Bet he's pissed about this "breaking the internet".........
Oh yeah for sure Stronger is one of my favourite songsThe two of them are boring. I've seen enough of her to last me a lifetime. Like she's his wife? That's it. The most googled woman tit he's going on about isn't the big flex he thinks it is. No one cares about the grammys either anyway. I loved kanye back in the day. I wish he could just make music like he used to. Remember when kim broke the Internet. Now looking back no one cares. People still care about his music though.
So open minded your brains have fallen out.Im in the minority here I guess. I actually feel like this was a wonderful and thought-provoking exercise. The west claims to be liberated, that a woman is in control of her body and that what a woman wears bears NO impact on how she should be judged or treated by men. And yet look at this… a beautiful woman (with a figure that is just art itself) is being criticised by men and women alike. People calling for her to be locked up and arrested. Guess the west isn’t as “free” as it tells other cultures it is.
Also I think they both collaborate on her clothing. No doubt he’s involved because he always has been and maybe he’s a fool but I think she’s very much got a say and enjoys the statements she is able to make.
An anonymous submission - it must be true!
I knew he was a "socks on in bed" kind of guy! I wasn't expecting them to be over the knees though...
There weren’t any children there?An anonymous submission - it must be true!
Seriously though, while I don’t understand why she would voluntarily do what she’s doing, I hate the misogynistic discourse surrounding it. Just because she’s a woman, doesn’t mean she doesn’t have freaky kinks. Just because she’s a woman, doesn’t mean that she’s not getting off on it. Women love sex, nudity and weird tit too. However, by that logic she is solely on the hook for exposing herself to children. Coercion or no coercion, she exposed herself knowingly in front of children. She should get done for indecent exposure.
There were plenty of children at the event. It’s not an adult event. I don’t know why you think that?Well if that’s real that’s some random kid who she can’t possibly have known about or expected to be present.
It was an adult event- it was a grim stunt but going on about her exposing herself to children as if she’s a paedophile is ridiculous
Nobody is ‘wailing’ about the children.I think it is what it is and there is not need to try and dramatise it more by being all WON’T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN <wail>
I cansee why the police / judicial system aren’t interested in reacting and why calling it indecent exposure doesn’t add any power to the discussion. It’s a conversation with subtleties and nuance and that’s what’s so interesting/ morbidly fascinating about it.
Yeah what exactly are these subtleties and nuance that make it irrelevant to talk about indecent exposure?I think it is what it is and there is not need to try and dramatise it more by being all WON’T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN <wail>
I cansee why the police / judicial system aren’t interested in reacting and why calling it indecent exposure doesn’t add any power to the discussion. It’s a conversation with subtleties and nuance and that’s what’s so interesting/ morbidly fascinating about it.
Agreed! And anyone unsolicitedly exposing themselves like that at a respected awards event is a wrong un… Kids there or notThere were plenty of children at the event. It’s not an adult event. I don’t know why you think that?
Anyone exposing themselves knowing that there are children a few metres away is a wrong ‘un.
Wow.Off his meds.An extraordinary Twitter rant going on right now. He's cancelling himself for good, the psycho