they do, any competent solicitor will get the person off.
Malice (i.e. meaning to cause harm) isn't a constituent element of the offence. It is enough for the Guards to prove that a person sharing the images was "reckless as to harm". This will be easy to prove in the case of an ex sharing private nudes, but it's a completely different kettle of fish for the sharing of freely available OF content. There is no legitimate expectation of privacy for that content.
Totally off topic but the Jane/ John scenario is giving me horrific flashbacks to MCQ's i had to do for bleedin insurance examsAnd how does that work with images sent in DMs, regardless of price? Joe signs up to Jane’s OnlyFans, Jane sells him a nude photo in DMs and only him (not everyone has explicit content on their page remember) Joe finds Jane’s family/employer sends the photos to them, or posts them publicly somewhere with the sole intent of humiliating her. If Jane proves she only sold it to one person, where does that leave her?
Hahaha stop you’re insurance as well?Totally off topic but the Jane/ John scenario is giving me horrific flashbacks to MCQ's i had to do for bleedin insurance exams
I know yeah, one of her "besties" is a 16 year old child.. She might have lots of money, but her social life isn't exactly hopping with the company (or lack of) she keepsIs kneevo actually giving out about adults commenting on the childs behaviour, calling them weirdos or as she spells it wierd? hahaha whats even weirder is the fact that she, a 24 year old, is 'besties' with the child! The stupidity that this one displays daily is hard to comprehend!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?