Very fair. There is science supporting both sides and absolutely to each their own. I personally don’t eat for 16hours of the day. I don’t get hungry until I start eating and it’s easier for me to manage that hunger inside the shorter 8 window rather than try and keep it in check all day long. But it’s also another way for me to cater to a restrictive eating disorder so the idea of OMAD is as alluring as it is horrifying. Is it all in pursuit of weight loss, or just weight maintenance? Or is it going beyond weight management into other perceived bebefits?
trigger warning: disordered eating mentioned
Well, it’s more than weight loss for some. It is something that can help those with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.Others use it to help ease symptoms of inflammatory diseases. Some people who do not need or want to lose weight fast for the autophagy benefits, though that’s stepping into the territory of extended fasting rather than intermittent. Everything I have read warns against doing OMAD on an ongoing basis, so my comment wasn’t in defense of that or against what you stated in particular. There are myths that persist like calories in vs calories out, breakfast being the most important meal, your metabolism will tank if you fast, etc.
I do agree that certain aspects of fasting can trigger disordered eating, or as you say cater to eating disorders, which is why it’s not for everyone and you have to know yourself. But then I know others who have healed their relationship with food through fasting, as they say it cuts back on their cravings and some bingeing tendencies. I just think it shouldn’t be dismissed just because many, including those in the medical field (as well as meddling mother-in-laws

) try to convince you you are going to kill yourself by fasting.