Bryan McFadden and Ashton Kutcher, Mandleson's wet dream?
(These names are jokes for folk who dont get brit humour, though 
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
(These names are jokes for folk who dont get brit humour, though 
Looks like the shitflood/avalanche has done its work, a cover-up like this now barely raising an eyebrow - and along with my complete lack of surprise that the only head to roll was that of the one who tried to do the right thing.The FBI report states that McFadden found Kushner’s business activity to be “mind boggling” and that “she had never seen a flow like that.”
The Epstein Whistleblower Who Was Silenced
A former Deutsche Bank compliance officer told the FBI she was fired in 2018 after flagging suspicious activity in accounts linked to Jeffrey Epstein and Jared Kushner, offering yet another example of how they operated above the law.jacobin.com
FBI depositions/statements(?) from McFadden and Quigley in EFTA00128968 and EFTA00128987, and various lawyer and company names which in turn produce their own stacks of results... it really is something that needs a full 3-d visualisation (or even 4-d to show how it changed over time).
Interesting to see in those two the talk from Deutsche Bank of how they were wanting to dump the accounts but it wasn't so straightforward to do that as was a reputational problem rather than due to a technical breach of rules or some such.
Dusti Rhea Duke is the one being talked about in this document
New investigations in response to the disclosures, this time in France
bsky.app
Seems like every country affected is interested in actually dealing with it, every country except the US.
Anonymous (@opdeatheaters.bsky.social)
Prosecutors in France opened new investigations tied to Epstein, one on grape trafficking and another on money laundering, corruption, tax fraud. Authorities say they’ll re-examine prior materials and new disclosures and are urging victims to come forward. #OpDeathEaters #EpsteinCoverup #EpsteinFiles
bsky.app
Seems like every country affected is interested in actually dealing with it, every country except the US.
Andrew has been arrested 
Not related to the trafficking unfortunately but hopefully that will come next!Andrew has been arrested
The smug sh!t thought he was above the law......it's a move in the right direction, and will make others realise that money doesn't mean you are above the law. I hope more perpetrators are squirming right now due to this.....
Crimes against money take priority over crimes against children, depressingly.
The sceptic in me fears they are doing this to make it look like they are doing something about it and nothing will come of the worse stuff. Charge him on lesser charges to appease the public maybe. I am cynical in my old age though 
Probably much easier to gather evidence and prove fraud than historic abuse sadly. At least they have managed to get him on something.
You may well be right though (e2a : as noted above, beaten to it!) it's also likely that this charge is one they would be able to prove in relatively short order as there's clear documented evidence, whereas anything else will need re-interviews(?) and presumably witness questioning in court, and that's before we get anywhere near extradition.The sceptic in me fears they are doing this to make it look like they are doing something about it and nothing will come of the worse stuff. Charge him on lesser charges to appease the public maybe. I am cynical in my old age though
Actually thinking about that, I have a feeling that being in prison for one thing would mean that he couldn't be extradited until he had served his sentence?
Have any other women apart from sadly deceased Giuffre given statements against him?
Good question, if there's none to come forward then I suspect it will end up filed somewhere under 'unlikely to succeed', I'm not sure what else they could do.
Maybe this will give them the push if they can see that something might actually be done. We can only hope.
You never know - but it will likely have to wait for the current one to be completed - but even this has its possibilities since a conviction would be on the basis of undisclosed information which would (potentially or definitely?) be grounds for US investigation of insider trading, which in turn would lead to questions about who knew what (and of course all their denials) and whether the US has some sort of proceeds or crime type legislation if you knowingly put your money in the hands of a crook to invest.
It might be that there's dominoes to topple first of financial dodginess which stand at least some (even if small) chance of being linked to people.
Fascinating though the closed-door session of the big-money guy yesterday who was denying knowing anything but maybe he really was that stupid? I mean looking at his published statement it does seem he just handed over power of attorney of his money to some guy that he had not bothered to do a background check on.
Don’t think this has been covered by the media much
www.ibtimes.co.uk
Is Andrew Involved? Gordon Brown Reveals Epstein Used UK Airport To 'Fly In Girls' From Eastern Europe
Former PM Gordon Brown says Jeffrey Epstein used UK airports for trafficking, with his claims now prompting police investigations and renewed scrutiny.
www.ibtimes.co.uk
Did we know this? I'm not following the Andrew thread. It's being reported in the Mirror.
www.mirror.co.uk
Andrew accused of watching young girl be 'tortured with electrical shocks'
A FBI report alleges the former prince watched as a girl aged six to eight years old was 'tortured with electrical shocks' by Ghislaine Maxwell, with Andrew denying all wrongdoing
The phrase 'electrical shocks' brings up three differently redacted versions of the FBI report "Date/Time Received: 07/13/2020 08:02 PM EDT"; EFTA00020457, EFTA00090319, EFTA01249597, all three versions show "I am willing to testify" which I would guess could apply to any prosecutions or can it only be presumed (if no further clarification) to be for the one the report is labelled with, i.e. against Epstein?
Maybe they tried and were silenced. Especially after Giuffre's death I would assume some who thought of coming forward have decided not to.
He's been released. I would have thought he's a flight risk, but what do I know.