Johnny Depp & Amber Heard #29

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
He acted the French film Jeanne Du Barry; Directed Modi-Three Days On the Wings of Madness and is starring in Day Drinker (still in production)....since the trial ....and has toured with the Hollywood Vampires
He is also featured in a Tim Burton Documentary and a Hollywood vampire documentary, which are still awaiting release.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 4
He acted the French film Jeanne Du Barry; Directed Modi-Three Days On the Wings of Madness and is starring in Day Drinker (still in production)....since the trial ....and has toured with the Hollywood Vampires
Thanks. Day Drinker. I can't think what that's about 😂
 
There's another upcoming film ; The Carnival at the end of days (2026)
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 2
He is now doing some with Ridley Scott where he is creating a character for a graphic novel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
'Cara Delevingne has finally confirmed she was romantically involved with Amber Heard at the height of the Aquaman star's divorce from Johnny Depp.'

Ms Delevingne, 33, has confirmed that she and Ms Heard became 'entangled' when she went through her messy divorce from Depp in 2016, and said the Pirates Of The Caribbean star was 'driven crazy by jealousy'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Also from the same article

“ It's because we did a movie together, and it was called London Fields.

'He was also doing the movie. I think he was pretty driven crazy by jealousy. Nothing was happening at that point. Later, after they divorced, it had, I suppose.”

And

“ Referring to Amber's liaisons with X founder Elon Musk, Ms Delevingne noted: 'But she was also entangled with other people.’”

So…it does appear JD was RIGHT when he was ‘crazy with jealousy’, because she was cheating with him with anything with a pulse. London Fields was filmed in 2014, and this implies he suspected AH was cheating with CD from that point onwards.

CD contradicts herself from one sentence to the next, she says it started AFTER the divorce, but then states it was DURING. She also states AH was ‘entangled’ with ‘other people’ which the DM has taken to mean EM, but ‘people’ is a plural word, so that means CD is stating that AH has at least THREE lovers on the go at the point the divorce commenced. EM sent her that text offering her security right after the final ‘violent’ incident with JD, so he was around that point as well…plus there is the footage of James Franco in the lift, and the former friend who stated AH had overnight visitors possibly in excess of 50 times when JD wasn’t present.

All this is VERY telling, considering that AH claimed to have the most severe form of PTSD and had to have ‘rules’ about how people could touch her…yet here is a former lover literally admitting that AH was whoring herself out to any famous/wealthy person that might be her next meal ticket, it looks like all this was her getting ready to latch onto someone else as she was losing her grip on JD.

It’s no surprise that of the 3+ she was having affairs with, that she went for the wealthiest (EM) when it was clear he was willing to go all-in with her.

This is one of the things that made AH’s claims so unbelievable…because even if she was abused (there are some elements of the case that is just her word against his and we can never know for absolutely certain that he never hit her…but we DO know that he never gave her any serious injury)…is that she laid it on thick claiming it had a serious impact on her in terms of PTSD, to an extent that Dr Curry described her completing the questionnaires as if she was was someone who struggled to get out of bed and get dressed etc, which clearly didn’t happen, because in the aftermath of the marriage she was happily shagging anything with a pulse/wallet, up until 2022 she never appeared to single and there appeared to be overlap between Bianca and possibly Eve, plus she was working on Aquaman 1, making public appearances with EM and doing magazine shoots, plus she then planned and carried out a surrogacy and started raising a child as a single parent, while also at that time working on further movies and doing adverts for L’Oréal, while also being heavily involved in 2 major legal cases…and she was doing paid public speeches as a ‘survivor’ and became a ‘women’s rights ambassador’ and walked the red carpet at multiple events and gave interviews. The woman couldn’t have been more ‘active’ if she’d tried.

I’m actually surprised we aren’t hearing more from her now, I really can see someone who is so adrenaline/drama seeking actually enjoying a quiet life just parenting young children, it’s also well documented by her own texts/emails that she enjoys recreational drugs. I know that when she accepted a much lower payment amount in exchange for dropping her appeal that it would have come with an agreement that she can’t talk about JD/trial, which also makes it obvious that appeal was just a publicity stunt and she knew she couldn’t win it…but that wouldn’t stop her talking about other things or being in relationships etc.

I think there’s more going on with her currently than her being a stay at home mother through choice. Maybe EM is the father of the children and has found a way to keep her so contained, otherwise he takes away the children/money.

If anything, it’s JD who behaves like he has PTSD, and that started before the marriage even ended. All the stimming, jumpiness, looking at the floor, hunched shoulders etc in public appearances, there have been times he even looks tearful. His lack of claim of ‘specific psychological injury’ and refusal to be evaluated as a result of not claiming it…doesn’t actually mean he doesn’t have it, what it means is he didn’t want to use that approach in the trial, because his claim was based around loss of earning due to her public accusations, he didn’t make a financial claim for damages to his health (which he could have done because the jury clearly believed she injured his finger which was a major health issue when it happened).

It could very likely be that JD didn’t want a claim of continuing impact on his mental health made by his lawyers due to a fear that could be another risk mark against him from future employers.

AH is out running marathons with an assistant there to capture her fake grin for Instagram, plus she’s arranged and had carried out surrogacy for a further 2 babies. She had a ‘nanny’ even when she had only 1 child and no work, so what she does all day, who knows, but you can guarantee it’s not childcare/housework as she has staff. I think she’s been plotting, and she’s dangerous, but nothing has been coming together for her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
'Cara Delevingne has finally confirmed she was romantically involved with Amber Heard at the height of the Aquaman star's divorce from Johnny Depp.'

Ms Delevingne, 33, has confirmed that she and Ms Heard became 'entangled' when she went through her messy divorce from Depp in 2016, and said the Pirates Of The Caribbean star was 'driven crazy by jealousy'.
Cara is a weird one. She always goes for women who haven't previously dated a woman openly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
As usual, Jennifer Robinson and her cronies are coming from the issue from the wrong angle. If they want people to be able to speak out publicly, and they also want those people protected from being sued for defamation…what they actually need to campaign for is for unproven accusations not to be used by the media to create front page stories and pressure on employers to not work with the accused…because that is where the loss of earnings comes from, and that really is why people get sued.

With Amber, she worked with Dan Wootton on The Sun article (and presumably got paid for it)…but Dan then took it a step further and published an open letter to JK Rowling trying to pressure her into using her influence to get Johnny booted off a movie franchise. That’s where the issue lies..an unproved accusation shouldn’t ever cause someone to lose work, especially when it’s of a criminal nature and the alleged victim has decided not to even attempt justice via the police and is instead just seeking publicly/attention, or just personal revenge.

To speak out without fear of being sued for a loss of income, means the process needs to not affect someone’s income, yet Jennifer and her cronies generally have the opposite viewpoint to this and want the maximin damage done to the accused’s career.

Aside from that, I think the most simple answer is that people should not be making public accusations at all, unless they have very solid evidence to back it up. One question that never gets asked to ‘survivors’ is why they need to speak publicly? Why not talk to a therapist/family or make a report to the police? It seems it’s just attention seeking and in some cases, such as with Amber, opportunistic because she was hoping to further her career by getting pictures of her bruised face on front covers and the highly coveted role with the ACLU.

A genuinely traumatised person doesn’t deal with it by going on a talk show or doing a newspaper interview. As soon as people deal with it that way, rather than via the police or via things like workplace complaints procedures, where the claim will be evaluated…it’s obvious that there is a much higher likelihood of them lying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
As usual, Jennifer Robinson and her cronies are coming from the issue from the wrong angle. If they want people to be able to speak out publicly, and they also want those people protected from being sued for defamation…what they actually need to campaign for is for unproven accusations not to be used by the media to create front page stories and pressure on employers to not work with the accused…because that is where the loss of earnings comes from, and that really is why people get sued.

With Amber, she worked with Dan Wootton on The Sun article (and presumably got paid for it)…but Dan then took it a step further and published an open letter to JK Rowling trying to pressure her into using her influence to get Johnny booted off a movie franchise. That’s where the issue lies..an unproved accusation shouldn’t ever cause someone to lose work, especially when it’s of a criminal nature and the alleged victim has decided not to even attempt justice via the police and is instead just seeking publicly/attention, or just personal revenge.

To speak out without fear of being sued for a loss of income, means the process needs to not affect someone’s income, yet Jennifer and her cronies generally have the opposite viewpoint to this and want the maximin damage done to the accused’s career.

Aside from that, I think the most simple answer is that people should not be making public accusations at all, unless they have very solid evidence to back it up. One question that never gets asked to ‘survivors’ is why they need to speak publicly? Why not talk to a therapist/family or make a report to the police? It seems it’s just attention seeking and in some cases, such as with Amber, opportunistic because she was hoping to further her career by getting pictures of her bruised face on front covers and the highly coveted role with the ACLU.

A genuinely traumatised person doesn’t deal with it by going on a talk show or doing a newspaper interview. As soon as people deal with it that way, rather than via the police or via things like workplace complaints procedures, where the claim will be evaluated…it’s obvious that there is a much higher likelihood of them lying.
Dan caused a lot of tit...even using the picture that he would have known was edited on the front page. Yet as soon as it was proven she lied, he then showed the piece of tit he was by saying sorry to both of them, rather than admitting he was wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
because she was hoping to further her career by getting pictures of her bruised face on front covers and the highly coveted role with the ACLU.

A genuinely traumatised person doesn’t deal with it by going on a talk show or doing a newspaper interview. As soon as people deal with it that way, rather than via the police or via things like workplace complaints procedures, where the claim will be evaluated…it’s obvious that there is a much higher likelihood of them lying.
Ahhh yes, I am reminded of the bruise wheel make up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1